Value
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.9 |
| P/S | 9.1 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.0 |
| PEG | 3.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 15.0x
- ▸PEG: 4.13
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The insurance segment accounts for approximately 88% of total revenues, creating concentration risk such that any adverse shift in underwriting cycle conditions, catastrophe frequency, or regulatory changes would have an outsized impact on total company performance. Bear case | Insurance segment combined ratio remains below 95% over the next 12 months, confirming underwriting discipline is maintained within acceptable profitability parameters. | →Stable |
| CounterFor a specialty insurer, high segment concentration can reflect focused expertise and pricing discipline in selected markets rather than a risk factor; diversification for its own sake can dilute underwriting returns. | ||
W.R. Berkley converts 172% of net income into free cash flow, reflecting the float-driven nature of the insurance business model where premiums are collected before claims are paid, generating superior capital availability relative to reported earnings. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow relative to net income remains above 130% over the next 12 months, confirming the insurance float model continues to generate superior cash returns. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh free cash flow conversion in insurance companies depends on disciplined underwriting; if the combined ratio deteriorates due to catastrophe events or adverse reserve development, both reported earnings and cash generation could decline sharply. | ||
The company has beaten or matched analyst earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, with an average positive surprise of approximately 8%, demonstrating consistent ability to meet or exceed underwriting profitability expectations. Earnings | At least 3 of the next 4 quarterly reports show positive earnings surprises, maintaining the established beat trajectory. | →Stable |
| CounterEarnings estimates are trending downward, which may reflect analyst expectations of a tougher underwriting environment or increased catastrophe exposure; deteriorating estimates make future beats structurally harder. | ||
The stock has exceeded its analyst price target by approximately 11%, is in a technical death cross, and sits below its 200-day moving average, combining negative asymmetry with a confirmed technical downtrend signal that blocks entry. Warnings | Analyst price targets are revised upward by more than 15% over 12 months as insurance sector dynamics improve, restoring positive upside. | →Stable |
| CounterDeath crosses are lagging indicators that frequently give false negative signals; a property and casualty insurer with strong underwriting may recover quickly if catastrophe losses moderate. | ||
CounterFor a specialty insurer, high segment concentration can reflect focused expertise and pricing discipline in selected markets rather than a risk factor; diversification for its own sake can dilute underwriting returns.
CounterHigh free cash flow conversion in insurance companies depends on disciplined underwriting; if the combined ratio deteriorates due to catastrophe events or adverse reserve development, both reported earnings and cash generation could decline sharply.
CounterEarnings estimates are trending downward, which may reflect analyst expectations of a tougher underwriting environment or increased catastrophe exposure; deteriorating estimates make future beats structurally harder.
CounterDeath crosses are lagging indicators that frequently give false negative signals; a property and casualty insurer with strong underwriting may recover quickly if catastrophe losses moderate.
W.R. Berkley is a financially sound property and casualty insurer with a strong Piotroski score of 8/9 and excellent cash conversion at 172% of net income, but the stock is in a technical death cross with the analyst price target already exceeded, leaving no upside and significant near-term downside risk.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.9 |
| P/S | 9.1 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.0 |
| PEG | 3.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 6.7 |
| ROA | 2.4 |
| Gross margin | 4.7 |
| Op margin | 6.8 |
| Net margin | 6.3 |
| Current ratio | 1.5 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 6.4 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.5 |
| EPS growth | 7.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.3 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 8.0 |
| Volume | 2.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 3.9 |
| erm sentiment | 3.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.6 |
| quality rank | 6.1 |
| growth rank | 3.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.2 |
| support resistance | 0.3 |
| 52w position | 8.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 10.0 |
| volatility | 7.4 |
| put call | 8.6 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 8.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 3.5 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 73
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilitySpeculative — Binary industry: Insurance - Property & Casualty
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.3 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 7.5) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.8=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.79 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.5, Momentum at 7.0, and Quality at 6.0; the weakest are Technical at 3.1, Peer rank at 3.1, and Catalyst at 4.3. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.79 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFree cash flow as a percentage of net income falls below 100%, indicating the insurance float model is no longer generating the cash conversion premium.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -5% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, indicating the downward estimate trend is translating into actual misses.
Trip ifStock price drops below $64, more than 6% below the current $68.03, reaching the defined stop-loss level near $64.79.
Trip ifInsurance combined ratio rises above 100% in any reported quarter, signaling the underwriting business has shifted to unprofitability.