Skip to main content
WEYSWeyco Group, Inc.Sell5.4·$51.87
WEYS · Why this verdict

Why Weyco Group (WEYS) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.4/10
ConfidenceHIGH
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Weyco is a high-quality footwear company, but earnings are expected to fall about 60% from a peak, the shares are overbought near their 52-week high, and insiders keep selling.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Earnings are expected to decline about 60% from a peak, with the forward P/E at 35x versus 14x trailing.

↑Improving
Warnings
Expectation
Forward P/E falls toward trailing levels only if forward earnings hold up.

CounterThe company has a Piotroski F-Score of 9/9 and conservative debt, so a dip in earnings may be absorbed without damage.

The shares are overbought (RSI 80) and only 1.9% from the 52-week high, leaving little room for further upside.

↓Deteriorating
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
Price consolidates and RSI cools without breaking the 200-day average.

CounterMomentum is strong, with rising on-balance volume and MACD at 10, and breakouts from highs can continue.

Business quality is high, with a Piotroski F-Score of 9/9, a quality score of 7.0 and a moat score of 7.0.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
The F-Score stays at 7/9 or higher.

CounterQuality is measured on trailing results that may be at a peak, so the score could fall as earnings decline.

Insiders sold $616,549 across 12 transactions in 90 days with no purchases, giving a bearish signal.

→Stable
Insider
Expectation
Insider selling fades within 12 months.

CounterThe selling is only 0.125% of market cap and no C-level executives sold, so it may be routine diversification.

Quarterly revenue fell to $62.2M from $76.8M two quarters earlier, a sequential slide.

↓Deteriorating
Earnings
Expectation
Quarterly revenue recovers above $68M.

CounterRevenue is up from $58.2M a year earlier, so the slide may be normal seasonality.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.1/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/E8.1
P/S9.1
EV/EBITDA6.6
Fwd P/E3.0
PEG10.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 35.9x
  • ▸PEG: 0.07
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

7.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE4.6
ROA5.8
Gross margin5.8
Op margin10.0
Net margin6.2
Current ratio5.5
FCF quality7.7
Moat7.0
Piotroski F10.0
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 9/9

Growth

4.2/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth4.2

Momentum

4.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.2
MACD7.8
OBV1.0
MA position9.0
Volume0.4
  • ▸Overbought (RSI 76)
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
erm sentiment5.0

Insider

3.3/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality3.0
insider conviction2.0
holder change5.0
  • ▸Notable insider selling — $616,549 (0.124% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

5.8/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank4.8
quality rank3.9
growth rank5.6
  • ▸Conservative debt levels

Technical

4.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger2.9
support resistance2.0
52w position9.3

Risk (lower is worse)

7.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.8
days to cover6.0
volatility4.9
beta7.8
debt equity9.9

Catalyst

3.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history0.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.0
dividend safety5.5
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 1B/3M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (6)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:18d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • MOMENTUM:4.5<4.5
Warning (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+0.0%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.5B) below institutional reach

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.5B<$5B

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.9 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 7.5) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:4.5<4.5) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.00 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.5, Value at 7.1, and Quality at 7.0; the weakest are Catalyst at 3.1, Insider at 3.3, and Growth at 4.2. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Earnings Decline From Peak

    Trip ifForward P/E falls below 20x from current 35.5x.

  • P2Overbought Near High

    Trip ifShare price exceeds the current 52-week high by more than 10%.

  • P3High Business Quality

    Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6/9 from current 9/9.

  • P4Persistent Insider Selling

    Trip ifNet insider selling over 90 days falls below $100,000 from current $616,549.

  • P5Sequential Revenue Decline

    Trip ifQuarterly revenue rises above $68M from current $62.2M.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › WEYS › Why this verdict