Value
7.0/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 21.2x
- ▸PEG: 0.01
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Werner's quality score of 2.0 out of 10 falls below the 4.0 minimum threshold required for investment consideration, driven by near-zero margins, cash-burning free cash flow, and the absence of a competitive moat. Quality breakdown | Quality score recovers above 4.0 over 12 months, driven by improvement in operating margins from near-zero levels and conversion of negative free cash flow to positive. | →Stable |
| CounterTrucking is a capital-intensive, low-margin cyclical industry; quality scores this low during a freight downcycle may normalize significantly once volumes recover, without any structural improvement in the business. | ||
At a current price of $43.07, Werner trades 22.2% above analyst consensus price targets, meaning the stock would need to fall significantly before reaching fair value per analysts — an unusual and bearish configuration. Bear case | Analyst price targets are raised by at least 15% above the current price within 6 months to restore positive upside, or the stock pulls back below $38 to re-align with existing targets. | →Stable |
| CounterAnalyst targets in freight often lag cyclical turns; if freight rates recover more sharply than expected, targets could be raised quickly to reflect improved earnings power. | ||
With a momentum score of 3.5, falling on-balance volume, and the moving average slope negative, Werner's price trend is deteriorating — confirming that selling pressure exceeds buying interest across time frames. Momentum breakdown | Momentum score rises above 5.5 and on-balance volume begins trending upward for at least 30 consecutive trading days, signaling renewed buying interest. | →Stable |
| CounterWerner trades above the 200-day moving average despite negative momentum signals, suggesting the stock is consolidating rather than in outright decline; a stabilization in freight volumes could reverse the trend quickly. | ||
Werner has split results over the last 4 quarters — 2 beats and 2 misses — with the two misses being severe at -52% and -123% surprise, indicating highly unpredictable earnings in a difficult freight environment. Earnings | Earnings beat rate improves to at least 3 of 4 quarters and miss severity stays above -10% surprise in any single quarter over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarter produced a large positive surprise of 132%, suggesting the worst of the earnings volatility may be behind the company as freight conditions stabilize. | ||
CounterTrucking is a capital-intensive, low-margin cyclical industry; quality scores this low during a freight downcycle may normalize significantly once volumes recover, without any structural improvement in the business.
CounterAnalyst targets in freight often lag cyclical turns; if freight rates recover more sharply than expected, targets could be raised quickly to reflect improved earnings power.
CounterWerner trades above the 200-day moving average despite negative momentum signals, suggesting the stock is consolidating rather than in outright decline; a stabilization in freight volumes could reverse the trend quickly.
CounterThe most recent quarter produced a large positive surprise of 132%, suggesting the worst of the earnings volatility may be behind the company as freight conditions stabilize.
Werner Enterprises faces a combination of negative price momentum, a quality score below the minimum acceptable threshold, and deeply negative upside versus current analyst targets, making the stock a candidate for position reduction rather than new entry.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.9 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.3 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.4 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 2.6 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.0 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.5 |
| quality rank | 1.7 |
| growth rank | 8.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.0 |
| support resistance | 3.7 |
| 52w position | 9.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.0 |
| days to cover | 7.1 |
| volatility | 4.1 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 3.2 |
| beta | 6.0 |
| debt equity | 6.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetupRange Bound — RSI 46 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $2.6B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 7.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-2.3=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.0, Growth at 5.9, and Momentum at 5.6; the weakest are Quality at 2.0, Peer rank at 4.4, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -2.32 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifOperating margin remains below 1% for at least 2 consecutive reported quarters, confirming no near-term quality recovery.
Trip ifStock price rises above $48, more than 11% above the current $43.07, without analyst targets increasing by at least 10%.
Trip ifMomentum score falls below 3.0 and on-balance volume declines for more than 40 consecutive trading days.
Trip ifEarnings surprise falls below -20% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.