Value
7.4/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.5 |
| P/S | 7.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.2 |
| PEG | 9.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 10.3x
- ▸PEG: 0.67
- ▸Attractively valued
WBS · Why this verdict
Why Webster Financial (WBS) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Webster Financial has beaten earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters with a consistent beat margin averaging 3.8%, trades at a forward P/E of 10.2x with strong margin quality, but sits at the top of its 52-week range with negative asymmetry and limited near-term upside at current prices.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Webster Financial has beaten EPS consensus estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters, with actual EPS ranging from $1.52 to $1.59 against consensus estimates near $1.52, demonstrating consistent, predictable earnings delivery that supports the investment case. Earnings | Earnings beat streak extends to 6 consecutive quarters and average quarterly EPS surprise remains above 2%. | ↑Improving |
| CounterWebster's perfect beat streak over 4 quarters shows very small absolute surprises of 1-8%; this tight delivery may reflect conservative guidance management and could be interrupted by any credit quality deterioration. | ||
Webster's net margins of 37% rank best in class among regional bank peers, paired with a strong Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9, reflecting a fundamentally sound institution with above-average earnings quality. Quality breakdown | Net margin remains above 30% on a trailing 12-month basis and the Piotroski F-Score stays at or above 7 out of 9 over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterBest-in-class margins at a regional bank may compress as the interest rate environment shifts; banks that outperform in rising rate environments often give back the margin expansion when rates stabilize or decline. | ||
With the stock sitting 0.5% below its 52-week high and an asymmetry ratio of -2.62, the stock trades above analyst price targets with no near-term price upside priced in; the reward-to-risk ratio is -0.71, making new position entry unattractive at current levels. Targets | A pullback to below $65 restores a positive reward-to-risk ratio above 1.5, creating a better entry opportunity within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterStocks with strong fundamental momentum at 52-week highs often continue to new highs through analyst target upgrades; the negative asymmetry may resolve upward rather than through a price pullback. | ||
Webster carries 2 medium-severity concentration risks identified in its annual report risk disclosures, indicating documented areas where portfolio concentration could amplify losses if a specific sector or geography experiences stress. Risk breakdown | No disclosed credit concentration losses exceeding 0.5% of total assets are reported over the next 4 quarters. | ↑Improving |
| CounterMedium-severity concentration flags are standard disclosures at mid-size regional banks and reflect normal risk management documentation rather than imminent credit deterioration. | ||
Webster Financial has beaten EPS consensus estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters, with actual EPS ranging from $1.52 to $1.59 against consensus estimates near $1.52, demonstrating consistent, predictable earnings delivery that supports the investment case.
↑ImprovingEarnings
- Expectation
- Earnings beat streak extends to 6 consecutive quarters and average quarterly EPS surprise remains above 2%.
CounterWebster's perfect beat streak over 4 quarters shows very small absolute surprises of 1-8%; this tight delivery may reflect conservative guidance management and could be interrupted by any credit quality deterioration.
Webster's net margins of 37% rank best in class among regional bank peers, paired with a strong Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9, reflecting a fundamentally sound institution with above-average earnings quality.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Net margin remains above 30% on a trailing 12-month basis and the Piotroski F-Score stays at or above 7 out of 9 over the next 12 months.
CounterBest-in-class margins at a regional bank may compress as the interest rate environment shifts; banks that outperform in rising rate environments often give back the margin expansion when rates stabilize or decline.
With the stock sitting 0.5% below its 52-week high and an asymmetry ratio of -2.62, the stock trades above analyst price targets with no near-term price upside priced in; the reward-to-risk ratio is -0.71, making new position entry unattractive at current levels.
→StableTargets
- Expectation
- A pullback to below $65 restores a positive reward-to-risk ratio above 1.5, creating a better entry opportunity within 12 months.
CounterStocks with strong fundamental momentum at 52-week highs often continue to new highs through analyst target upgrades; the negative asymmetry may resolve upward rather than through a price pullback.
Webster carries 2 medium-severity concentration risks identified in its annual report risk disclosures, indicating documented areas where portfolio concentration could amplify losses if a specific sector or geography experiences stress.
↑ImprovingRisk breakdown
- Expectation
- No disclosed credit concentration losses exceeding 0.5% of total assets are reported over the next 4 quarters.
CounterMedium-severity concentration flags are standard disclosures at mid-size regional banks and reflect normal risk management documentation rather than imminent credit deterioration.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.6 |
| ROA | 0.8 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Moat | 4.8 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Strong margins: 37%
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
4.9/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.7 |
| EPS growth | 5.1 |
Momentum
2.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 2.1 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
4.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 4.8 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 4.8 |
Insider
7.3/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
- ▸Negligible insider selling — $573,376 (0.005% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
4.9/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.8 |
| quality rank | 6.9 |
| growth rank | 3.1 |
- ▸Best-in-class margins
Technical
7.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.5 |
| support resistance | 6.2 |
| 52w position | 9.6 |
Risk (lower is worse)
8.9/10data confidence 60%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 10.0 |
| volatility | 9.8 |
| beta | 7.0 |
- ▸Concentration risks: 2 MED (10-K Item 1A)
Catalyst
6.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.4 |
| dividend safety | 5.5 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
- ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
- ▸Earnings in 0 days
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Downgraded from BUY WAIT — price $76.07 has reached target $76.14. No upside to wait for.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L3:NEWS_BLOCK|SANITY:WAIT+price>=TPPassed (4)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
- MOMENTUM:2.9<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:-2.8=NEGATIVE
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:0d<=7d
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-2.79
Upside
-13.9%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRange Bound — RSI 48 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
A recent news event triggered an L3 news-block on the verdict path. Trigger: Downgraded from BUY WAIT — price $76.07 has reached target $76.14. No upside to wait for. The 10-dimension scores remain Risk (lower is worse) at 8.9 (strongest), but MOMENTUM:2.9<4.5 also fails — the news block is the proximate trigger, not the sole driver.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 8.9, Value at 7.4, and Insider at 7.3; the weakest are Momentum at 2.9, Peer rank at 4.9, and Sentiment at 4.9. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -2.79 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Perfect Quarterly Earnings Execution
Trip ifEPS falls below $1.40 in at least 1 of the next 4 quarters, breaking the consistent delivery range.
- P2Strong Margin Quality Best In Class
Trip ifNet margin falls below 28%, indicating more than a 9-point compression from the current 37%.
- P3Negative Asymmetry At 52 Week High
Trip ifPrice rises above $85 without analyst target upgrades above $90, leaving the stock more than 10% above fair value.
- P4Concentration Risk 2 Medium
Trip ifCredit charge-offs or provisioning increases by more than 50% year-over-year in any single quarter, indicating concentration risk has materialized.