Value
8.6/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 23.1x
- ▸PEG: 0.20
- ▸Attractively valued
VET · Why this verdict
Why Vermilion Energy (VET) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Vermilion Energy trades at a forward price-to-earnings of 16.4x with a 16.7% free cash flow yield despite GAAP losses, but a debt-to-equity ratio of 3.0, three of four recent earnings misses with massive negative surprises, and an elevated put-to-call ratio of 4.60 signal severe near-term financial risk that places this below the minimum quality threshold.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Vermilion generates a 15% free cash flow margin and a 16.7% FCF yield despite reporting a GAAP net loss, indicating that oil and gas production is generating real cash that non-cash impairments and depreciation charges obscure at the headline earnings level. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow margin stays above 10% and FCF yield remains above 10% over the next four quarters, confirming the cash generation story is not deteriorating. | →Stable |
| CounterThree of four recent quarters showed massive earnings misses including a 3,675% negative surprise, suggesting that even if FCF is positive, the company's financial model has unexpected cost volatility that may eventually erode cash generation. | ||
Vermilion's debt-to-equity ratio of 3.0 combined with two identified value-trap signals — high leverage and negative free cash flow in recent periods — creates a capital structure that could become distressed if oil prices fall significantly, especially given the company's small market cap of $1.6 billion. Bear case | Debt-to-equity ratio declines below 2.0 within 12 months through either debt repayment or asset sales, demonstrating meaningful deleveraging progress. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterEnergy producers typically carry higher leverage than companies in other sectors because their asset base of proven reserves provides natural debt collateral; Vermilion's leverage level may be appropriate given asset coverage, and the company has a history of navigating commodity cycles. | ||
Vermilion missed earnings by 441%, 3,675%, and 89% in three of the last four quarters, representing some of the most severe negative surprises in the energy sector and indicating that management guidance and analyst models are consistently far from actual outcomes. Earnings | Earnings per share surprise is better than negative 30% in at least 2 of the next 3 quarters, demonstrating that the miss severity is improving toward predictable guidance. | →Stable |
| CounterEnergy company earnings misses of this magnitude often reflect commodity price movements and hedging outcomes that are outside management control; once oil prices stabilize, EPS predictability typically improves significantly. | ||
A put-to-call ratio of 4.60, the highest among currently tracked securities, indicates that options market participants are overwhelmingly positioned for further price declines, which represents significant negative sentiment from sophisticated market participants with asymmetric information. Key risks | The put-to-call ratio falls below 2.0 within 3 months, reflecting reduced hedging pressure and improved market confidence in the near-term outlook. | Tripped↓Deteriorating |
| CounterHigh put-to-call ratios in energy stocks often represent portfolio hedging by institutions that own the equity rather than directional bets; the elevated ratio may overstate bearish consensus and could unwind quickly if oil prices recover. | ||
Vermilion generates a 15% free cash flow margin and a 16.7% FCF yield despite reporting a GAAP net loss, indicating that oil and gas production is generating real cash that non-cash impairments and depreciation charges obscure at the headline earnings level.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Free cash flow margin stays above 10% and FCF yield remains above 10% over the next four quarters, confirming the cash generation story is not deteriorating.
CounterThree of four recent quarters showed massive earnings misses including a 3,675% negative surprise, suggesting that even if FCF is positive, the company's financial model has unexpected cost volatility that may eventually erode cash generation.
Vermilion's debt-to-equity ratio of 3.0 combined with two identified value-trap signals — high leverage and negative free cash flow in recent periods — creates a capital structure that could become distressed if oil prices fall significantly, especially given the company's small market cap of $1.6 billion.
↓DeterioratingBear case
- Expectation
- Debt-to-equity ratio declines below 2.0 within 12 months through either debt repayment or asset sales, demonstrating meaningful deleveraging progress.
CounterEnergy producers typically carry higher leverage than companies in other sectors because their asset base of proven reserves provides natural debt collateral; Vermilion's leverage level may be appropriate given asset coverage, and the company has a history of navigating commodity cycles.
Vermilion missed earnings by 441%, 3,675%, and 89% in three of the last four quarters, representing some of the most severe negative surprises in the energy sector and indicating that management guidance and analyst models are consistently far from actual outcomes.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- Earnings per share surprise is better than negative 30% in at least 2 of the next 3 quarters, demonstrating that the miss severity is improving toward predictable guidance.
CounterEnergy company earnings misses of this magnitude often reflect commodity price movements and hedging outcomes that are outside management control; once oil prices stabilize, EPS predictability typically improves significantly.
A put-to-call ratio of 4.60, the highest among currently tracked securities, indicates that options market participants are overwhelmingly positioned for further price declines, which represents significant negative sentiment from sophisticated market participants with asymmetric information.
Tripped↓DeterioratingKey risks
- Expectation
- The put-to-call ratio falls below 2.0 within 3 months, reflecting reduced hedging pressure and improved market confidence in the near-term outlook.
CounterHigh put-to-call ratios in energy stocks often represent portfolio hedging by institutions that own the equity rather than directional bets; the elevated ratio may overstate bearish consensus and could unwind quickly if oil prices recover.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.9 |
| Gross margin | 8.3 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 2.5 |
| FCF quality | 7.1 |
| Moat | 5.9 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸FCF-positive despite GAAP loss (FCF margin 15%, FCF yield 18.1%)
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
7.5/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
Momentum
7.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 9.4 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.0 |
| Volume | 3.9 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.6 |
| Price target | 10.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (1.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Analyst upside: 167%
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%Peer rank
4.6/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 9.8 |
| quality rank | 0.5 |
| growth rank | 5.5 |
Technical
2.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.1 |
| 52w position | 3.9 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| days to cover | 0.9 |
| volatility | 3.9 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 2.2 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 7.2 |
- ▸Elevated put/call: 2.67
- ▸High IV: 67%
Catalyst
3.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.8 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 1B/3M
- ▸Earnings in 8 days
- ▸Dividend: 3.9%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:7.1>=5.5
- ASYMMETRY:8.8>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (0)
none
Warning (1)
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:8d<=14d (soft)
Reward-to-Risk
8.82
Upside
+127.2%
Downside
14.4%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.5B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.5B<$5B
Investment implication
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects clean gate clearance against Value at 8.6 and asymmetric R:R of 8.82.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.6, Growth at 7.5, and Momentum at 7.1; the weakest are Technical at 2.2, Catalyst at 3.0, and Quality at 3.7. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 8.82 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Fcf Yield Despite Gaap Loss
Trip ifFree cash flow margin falls below 5% for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating oil price weakness or rising costs are eroding the FCF generation story.
- P2High Leverage Value Trap Signals
Trip ifDebt-to-equity ratio rises above 4.0 or net debt increases by more than 20% year-over-year, confirming leverage is becoming unmanageable.
- P3Earnings Miss Severity
Trip ifEPS miss exceeds 100% for at least 2 of the next 3 quarters, indicating the earnings model remains severely broken.
- P4Elevated Put Call Ratio RiskTripped
Trip ifPut-to-call ratio rises above 6.0 and stock price drops below $8, more than 24% below the current $10.56, reflecting accelerating bearish positioning.