Value
7.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.6 |
| P/S | 7.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 11.1x
- ▸PEG: 0.29
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Victory Capital derives 80% of its revenue from mutual funds and other pooled investment vehicles, creating vulnerability to secular outflows toward passive index funds and ETFs that have been compressing active manager fee pools for over a decade. Bear case | Net flows into active strategies remain positive or net outflows do not exceed 3% of assets under management in any single quarter over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterVictory Capital has pursued an acquisition-led diversification strategy and has demonstrated the ability to offset some passive headwinds with organic inflows; the 80% concentration may overstate product vulnerability if the acquired strategies have differentiated performance records. | ||
Despite strong fundamentals, Victory Capital's momentum score of 3.9 and falling on-balance volume signal that institutional sellers are currently outpacing buyers, and the analyst price target has already been reached, creating a negative asymmetry in the current setup. Scores | On-balance volume trends turn positive and RSI rises above 52 within the next two quarters, indicating technical recovery that supports a more favorable entry point. | →Stable |
| CounterRange-bound price action in a high-quality compounder can simply reflect sector rotation away from financials rather than deteriorating business fundamentals, and a single catalyst such as a strong quarterly beat could rapidly shift the momentum picture. | ||
Victory Capital earned a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9/9 alongside 26% operating margins and a wide economic moat score, indicating a financially sound business with durable competitive advantages in the asset management industry. Quality breakdown | Operating margins remain above 22% and the Piotroski F-Score stays at 8 or above over the next four quarters, confirming sustained financial health. | →Stable |
| CounterAsset management margins are highly sensitive to equity market levels; a sustained bear market could reduce assets under management, compressing fees and margins regardless of operational quality. | ||
Victory Capital reported 77% year-over-year earnings growth while trading at a PEG ratio of 0.29 and forward price-to-earnings of 11.1x, suggesting the market is not yet pricing in the pace of earnings expansion. Growth breakdown | Earnings per share grow by at least 15% year-over-year over the next four quarters, keeping the PEG ratio below 0.5. | →Stable |
| CounterThe 77% earnings growth figure may reflect a low comparison base or one-time items; normalized earnings growth that reverts toward more typical asset manager levels of 8-12% would substantially reduce the apparent PEG discount. | ||
CounterVictory Capital has pursued an acquisition-led diversification strategy and has demonstrated the ability to offset some passive headwinds with organic inflows; the 80% concentration may overstate product vulnerability if the acquired strategies have differentiated performance records.
CounterRange-bound price action in a high-quality compounder can simply reflect sector rotation away from financials rather than deteriorating business fundamentals, and a single catalyst such as a strong quarterly beat could rapidly shift the momentum picture.
CounterAsset management margins are highly sensitive to equity market levels; a sustained bear market could reduce assets under management, compressing fees and margins regardless of operational quality.
CounterThe 77% earnings growth figure may reflect a low comparison base or one-time items; normalized earnings growth that reverts toward more typical asset manager levels of 8-12% would substantially reduce the apparent PEG discount.
Victory Capital Holdings combines a PEG ratio of 0.29 with 77% year-over-year earnings growth, a Piotroski F-Score of 9/9, and a wide economic moat, making it a high-quality compounder trading at a discount, though negative price momentum and a reached analyst target delay the near-term entry case.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.6 |
| P/S | 7.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 7.2 |
| ROA | 8.1 |
| Gross margin | 7.3 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 6.4 |
| FCF quality | 7.9 |
| Moat | 8.2 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 9.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 2.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 4.9 |
| erm sentiment | 4.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.3 |
| quality rank | 6.6 |
| growth rank | 9.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.7 |
| support resistance | 2.8 |
| 52w position | 9.5 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.6 |
| days to cover | 4.8 |
| volatility | 4.8 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 4.1 |
| max pain risk | 5.0 |
| beta | 6.6 |
| debt equity | 8.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 6.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.8 |
Fundamentals strong but target reached (-13.4% upside).
L4:PATH_C2_GARP|V8:TARGET_REACHEDSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The C-path quality+growth combination triggered the STRONG_BUY_WAIT verdict: quality 8.3 and growth 9.8 both clear their thresholds, with asymmetric R:R of -1.86 supporting the read.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 9.8, Quality at 8.3, and Value at 7.2; the weakest are Sentiment at 4.8, Technical at 5.0, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.86 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifOperating margin falls below 18% for 2 consecutive quarters, suggesting margin compression from AUM fee pressure.
Trip ifEarnings per share growth falls below 5% year-over-year for at least 2 consecutive quarters, invalidating the PEG-based discount thesis.
Trip ifNet outflows exceed 5% of total assets under management in any 1 quarter, signaling accelerating product mix shift away from active funds.
Trip ifMomentum score remains below 4.0 for more than 4 consecutive months and the stock falls more than 10% below the $85.97 current price.