Value
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.8 |
| P/S | 7.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.6 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.8 |
| PEG | 4.8 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 18.7x
- ▸PEG: 1.72
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
United Rentals holds superior quality metrics versus peers — with a 28% return on equity, 15% operating margins, and a Piotroski score of 7 out of 9 — but 3 consecutive earnings misses and a deeply negative risk/reward ratio at the current price near the 52-week high make near-term entry unfavorable.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
United Rentals earns a 28% return on equity and 15% operating margins, ranking it among the top-quality names in its peer group with a Piotroski financial strength score of 7 out of 9. Quality breakdown | Return on equity should remain above 20% and operating margins above 12% over the next 12 months, sustaining the quality premium. | →Stable |
| CounterFree cash flow quality at 75% of net income, while not catastrophic, is below the 100% level expected from a top-tier capital-light equipment rental business, suggesting some accrual inflation. | ||
United Rentals missed earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with an average negative surprise of 0.7%, indicating that management guidance or analyst models are systematically optimistic relative to actual business performance. Earnings | The company should return to positive earnings surprises in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters as estimate revisions become more realistic. | ↑Improving |
| CounterThe single beat in Q1 2026 showed a positive surprise of 8.6%, suggesting the miss trend may be reversing as analysts recalibrate expectations to a more challenging macro environment. | ||
With the stock 9.4% above the analyst price target and within 2.1% of its 52-week high, the current price offers effectively zero upside with 15% downside to the stop-loss level, creating an asymmetric risk that disfavors new positions. Warnings | A meaningful pullback below $1,000 would be required to restore an acceptable reward-to-risk setup over the next 12 months. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterStocks near 52-week highs in strong uptrends can continue to outperform if earnings revisions turn positive, and the strong technical momentum (RSI 76, rising OBV) suggests institutional buying remains active. | ||
A put-to-call ratio of 3.41 is one of the highest in the universe screened, signaling that options market participants are heavily hedging against downside — a warning sign when the stock is already at a stretched valuation. Options | The put-to-call ratio should decline below 1.5 over the next 12 months as either the price corrects or the fundamental picture improves enough to reduce hedging demand. | ↑Improving |
| CounterElevated put-to-call ratios in liquid large-cap industrials sometimes reflect institutional hedging of long positions rather than outright bearish bets, and can be a contrary indicator of near-term bottoms. | ||
CounterFree cash flow quality at 75% of net income, while not catastrophic, is below the 100% level expected from a top-tier capital-light equipment rental business, suggesting some accrual inflation.
CounterThe single beat in Q1 2026 showed a positive surprise of 8.6%, suggesting the miss trend may be reversing as analysts recalibrate expectations to a more challenging macro environment.
CounterStocks near 52-week highs in strong uptrends can continue to outperform if earnings revisions turn positive, and the strong technical momentum (RSI 76, rising OBV) suggests institutional buying remains active.
CounterElevated put-to-call ratios in liquid large-cap industrials sometimes reflect institutional hedging of long positions rather than outright bearish bets, and can be a contrary indicator of near-term bottoms.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.8 |
| P/S | 7.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.6 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.8 |
| PEG | 4.8 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 9.4 |
| ROA | 5.9 |
| Gross margin | 3.7 |
| Op margin | 9.2 |
| Net margin | 7.7 |
| Current ratio | 3.2 |
| FCF quality | 5.6 |
| Moat | 6.1 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.3 |
| EPS growth | 3.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 8.2 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 5.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 6.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.8 |
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 7.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.1 |
| quality rank | 8.2 |
| growth rank | 4.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 9.7 |
| support resistance | 8.7 |
| 52w position | 7.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.6 |
| days to cover | 8.1 |
| volatility | 4.1 |
| put call | 2.4 |
| implied vol | 2.2 |
| max pain risk | 5.0 |
| beta | 4.0 |
| debt equity | 3.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 2.1 |
| dividend safety | 7.5 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Earnings in 1 day. Wait until post-earnings.
L3:NEWS_BLOCK|ENTRY_STICKY:WITHIN_BANDSetupOversold Bounce — Oversold RSI 26, near Bollinger lower, volume surge
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.79>1.3
A recent news event triggered an L3 news-block on the verdict path. Trigger: Earnings in 1 day. Wait until post-earnings. The 10-dimension scores remain Technical at 8.7 (strongest), but ASYMMETRY:0.5<1.5@spot also fails — the news block is the proximate trigger, not the sole driver.
The strongest dimensions are Technical at 8.7, Sentiment at 6.8, and Quality at 6.5; the weakest are Growth at 3.8, Catalyst at 4.6, and Momentum at 4.7. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.50 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifReturn on equity falls below 20% in any of the next 4 reported quarters.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -5% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.
Trip ifPrice drops below $1,018, more than 6% below the current $1,084.
Trip ifPut-to-call ratio rises above 4.0, exceeding the current 3.41 level.