Value
8.8/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 15.9x
- ▸PEG: 0.07
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Universal Logistics Holdings screens as deeply undervalued and pays a supportive dividend, but customer concentration risk, declining revenue, and a below-floor quality score keep the fundamental picture weak.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Universal Logistics screens as attractively valued with a PEG ratio of 0.08 and a forward P/E of 16.6x. Valuation breakdown | The value-component score should hold at or above 7.0 (currently 8.7) over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA very low PEG in a trucking company facing declining revenue can reflect a legitimate market discount for cyclical freight-demand risk rather than a mispricing. | ||
The bear case flags a customer-concentration risk — the top ten customers represent 59% of revenue — a structural vulnerability the risk notes size as 1 HIGH concern. Bear case | No single customer loss or contract non-renewal among the top ten should occur over the next 12 months for this risk to stay contained. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh customer concentration is common in contract logistics and can reflect deep, sticky enterprise relationships rather than fragility. | ||
Universal Logistics' revenue growth notes flag a 4% YoY decline, contributing to a quality score (1.6) well below the platform's 4.0 floor. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth should turn positive over the next 12 months for the quality score to recover above the floor. | →Stable |
| CounterTrucking industry freight volumes are cyclical, and a modest revenue decline may reflect a broader sector downturn rather than company-specific weakness. | ||
The catalyst notes flag Universal Logistics as a dividend aristocrat yielding 2.2%, providing income support even amid the earnings and quality concerns. Catalyst breakdown | The dividend should be maintained without a cut over the next 12 months, preserving the aristocrat status. | →Stable |
| CounterA dividend aristocrat track record doesn't guarantee continuity if declining revenue and earnings concerns (2 misses in the last 4 quarters) persist. | ||
CounterA very low PEG in a trucking company facing declining revenue can reflect a legitimate market discount for cyclical freight-demand risk rather than a mispricing.
CounterHigh customer concentration is common in contract logistics and can reflect deep, sticky enterprise relationships rather than fragility.
CounterTrucking industry freight volumes are cyclical, and a modest revenue decline may reflect a broader sector downturn rather than company-specific weakness.
CounterA dividend aristocrat track record doesn't guarantee continuity if declining revenue and earnings concerns (2 misses in the last 4 quarters) persist.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.8 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.4 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.6 |
| Moat | 2.5 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.6 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 3.1 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 9.2 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 0.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.8 |
| support resistance | 8.0 |
| 52w position | 3.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.0 |
| days to cover | 2.6 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| beta | 8.5 |
| debt equity | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.7 |
| dividend safety | 8.5 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.5B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.5B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 2.5<4.5 outcome against Value at 8.8 and asymmetric R:R of -2.50.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.8, Technical at 6.6, and Growth at 5.8; the weakest are Quality at 1.6, Momentum at 2.5, and Peer rank at 2.7. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -2.50 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifValue-component score falls below 5.0 from the current 8.7.
Trip ifAny single top-ten customer accounting for more than 15% of revenue is lost or non-renewed within 12 months.
Trip ifRevenue growth stays negative (below 0%) for 2 consecutive quarters, extending the current -4% decline.
Trip ifThe company cuts its dividend payout by more than 10%, breaking the current aristocrat streak.