Value
5.8/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.1 |
| P/S | 8.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.6 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 16.3x
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Unilever generates 31% return on equity and 19% net margins, ranking at the top of its consumer products peer group on margin quality, which supports a durable business model over the medium term. Quality breakdown | ROE stays above 25% and net margins remain above 15% for the next 4 reported periods, sustaining the quality advantage | →Stable |
| CounterThe quality score of 6.5 is solid but not exceptional, and leverage at a debt-to-equity of 1.6 reduces the real ROE quality since it is partially balance-sheet-driven rather than purely operational | ||
The stock is trading at $58.69, already above the estimated resistance take-profit level of $57.94, with negative asymmetry ratio of -0.28 and negative upside of -1.3%, meaning there is no favorable risk-reward entry at current prices. Targets | Price pulls back below $55, more than 5% from current levels, before any new entry is considered favorable | →Stable |
| CounterAnalyst consensus may revise targets upward given the 3-out-of-4 earnings beat streak with an average positive surprise of 13.2%, which could restore positive upside | ||
The stock is in a confirmed downtrend with the 200-day moving average slope declining at 1.4% per 30 days and a death cross still recovering, indicating sustained selling pressure despite MACD improvement. Momentum breakdown | Price crosses back above the 200-day moving average within 6 months and MA slope turns positive, removing the downtrend classification | →Stable |
| CounterMACD is improving and momentum of 5.9 just clears the minimum threshold of 5.5, suggesting the worst of the downtrend may already be priced in | ||
A put/call ratio of 3.35 — among the highest bearish option positioning ratios in the dataset — indicates that a substantial portion of options market participants are positioned for further downside, creating meaningful sentiment headwinds. Options | Put/call ratio falls below 1.5 as the downtrend resolves and bearish positioning unwinds, signaling a sentiment shift within 12 months | →Stable |
| CounterExtremely elevated put/call ratios occasionally mark sentiment extremes and contrarian turning points, particularly for large-cap consumer staples names with loyal institutional ownership | ||
CounterThe quality score of 6.5 is solid but not exceptional, and leverage at a debt-to-equity of 1.6 reduces the real ROE quality since it is partially balance-sheet-driven rather than purely operational
CounterAnalyst consensus may revise targets upward given the 3-out-of-4 earnings beat streak with an average positive surprise of 13.2%, which could restore positive upside
CounterMACD is improving and momentum of 5.9 just clears the minimum threshold of 5.5, suggesting the worst of the downtrend may already be priced in
CounterExtremely elevated put/call ratios occasionally mark sentiment extremes and contrarian turning points, particularly for large-cap consumer staples names with loyal institutional ownership
Unilever PLC trades at a forward P/E of 15.1x with 31% return on equity and best-in-class margins of 19%, but the stock has already reached or exceeded the analyst price target leaving negative upside of -1.9%, and is in a confirmed downtrend below its 200-day moving average with an elevated put/call ratio of 3.35.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.1 |
| P/S | 8.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.6 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0 |
| ROA | 5.6 |
| Gross margin | 5.4 |
| Op margin | 8.0 |
| Net margin | 9.4 |
| Current ratio | 3.2 |
| FCF quality | 5.1 |
| Moat | 5.8 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 8.0 |
| Volume | 1.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 6.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.7 |
| quality rank | 8.5 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.1 |
| support resistance | 0.1 |
| 52w position | 7.0 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 8.6 |
| put call | 7.6 |
| implied vol | 7.7 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 3.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 9.1 |
| dividend safety | 5.0 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetupMomentum Cont — Trend continuation, RSI 69, MACD bullish
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 25d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.8 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 8.0) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.7=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.73 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 8.0, Momentum at 7.0, and Quality at 6.5; the weakest are Technical at 3.0, Insider at 5.0, and Growth at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.73 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifNet margins fall below 12% or ROE drops below 20% for 2 consecutive reported periods
Trip ifPrice rises above $62, more than 5% above the current $58.69, further exceeding the resistance target without analyst target revision
Trip ifPrice drops below $56.65 stop-loss level, more than 3% below current price
Trip ifPut/call ratio rises above 5.0 or remains above 3.0 for more than 90 days