Skip to main content
UAAUnder Armour, Inc.Sell4.9·$7.27-2.15%
UAA · Why this verdict

Why Under Armour (UAA) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Under Armour's class A voting shares show technical breakout signals and an extremely low PEG ratio of 0.21, but the business is burning cash at 11% of revenue, revenues are declining, and 30% short interest reflects substantial informed bearish conviction.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Short interest of 30% of the float is among the highest in the apparel sector, indicating that a significant proportion of informed investors are wagering that the stock will decline from current levels near $6.02.

Improving
Key risks
Expectation
Short interest falls below 20% within 12 months as bears cover on evidence that the turnaround is gaining traction.

CounterElevated short interest can fuel a short squeeze if positive news surprises emerge, as covering demand can amplify upward price moves well beyond fundamental fair value.

Free cash flow is negative at -11% of revenue, confirming the class A shares represent a stake in a business that is currently destroying capital rather than generating it, consistent with the quality score of 2.7 out of 10.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free cash flow turns positive and exceeds 3% of revenue within the next 12 months as operational restructuring delivers results.

CounterA current ratio of 5.9 and adequate liquidity suggest the business can sustain negative free cash flow for multiple years without facing an imminent funding crisis.

The class A shares have formed a golden cross with price above all moving averages and momentum scoring 6.3 out of 10, indicating that despite fundamental concerns, the technical structure is constructive in the near term.

Improving
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
Price sustains above the 200-day moving average for at least 6 months and on-balance volume continues to trend higher.

CounterThe moving average slope is described as flat, and with the stock already 6.1% above its analyst price target, the technical breakout has no fundamental anchor to sustain it.

Revenue declined 1% year over year and analyst earnings estimates fell 13.7% over the past 30 days, suggesting that the consensus view of future earnings power is eroding faster than any single quarter result can offset.

Stable
Sentiment breakdown
Expectation
Revenue returns to positive growth above 5% year over year and earnings estimate revisions turn positive within the next 2 quarters.

CounterManagement has historically delivered earnings beats well above the consensus estimate bar when set conservatively, as the 2021 track record of +300% average surprise demonstrates.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.3/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/S9.9
EV/EBITDA0.0
Fwd P/E3.8
PEG10.0
Analyst target3.0
  • Forward P/E: 31.0x
  • PEG: 0.26

Quality

2.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.0
ROA1.0
Gross margin5.1
Op margin3.5
Net margin0.0
Current ratio5.9
FCF quality0.0
Moat3.2
Piotroski F5.6
  • Cash-burning: FCF -11% of revenue
  • No competitive moat
  • Quality concerns

Growth

6.2/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth2.3
EPS growth10.0
  • Declining revenue: -1%

Momentum

6.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.4
MACD7.9
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume0.8
  • Overbought (RSI 72)
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

4.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target3.1
erm sentiment5.0
  • Below analyst target

Insider

8.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
materiality8.0
insider conviction8.0
holder change10.0
notable moves7.0
  • Notable insider buying — $5,869,079 (0.189% of mkt cap)
  • Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

2.0/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.0
quality rank0.0
growth rank0.7

Technical

3.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger1.0
support resistance1.2
52w position7.9

Risk (lower is worse)

2.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest0.0
days to cover4.0
volatility0.6
beta4.4
debt equity4.3
  • High short interest justified: 35%
  • Concentration risks: 3 HIGH, 3 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm3.5
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOOR
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:6.4>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:16d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.5=NEGATIVE
  • 8K_SERIOUS:2.05
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-1.49
Upside
-22.3%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive Beta 1.67>1.3, MCap $3.1B<$5B

Investment implication

The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's -1.5=NEGATIVE outcome against Insider at 8.2 and asymmetric R:R of -1.49.

The strongest dimensions are Insider at 8.2, Catalyst at 7.1, and Momentum at 6.4; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.0, Risk (lower is worse) at 2.7, and Quality at 2.7. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.49 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1High Short Interest 30 Pct

    Trip ifShort interest rises above 35%, more than 5 percentage points above the current 30% level, indicating bears are increasing conviction rather than capitulating.

  • P2Fcf Negative Cash Burning

    Trip ifFree cash flow remains below -8% of revenue for 2 consecutive quarters, confirming that the restructuring is not improving cash generation.

  • P3Technical Breakout Golden Cross

    Trip ifPrice falls below $5.60, the current stop-loss level of 7% below $6.02, breaking the technical breakout structure.

  • P4Declining Revenue Estimate Cuts

    Trip ifAnalyst earnings estimate revisions fall by more than 15% over any 30-day period, accelerating beyond the current -13.7% rate of downward revision.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks UAA Why this verdict