Value
4.0/10data confidence 60%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.4 |
| P/S | 7.6 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
TR · Why this verdict
Why Tootsie Roll Industries (TR) is rated BUY WAIT
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictBUY WAIT
Overall score4.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Tootsie Roll Industries is a low-volatility consumer defensive confectioner with a Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 and a strong technical setup at Bollinger Band support, but has a history of earnings misses and its most recent available quarterly data dates to 2014-2015, raising questions about the currency of the earnings track record used in analysis.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Volume is accumulating with rising on-balance volume despite the stock trading below its 200-day moving average, and the support and resistance technical score of 8.1 suggests the stock is near a historically meaningful support level that could provide a buying opportunity. Momentum breakdown | Price rises above the 200-day moving average within 9 months as volume accumulation translates into price recovery. | →Stable |
| CounterBelow-200-MA setups with rising on-balance volume can be momentum divergences that resolve lower rather than higher, particularly in low-growth consumer defensive stocks with no catalyst visible on the horizon. | ||
A Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 and strong Bollinger Band support score of 6.7 indicate that Tootsie Roll's financial fundamentals are sound across multiple dimensions and the stock is technically near a support zone that has historically attracted buyers. Quality breakdown | Piotroski F-Score remains at 7 or above through the next annual reporting cycle. | →Stable |
| CounterConsumer defensive confectioners with no recognized competitive moat can see Piotroski scores deteriorate if input cost inflation — cocoa, sugar, packaging — compresses margins faster than pricing can recover. | ||
The two most recent earnings misses and an average negative surprise of -1.4% across the available track record indicate that analyst consensus tends to overshoot Tootsie Roll's actual delivery, creating a pattern of modest but persistent disappointments. Earnings | Earnings surprises return to positive territory in at least 2 of the next 3 quarters as estimates are reset more conservatively. | →Stable |
| CounterThe earnings data in the analysis dates to 2014-2015, making it unclear whether the current miss pattern reflects recent business conditions or simply stale historical data; more recent reporting periods could show different results. | ||
Revenue and earnings growth are modest — in the low single digits — while the stock has no analyst coverage beyond a neutral rating, meaning Tootsie Roll is valued purely on its intrinsic earnings power without a catalyst for multiple expansion. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth turns positive and exceeds 3% year over year within 12 months, supporting modest upside to the $41.14 resistance target. | →Stable |
| CounterA confectioner with no meaningful growth, no moat, and stale analyst coverage may trade at a permanently compressed multiple; the 8.7% upside to resistance is achievable but may take longer than 12 months without a catalyst. | ||
Volume is accumulating with rising on-balance volume despite the stock trading below its 200-day moving average, and the support and resistance technical score of 8.1 suggests the stock is near a historically meaningful support level that could provide a buying opportunity.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- Price rises above the 200-day moving average within 9 months as volume accumulation translates into price recovery.
CounterBelow-200-MA setups with rising on-balance volume can be momentum divergences that resolve lower rather than higher, particularly in low-growth consumer defensive stocks with no catalyst visible on the horizon.
A Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 and strong Bollinger Band support score of 6.7 indicate that Tootsie Roll's financial fundamentals are sound across multiple dimensions and the stock is technically near a support zone that has historically attracted buyers.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Piotroski F-Score remains at 7 or above through the next annual reporting cycle.
CounterConsumer defensive confectioners with no recognized competitive moat can see Piotroski scores deteriorate if input cost inflation — cocoa, sugar, packaging — compresses margins faster than pricing can recover.
The two most recent earnings misses and an average negative surprise of -1.4% across the available track record indicate that analyst consensus tends to overshoot Tootsie Roll's actual delivery, creating a pattern of modest but persistent disappointments.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- Earnings surprises return to positive territory in at least 2 of the next 3 quarters as estimates are reset more conservatively.
CounterThe earnings data in the analysis dates to 2014-2015, making it unclear whether the current miss pattern reflects recent business conditions or simply stale historical data; more recent reporting periods could show different results.
Revenue and earnings growth are modest — in the low single digits — while the stock has no analyst coverage beyond a neutral rating, meaning Tootsie Roll is valued purely on its intrinsic earnings power without a catalyst for multiple expansion.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth turns positive and exceeds 3% year over year within 12 months, supporting modest upside to the $41.14 resistance target.
CounterA confectioner with no meaningful growth, no moat, and stale analyst coverage may trade at a permanently compressed multiple; the 8.7% upside to resistance is achievable but may take longer than 12 months without a catalyst.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.6 |
| ROA | 4.0 |
| Gross margin | 3.0 |
| Op margin | 4.8 |
| Net margin | 6.8 |
| Current ratio | 9.4 |
| FCF quality | 4.9 |
| Moat | 5.2 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Earnings quality warning: 64% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
2.3/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.0 |
| EPS growth | 1.6 |
Momentum
4.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 8.5 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 7.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA (recent, shallow — too early to call)
Sentiment
5.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
Insider
7.3/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
3.7/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.3 |
| quality rank | 5.0 |
| growth rank | 0.0 |
Technical
5.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.3 |
| support resistance | 4.8 |
| 52w position | 7.3 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.8 |
| days to cover | 3.5 |
| volatility | 4.8 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 5.3 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 9.9 |
- ▸Elevated put/call: 6.60
Catalyst
3.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| earnings history | 1.1 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 1.8 |
| dividend safety | 6.8 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 1B/2M
- ▸Earnings in 1 days
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Earnings in 1 day. Wait until post-earnings.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L3:NEWS_BLOCK|ENTRY_STICKY:WITHIN_BANDPassed (5)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
- MOMENTUM:4.2<4.5
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:1d<=7d
Warning (1)
- ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+0.0%
Downside
6.1%
Sizing output
STARTER
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 45
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $2.9B<$5B
Investment implication
A recent news event triggered an L3 news-block on the verdict path. Trigger: Earnings in 1 day. Wait until post-earnings. The 10-dimension scores remain Insider at 7.3 (strongest), but MOMENTUM:4.2<4.5 also fails — the news block is the proximate trigger, not the sole driver.
The strongest dimensions are Insider at 7.3, Quality at 5.6, and Risk (lower is worse) at 5.6; the weakest are Growth at 2.3, Catalyst at 3.7, and Peer rank at 3.7. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Solid Financial Health Metrics
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 5 in the next annual reporting cycle, signaling material financial health deterioration.
- P2Earnings Miss Pattern
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -10% in at least 2 of the next 3 quarters, indicating estimate misses are deepening.
- P3Technical Support Zone With Momentum
Trip ifPrice falls below $35.84 stop-loss, more than 5% below the current $37.86, and on-balance volume turns negative.
- P4Low Growth Moderate Valuation
Trip ifRevenue growth remains below 0% for 3 consecutive quarters, indicating the business is contracting rather than stagnating.