Value
5.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 3.5 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
TKNO · Why this verdict
Why Alpha Teknova (TKNO) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Alpha Teknova is a cash-burning, below-floor-quality small cap whose shares are already above the engine's target, leaving little upside despite narrowing losses and revenue growth.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Quality of 2.6 is below the 4.0 floor, with cash burn of 2% of revenue and no competitive moat. Quality breakdown | Quality score rises above 4.0 as free cash flow turns less negative over 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe current ratio (8.5) and Piotroski F-Score component (6.7) show a solid balance sheet that could fund the burn for years. | ||
The share price of $8.84 is already 11.4% above the target (upside of -11.4%), so no upside remains. Upside pct | Upside to target turns positive again only if earnings or resistance levels reset higher. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterThe target is a technical resistance level, not a fundamental valuation, and a breakout could simply reset it higher. | ||
Quarterly losses are narrowing: the latest EPS of -0.05 beat the -0.07 estimate, and four of the last four reports were in line or better. Earnings | Quarterly EPS loss shrinks further toward breakeven over the next four reports. | →Stable |
| CounterOnly 1 of the last 4 quarters was a true beat and the company still posts losses every quarter. | ||
Quarterly revenue reached $12.2M, up from $10.3M a year earlier, an increase of roughly 18%. Earnings | Quarterly revenue holds above $11.7M, in line with the next-quarter estimate, and keeps growing. | →Stable |
| CounterRevenue figures are provisional and the sequential rise may be lumpy rather than a durable trend. | ||
Short interest of 14% and a put/call ratio of 4.17 show the market is positioned against the stock. Key risks | Put/call ratio normalizes toward 1.0 as the bearish positioning unwinds. | →Stable |
| CounterOptions open interest reads as zero, so the put/call ratio may come from very thin volume and carry little information. | ||
Quality of 2.6 is below the 4.0 floor, with cash burn of 2% of revenue and no competitive moat.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Quality score rises above 4.0 as free cash flow turns less negative over 12 months.
CounterThe current ratio (8.5) and Piotroski F-Score component (6.7) show a solid balance sheet that could fund the burn for years.
The share price of $8.84 is already 11.4% above the target (upside of -11.4%), so no upside remains.
↓DeterioratingUpside pct
- Expectation
- Upside to target turns positive again only if earnings or resistance levels reset higher.
CounterThe target is a technical resistance level, not a fundamental valuation, and a breakout could simply reset it higher.
Quarterly losses are narrowing: the latest EPS of -0.05 beat the -0.07 estimate, and four of the last four reports were in line or better.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- Quarterly EPS loss shrinks further toward breakeven over the next four reports.
CounterOnly 1 of the last 4 quarters was a true beat and the company still posts losses every quarter.
Quarterly revenue reached $12.2M, up from $10.3M a year earlier, an increase of roughly 18%.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- Quarterly revenue holds above $11.7M, in line with the next-quarter estimate, and keeps growing.
CounterRevenue figures are provisional and the sequential rise may be lumpy rather than a durable trend.
Short interest of 14% and a put/call ratio of 4.17 show the market is positioned against the stock.
→StableKey risks
- Expectation
- Put/call ratio normalizes toward 1.0 as the bearish positioning unwinds.
CounterOptions open interest reads as zero, so the put/call ratio may come from very thin volume and carry little information.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
2.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 2.9 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 8.5 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
- ▸Cash-burning: FCF -2% of revenue
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
7.1/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 7.1 |
Momentum
3.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 6.4 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
7.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.6 |
| Price target | 8.7 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (6.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Analyst upside: 32%
Insider
7.3/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
3.7/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.3 |
| quality rank | 1.4 |
| growth rank | 6.2 |
Technical
5.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.3 |
| support resistance | 4.1 |
| 52w position | 5.5 |
Risk (lower is worse)
3.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 2.5 |
| days to cover | 5.1 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 7.0 |
| beta | 7.2 |
| debt equity | 8.2 |
- ▸Elevated put/call: 10.00
- ▸High IV: 150%
- ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
7.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
- ▸Earnings in 1 day
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORPassed (5)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
- MOMENTUM:3.4<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:1.0<1.5@spot
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:1d<=7d
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
0.96
Upside
+14.4%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRange Bound — RSI 47 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.4B<$5B
Investment implication
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 3.4<4.5 outcome against Catalyst at 7.5 and asymmetric R:R of 0.96.
The strongest dimensions are Catalyst at 7.5, Insider at 7.3, and Sentiment at 7.2; the weakest are Quality at 2.6, Momentum at 3.4, and Peer rank at 3.7. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.96 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Quality Below Floor
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 from current 2.6.
- P2Target Already Exceeded
Trip ifUpside to target rises above 10% from current -11.4%.
- P3Narrowing Quarterly Losses
Trip ifQuarterly EPS falls below -0.10 for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4Revenue Growth Recovery
Trip ifQuarterly revenue falls below $10M from current $12.2M.
- P5Short Interest And Put Skew
Trip ifPut/call ratio falls below 1.0 from current 4.17.