Value
7.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.9 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.6 |
| PEG | 8.6 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 16.2x
- ▸PEG: 0.73
- ▸Attractively valued
THO · Why this verdict
Why Thor Industries (THO) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Thor Industries' revenue declined approximately 4% year-over-year, reflecting the recreational vehicle industry contraction cycle, with a growth score of only 0.8 out of 10 placing the company at the bottom of its consumer-cyclical peer group on growth metrics. Growth | Revenue returning to positive growth above 5% year-over-year in the next reported annual period would indicate the RV industry cycle has bottomed and Thor is starting to benefit from pent-up demand. | →Stable |
| CounterThe RV industry is notoriously cyclical and tends to recover sharply when interest rates decline and consumer confidence improves, and Thor's dominant market position means it will capture the largest share of any recovery in unit volumes. | ||
Thor's quality score of 3.1 is substantially below the 4.0 minimum threshold, reflecting thin operating margins, no competitive moat identification, and free cash flow converting at only 56% of net income — metrics that collectively indicate the business lacks the financial resilience to withstand a prolonged cyclical downturn. Quality | Quality score improving above 4.0 — requiring improvement in at least 2 of gross margin, operating margin, or moat — within the next 4 quarters would indicate the business fundamentals are recovering in line with cycle improvement. | →Stable |
| CounterThor's market leadership in recreational vehicles creates barriers to entry through dealer relationships, scale economics, and manufacturing capacity that may not fully appear in standard moat metrics but represent durable competitive advantages. | ||
Thor Industries has triggered a hard-block death cross — where the 50-day moving average has fallen below the 200-day and the 200-day itself is declining at -3.2% per month — a technical configuration that has caused the engine to block any buy signal regardless of other positive factors. V9 | A confirmed reversal of the 200-day moving average to a positive slope over at least 30 consecutive trading days would signal the intermediate-term downtrend has ended and technical conditions are improving. | →Stable |
| CounterHard death-cross conditions in a cyclical consumer-discretionary name often coincide with the maximum pessimism point before a recovery, particularly if end-market demand for recreational vehicles is stabilizing at a trough. | ||
Despite the fundamental challenges, Thor trades at a forward price-to-earnings of 16.1x and a PEG of 0.74 against a peer-group value rank of 6.3 out of 10, suggesting the stock is priced to reflect the current downturn while implying significant earnings recovery in the forward estimates. Value | Forward P/E compressing below 12x — driven by earnings growth from cycle recovery — or the stock price rising by more than 20% toward the $80.91 analyst target would validate the value proposition within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterForward earnings estimates in cyclical companies during troughs are notoriously optimistic, and a PEG of 0.74 built on recovery assumptions that don't materialize becomes a much less attractive valuation very quickly. | ||
Thor Industries' revenue declined approximately 4% year-over-year, reflecting the recreational vehicle industry contraction cycle, with a growth score of only 0.8 out of 10 placing the company at the bottom of its consumer-cyclical peer group on growth metrics.
→StableGrowth
- Expectation
- Revenue returning to positive growth above 5% year-over-year in the next reported annual period would indicate the RV industry cycle has bottomed and Thor is starting to benefit from pent-up demand.
CounterThe RV industry is notoriously cyclical and tends to recover sharply when interest rates decline and consumer confidence improves, and Thor's dominant market position means it will capture the largest share of any recovery in unit volumes.
Thor's quality score of 3.1 is substantially below the 4.0 minimum threshold, reflecting thin operating margins, no competitive moat identification, and free cash flow converting at only 56% of net income — metrics that collectively indicate the business lacks the financial resilience to withstand a prolonged cyclical downturn.
→StableQuality
- Expectation
- Quality score improving above 4.0 — requiring improvement in at least 2 of gross margin, operating margin, or moat — within the next 4 quarters would indicate the business fundamentals are recovering in line with cycle improvement.
CounterThor's market leadership in recreational vehicles creates barriers to entry through dealer relationships, scale economics, and manufacturing capacity that may not fully appear in standard moat metrics but represent durable competitive advantages.
Thor Industries has triggered a hard-block death cross — where the 50-day moving average has fallen below the 200-day and the 200-day itself is declining at -3.2% per month — a technical configuration that has caused the engine to block any buy signal regardless of other positive factors.
→StableV9
- Expectation
- A confirmed reversal of the 200-day moving average to a positive slope over at least 30 consecutive trading days would signal the intermediate-term downtrend has ended and technical conditions are improving.
CounterHard death-cross conditions in a cyclical consumer-discretionary name often coincide with the maximum pessimism point before a recovery, particularly if end-market demand for recreational vehicles is stabilizing at a trough.
Despite the fundamental challenges, Thor trades at a forward price-to-earnings of 16.1x and a PEG of 0.74 against a peer-group value rank of 6.3 out of 10, suggesting the stock is priced to reflect the current downturn while implying significant earnings recovery in the forward estimates.
→StableValue
- Expectation
- Forward P/E compressing below 12x — driven by earnings growth from cycle recovery — or the stock price rising by more than 20% toward the $80.91 analyst target would validate the value proposition within 12 months.
CounterForward earnings estimates in cyclical companies during troughs are notoriously optimistic, and a PEG of 0.74 built on recovery assumptions that don't materialize becomes a much less attractive valuation very quickly.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Thor Industries is the largest recreational vehicle manufacturer in North America with an attractively valued forward price-to-earnings of 16.1x and a PEG of 0.74, but confirming a hard-blocked death cross technical pattern, declining revenue, and a quality score well below the minimum threshold create a deteriorating fundamental picture that outweighs the valuation appeal.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.0 |
| ROA | 1.5 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 1.4 |
| Net margin | 1.3 |
| Current ratio | 6.1 |
| FCF quality | 4.4 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
- ▸Earnings quality warning: 56% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
Growth
0.8/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.5 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -4%
Momentum
6.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 0.8 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -4.2%/30d — confirmed downtrend
Sentiment
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 7.8 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 22%
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
4.6/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.9 |
| quality rank | 4.5 |
| growth rank | 2.0 |
Technical
3.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.5 |
| support resistance | 3.6 |
| 52w position | 2.6 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.1 |
| days to cover | 5.2 |
| volatility | 2.4 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 4.3 |
| beta | 5.7 |
| debt equity | 9.1 |
- ▸Elevated put/call: 4.86
Catalyst
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 6.5 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
- ▸Dividend: 272.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:6.3>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:82d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:0.7<1.5@spot
Warning (1)
- DEATH_CROSS:momentum=6.3>=5.0 recovering
Reward-to-Risk
0.65
Upside
+5.8%
Downside
8.9%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 51
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.33>1.3, MCap $4.0B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 7.7 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:0.7<1.5@spot.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.7, Catalyst at 6.6, and Momentum at 6.3; the weakest are Growth at 0.8, Quality at 3.1, and Technical at 3.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.65 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Death Cross Confirmed Downtrend
Trip ifThe 200-day moving average slope remains below -2% per month for more than 60 consecutive trading days, confirming the death-cross downtrend is deepening rather than stabilizing.
- P2Revenue Decline In Weak Cycle
Trip ifRevenue declines by more than 8% year-over-year in the next annual report, indicating the RV cycle downturn is accelerating beyond current analyst expectations.
- P3Attractive Valuation In Cyclical Trough
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 25x without a corresponding improvement in revenue or earnings trajectory, indicating the valuation is expanding on declining fundamentals.
- P4Quality Below Threshold
Trip ifFree cash flow as a percentage of net income drops below 30% in any reported annual period, indicating the quality of earnings is deteriorating further from the current 56% level.