top ten suppliers
“10-K Item 1: 'In 2025, we purchased supplies from 233 suppliers, with 60% of supplies being purchased from our top ten suppliers and 12% of supplies being purchased from our largest supplier.'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Latham Group discloses is top ten suppliers at 60%, classified MEDIUM by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Latham Group’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'In 2025, we purchased supplies from 233 suppliers, with 60% of supplies being purchased from our top ten suppliers and 12% of supplies being purchased from our largest supplier.'”
“10-K Item 1: 'Our top ten dealer and distributor relationships accounted for 49.0% of our net sales in 2025'”
“10-K Item 1: 'Our largest distributor, which provides valuable local market support with a network of over 300 locations, accounted for 22.6% of our net sales in 2025'”
Latham Group's concentration risk runs on both the supply and customer sides. In 2025, the company purchased supplies from 233 suppliers, with 60% of supplies coming from its top ten suppliers and 12% from its single largest supplier — a meaningful reliance on a small group of vendors within an otherwise broad supplier base. On the customer side, the top ten dealer and distributor relationships accounted for 49.0% of net sales in 2025, with the largest distributor alone — described as providing valuable local market support through a network of over 300 locations — representing 22.6% of net sales. Both the supplier and dealer/distributor concentrations are dependency-type exposures tied to specific counterparties rather than structural industry features, meaning disruption of a top supplier or the largest distributor would have a more direct, idiosyncratic effect than a broad-based industry headwind. Of the two, the largest distributor relationship is disclosed at a comparatively smaller share than the top-ten groupings, but its scale still makes it the single most consequential named relationship in Latham's concentration profile.
For the engine’s reasoning on SWIM’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARLO | Arlo Technologies, Inc. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| AWI | Armstrong World Industries Inc | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| ASPN | Aspen Aerogels, Inc. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| SWIM● | Latham Group, Inc. | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| AAON | AAON, Inc. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| APOG | Apogee Enterprises, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.