Value
7.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.6 |
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 13.2x
- ▸PEG: 0.05
- ▸Attractively valued
SW · Why this verdict
Why Smurfit WestRock (SW) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Smurfit WestRock converts 358% of net income into free cash flow and has a Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9, but quality is marginally below the minimum threshold at 3.7 out of 10, the company has missed earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters by an average of 23.5%, and the stock trades near its analyst target with limited upside.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Smurfit WestRock has missed earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters, with an average surprise of negative 23.5% and the most recent miss of 17.4%, suggesting that either the business faces ongoing structural headwinds or analysts have not properly adjusted estimates for the post-merger integration costs. Earnings | The company beats earnings estimates in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, breaking the current 4-quarter miss streak and demonstrating that the guidance and execution gap is narrowing. | ↑Improving |
| CounterSmurfit WestRock is the result of a major merger and the integration is still ongoing; consistent misses during a post-merger period are common as costs and synergies are recognized on an unpredictable schedule. | ||
A quality score of 3.7, just below the minimum 4.0 floor, reflects thin operating margins of approximately 5%, a low ROE, and a net margin below 1%, suggesting the packaging business is not generating adequate returns on the capital employed in its large physical asset base. Warnings | Quality score improves above 4.0 within 12 months as operating margins expand through merger synergies and cost reduction programs. | ↑Improving |
| CounterPackaging companies generate the majority of their economic return through sustained cash flows rather than high GAAP margins; the thin net margin combined with exceptional FCF conversion argues that GAAP earnings are distorted by depreciation and amortization from the merger. | ||
With only 4.5% upside to analyst consensus targets and the stock trading at a negative risk/reward with potential downside of 7%, the current entry point offers minimal margin of safety even if the fundamental case is intact. Targets | Analyst consensus price target rises above $50, more than 12% above the current price of $44.51, following positive post-merger synergy announcements within 12 months. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterThe 4.5% near-term upside to the analyst target does not capture potential multiple expansion if merger synergies are realized and earnings growth eventually emerges from the current miss cycle. | ||
Smurfit WestRock converts 358% of net income into free cash flow, meaning the business generates far more actual cash than GAAP earnings suggest, reflecting the substantial non-cash depreciation on a large packaging asset base that does not require equivalent near-term cash reinvestment. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow conversion remains above 250% of net income over the next 12 months, confirming the structural cash generation advantage persists. | →Stable |
| CounterPackaging companies require continuous capital investment to maintain production equipment and facilities; if maintenance capex increases substantially, the FCF conversion ratio could compress rapidly to levels much closer to 100%. | ||
Smurfit WestRock has missed earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters, with an average surprise of negative 23.5% and the most recent miss of 17.4%, suggesting that either the business faces ongoing structural headwinds or analysts have not properly adjusted estimates for the post-merger integration costs.
↑ImprovingEarnings
- Expectation
- The company beats earnings estimates in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, breaking the current 4-quarter miss streak and demonstrating that the guidance and execution gap is narrowing.
CounterSmurfit WestRock is the result of a major merger and the integration is still ongoing; consistent misses during a post-merger period are common as costs and synergies are recognized on an unpredictable schedule.
A quality score of 3.7, just below the minimum 4.0 floor, reflects thin operating margins of approximately 5%, a low ROE, and a net margin below 1%, suggesting the packaging business is not generating adequate returns on the capital employed in its large physical asset base.
↑ImprovingWarnings
- Expectation
- Quality score improves above 4.0 within 12 months as operating margins expand through merger synergies and cost reduction programs.
CounterPackaging companies generate the majority of their economic return through sustained cash flows rather than high GAAP margins; the thin net margin combined with exceptional FCF conversion argues that GAAP earnings are distorted by depreciation and amortization from the merger.
With only 4.5% upside to analyst consensus targets and the stock trading at a negative risk/reward with potential downside of 7%, the current entry point offers minimal margin of safety even if the fundamental case is intact.
↓DeterioratingTargets
- Expectation
- Analyst consensus price target rises above $50, more than 12% above the current price of $44.51, following positive post-merger synergy announcements within 12 months.
CounterThe 4.5% near-term upside to the analyst target does not capture potential multiple expansion if merger synergies are realized and earnings growth eventually emerges from the current miss cycle.
Smurfit WestRock converts 358% of net income into free cash flow, meaning the business generates far more actual cash than GAAP earnings suggest, reflecting the substantial non-cash depreciation on a large packaging asset base that does not require equivalent near-term cash reinvestment.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Free cash flow conversion remains above 250% of net income over the next 12 months, confirming the structural cash generation advantage persists.
CounterPackaging companies require continuous capital investment to maintain production equipment and facilities; if maintenance capex increases substantially, the FCF conversion ratio could compress rapidly to levels much closer to 100%.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.9 |
| ROA | 1.6 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 2.6 |
| Net margin | 0.8 |
| Current ratio | 5.4 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 4.5 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 215% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
Growth
6.5/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
Momentum
7.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.0 |
| Volume | 5.4 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
7.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.1 |
| Analyst rating | 8.6 |
| Price target | 8.2 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 25%
Insider
6.1/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 6.2 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.7 |
| quality rank | 1.9 |
| growth rank | 3.9 |
Technical
2.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.3 |
| support resistance | 1.0 |
| 52w position | 6.8 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.5 |
| days to cover | 5.1 |
| volatility | 3.6 |
| put call | 8.6 |
| implied vol | 4.2 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 7.3 |
| debt equity | 6.3 |
| news risk | 6.0 |
- ▸Above max pain $25
Catalyst
3.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.8 |
| news activity | 6.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 0B/4M
- ▸Dividend: 4.2%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:7.5>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:98d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:1.2<1.5@spot
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
1.24
Upside
+12.4%
Downside
10.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's 1.2<1.5@spot outcome against Value at 7.5 and asymmetric R:R of 1.24.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.5, Momentum at 7.5, and Sentiment at 7.4; the weakest are Technical at 2.7, Catalyst at 3.5, and Quality at 3.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.24 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Exceptional Fcf Conversion Quality
Trip ifFree cash flow conversion falls below 150% of net income, declining more than 200 percentage points from the current 358% level.
- P2Persistent Earnings Miss Pattern
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below negative 10% in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, confirming the miss pattern is deepening rather than narrowing.
- P3Quality Below Floor Value Trap Risk
Trip ifQuality score falls below 3.0 for 2 consecutive quarters, declining more than 0.7 points from the current 3.7 and confirming structural deterioration.
- P4Limited Price Upside At Target
Trip ifPrice drops below $38, more than 14% below the current $44.51, indicating the market is pricing in a materially worse outcome than analyst targets suggest.