Skip to main content
SUPVGrupo Supervielle S.A.Sell4.8·$9.74-4.88%
SUPV · Why this verdict

Why Grupo Supervielle (SUPV) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Grupo Supervielle screens as deeply cheap with a constructive uptrend pullback, but a below-floor quality score, a string of earnings misses, and C-level insider selling temper the value case.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Quality sits far below the engine's floor at 1.3 versus a 4.0 minimum, with quality notes citing no competitive moat and broad quality concerns.

Deteriorating
Bear case
Expectation
The quality score should climb toward 4.0 as fundamental scoring stabilizes.

CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 5.6 is only moderately weak, suggesting some fundamental support beneath the very low headline quality score.

Shares trade at a forward P/E of 7.1x and an extremely low PEG of 0.02, with value scoring flagging the stock as attractively valued.

Improving
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The forward P/E should stay below 10x while earnings estimates hold, supporting a re-rating toward the sector average.

CounterConsistent earnings misses across the last 4 quarters, averaging a -274% surprise, suggest the cheap valuation may reflect deteriorating fundamentals rather than a bargain.

Momentum notes flag an uptrend pullback with RSI at 34, characterized as a buy opportunity, while the stock still trades above its 200-day moving average.

Deteriorating
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
RSI should recover above 50 within the next two months as the pullback resolves within the broader uptrend.

CounterThe momentum gate failed at 4.1 versus the 4.5 threshold, showing the engine views the current pullback as a genuine risk rather than purely a buying opportunity.

Insider selling of $82,620, though low in materiality, includes a C-level sale that contributes to an overall bearish insider signal.

Stable
Insider breakdown
Expectation
The insider signal should shift from bearish toward neutral as insider transactions moderate over the next quarter.

CounterThe dollar value is small relative to market cap (0.009%), so a single C-level sale may not represent a meaningful read on management's confidence.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

9.4/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
P/S10.0
Fwd P/E9.5
PEG10.0
Analyst target7.5
  • Forward P/E: 8.6x
  • PEG: 0.03
  • Attractively valued

Quality

1.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.0
ROA0.0
Gross margin0.0
Op margin0.0
Net margin0.0
Moat3.6
Piotroski F5.6
  • No competitive moat
  • Quality concerns

Growth

2.8/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth2.8

Momentum

5.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.5
MACD6.5
OBV10.0
MA position7.2
Volume0.0
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+5.8%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness

Sentiment

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target8.8
erm sentiment5.0
  • Analyst upside: 33%

Insider

4.8/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change4.5
notable moves5.0
  • Insider selling (low materiality) — $82,620 (0.009% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.0/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank10.0
quality rank0.1
growth rank0.8

Technical

5.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger4.6
support resistance4.9
52w position4.4
gap6.0

Risk (lower is worse)

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.5
days to cover7.3
volatility0.0
put call10.0
implied vol0.0
beta10.0
  • High IV: 139%

Catalyst

2.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history0.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.0
  • Earnings concerns: 0B/4M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOOR
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:5.6>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:18d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:1.2<1.5@spot
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
1.20
Upside
+15.4%
Downside
12.8%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRange Bound RSI 52 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band

EdgeInst Constrain Small cap ($1.0B) below institutional reach

SuitabilityAggressive MCap $1.0B<$5B

Investment implication

The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's 1.2<1.5@spot outcome against Value at 9.4 and asymmetric R:R of 1.20.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.4, Sentiment at 6.2, and Risk (lower is worse) at 5.8; the weakest are Quality at 1.3, Catalyst at 2.5, and Growth at 2.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.20 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Deep Value Low Peg

    Trip ifForward P/E rises above 15x from the current 7.1x.

  • P2Uptrend Pullback Opportunity

    Trip ifRSI stays below 30 for 2 consecutive months, failing to confirm the pullback thesis.

  • P3Quality Floor Breach

    Trip ifQuality score stays below 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P4C Level Insider Selling

    Trip ifC-level insider selling exceeds $500,000 over the next 90 days.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks SUPV Why this verdict