Value
9.4/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 8.6x
- ▸PEG: 0.03
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Grupo Supervielle screens as deeply cheap with a constructive uptrend pullback, but a below-floor quality score, a string of earnings misses, and C-level insider selling temper the value case.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Quality sits far below the engine's floor at 1.3 versus a 4.0 minimum, with quality notes citing no competitive moat and broad quality concerns. Bear case | The quality score should climb toward 4.0 as fundamental scoring stabilizes. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 5.6 is only moderately weak, suggesting some fundamental support beneath the very low headline quality score. | ||
Shares trade at a forward P/E of 7.1x and an extremely low PEG of 0.02, with value scoring flagging the stock as attractively valued. Valuation breakdown | The forward P/E should stay below 10x while earnings estimates hold, supporting a re-rating toward the sector average. | ↑Improving |
| CounterConsistent earnings misses across the last 4 quarters, averaging a -274% surprise, suggest the cheap valuation may reflect deteriorating fundamentals rather than a bargain. | ||
Momentum notes flag an uptrend pullback with RSI at 34, characterized as a buy opportunity, while the stock still trades above its 200-day moving average. Momentum breakdown | RSI should recover above 50 within the next two months as the pullback resolves within the broader uptrend. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterThe momentum gate failed at 4.1 versus the 4.5 threshold, showing the engine views the current pullback as a genuine risk rather than purely a buying opportunity. | ||
Insider selling of $82,620, though low in materiality, includes a C-level sale that contributes to an overall bearish insider signal. Insider breakdown | The insider signal should shift from bearish toward neutral as insider transactions moderate over the next quarter. | →Stable |
| CounterThe dollar value is small relative to market cap (0.009%), so a single C-level sale may not represent a meaningful read on management's confidence. | ||
CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 5.6 is only moderately weak, suggesting some fundamental support beneath the very low headline quality score.
CounterConsistent earnings misses across the last 4 quarters, averaging a -274% surprise, suggest the cheap valuation may reflect deteriorating fundamentals rather than a bargain.
CounterThe momentum gate failed at 4.1 versus the 4.5 threshold, showing the engine views the current pullback as a genuine risk rather than purely a buying opportunity.
CounterThe dollar value is small relative to market cap (0.009%), so a single C-level sale may not represent a meaningful read on management's confidence.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Moat | 3.6 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 6.5 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.2 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 8.8 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 4.5 |
| notable moves | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 10.0 |
| quality rank | 0.1 |
| growth rank | 0.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.6 |
| support resistance | 4.9 |
| 52w position | 4.4 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.5 |
| days to cover | 7.3 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 52 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.0B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.0B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's 1.2<1.5@spot outcome against Value at 9.4 and asymmetric R:R of 1.20.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.4, Sentiment at 6.2, and Risk (lower is worse) at 5.8; the weakest are Quality at 1.3, Catalyst at 2.5, and Growth at 2.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.20 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 15x from the current 7.1x.
Trip ifRSI stays below 30 for 2 consecutive months, failing to confirm the pullback thesis.
Trip ifQuality score stays below 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifC-level insider selling exceeds $500,000 over the next 90 days.