Value
3.5/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 3.7 |
| PEG | 3.4 |
- ▸PEG: 3.45
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The preferred share price of $74.99 is above the resistance take-profit level of $73.58, with negative upside of 1.9%, meaning investors entering at current prices are above fair value on a near-term technical basis with limited capital return potential. Targets | Price pulls back below $72, creating at least 4% downside from current levels to establish a more attractive entry point. | →Stable |
| CounterFor income-focused investors, the yield may justify holding above the technical resistance level if the dividend stream continues uninterrupted regardless of price fluctuation. | ||
The underlying issuer earns a 31% return on equity with 45% net margins and a strong current ratio of 4.9 times, providing solid corporate credit support for the preferred shares, which rank senior to the common equity in the capital structure. Quality breakdown | SLM Corporation's core earnings coverage of the preferred dividend remains above 5 times over the next 12 months, confirming the credit foundation remains intact. | →Stable |
| CounterPreferred holders benefit from priority claims but not from earnings upside; if the company's credit quality deteriorates due to rising student loan charge-offs, preferred holders face both credit risk and liquidity risk simultaneously. | ||
The underlying issuer is concentrated in private education loans, a single product category with structural regulatory and credit cycle sensitivity, which represents the primary risk to the preferred's income stream if the loan portfolio deteriorates materially. Risk breakdown | Net charge-off rates on the private loan portfolio remain below 3% annually, maintaining the corporate credit quality that underpins the preferred. | →Stable |
| CounterPreferred shares carry priority claim ahead of common equity holders; even in a moderate credit deterioration scenario, the preferred dividend would be maintained as long as the company remains solvent. | ||
The dividend coverage ratio is 796%, meaning the company's earnings cover the preferred dividend nearly 8 times over, suggesting the preferred income stream is extremely well-protected by current earnings levels. Catalyst breakdown | Dividend coverage ratio remains above 400% over the next 12 months, providing a wide buffer against earnings deterioration. | →Stable |
| CounterAn excessively high coverage ratio may indicate the preferred is an inefficient use of capital from the issuer's perspective; the company could elect to call or restructure the preferred at any point. | ||
CounterFor income-focused investors, the yield may justify holding above the technical resistance level if the dividend stream continues uninterrupted regardless of price fluctuation.
CounterPreferred holders benefit from priority claims but not from earnings upside; if the company's credit quality deteriorates due to rising student loan charge-offs, preferred holders face both credit risk and liquidity risk simultaneously.
CounterPreferred shares carry priority claim ahead of common equity holders; even in a moderate credit deterioration scenario, the preferred dividend would be maintained as long as the company remains solvent.
CounterAn excessively high coverage ratio may indicate the preferred is an inefficient use of capital from the issuer's perspective; the company could elect to call or restructure the preferred at any point.
SLM Corporation's floating rate preferred shares deliver the same underlying corporate credit quality as the common — 31% return on equity, 45% net margins — but trade above intrinsic value with negative upside to resistance and an exceptionally high dividend coverage ratio of 796%, suggesting the preferred is priced for income safety rather than capital appreciation.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 3.7 |
| PEG | 3.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0 |
| ROA | 1.7 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.9 |
| Moat | 6.4 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.1 |
| EPS growth | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 8.5 |
| MACD | 0.9 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 1.3 |
| quality rank | 7.8 |
| growth rank | 2.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 9.1 |
| support resistance | 3.9 |
| 52w position | 9.3 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| days to cover | 8.5 |
| volatility | 10.0 |
| beta | 7.3 |
| debt equity | 2.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.5 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.3 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Quality at 7.2) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:3.3<4.5) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.00 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Quality at 7.2, Technical at 7.1, and Risk (lower is worse) at 7.1; the weakest are Momentum at 3.3, Growth at 3.5, and Value at 3.5. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifReturn on equity at the corporate level falls below 15% in any annual reporting period.
Trip ifDividend coverage ratio falls below 300%, suggesting more than half the safety cushion has eroded.
Trip ifPreferred share price rises above $77, more than 2.7% above the current price of $74.99, compressing the yield further.
Trip ifCorporate net charge-off rate on the loan portfolio exceeds 3.5% in any reported quarter.