Skip to main content
SCHLScholastic CorporationSell4.6·$41.33
SCHL · Why this verdict

Why Scholastic (SCHL) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Scholastic's earnings beat streak and imminent catalyst are offset by declining revenue, an elevated growth-adjusted valuation, and a notably negative risk-adjusted asymmetry ratio, consistent with a call to consider reducing the position.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Scholastic has beaten consensus EPS in 3 of its last 4 quarters, with an earnings catalyst in 19 days built on that beat streak.

Stable
Edge rationale
Expectation
The company should beat consensus again in its upcoming report on 2026-07-23.

CounterRevenue is declining roughly 2% year over year, which could make it harder to sustain the beat streak on the top line even if EPS beats continue.

Scholastic's revenue is declining roughly 2% year over year.

TrippedStable
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Revenue growth should turn flat-to-positive within the next two reported quarters.

CounterA modest 2% revenue decline is within normal variation for a seasonal publishing business and may not indicate a structural growth problem.

Scholastic trades at a forward P/E of 17.4x with a PEG ratio of 1.61, a valuation that looks stretched given the declining revenue backdrop.

Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The PEG ratio should compress back toward 1.0 as either the multiple falls or growth accelerates.

CounterExcellent cash conversion of 185% FCF/NI and a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 suggest underlying financial strength that could justify a premium multiple despite the higher PEG.

The risk-adjusted asymmetry ratio is negative at -2.16, with the analyst target already reached and -24.9% implied upside against 11.5% downside, explaining the reduce-position stance.

Improving
Warnings
Expectation
The asymmetry ratio should turn positive as either price consolidates lower or analyst targets are revised upward.

CounterHigh short interest of 21% combined with an upcoming earnings beat catalyst could trigger a short squeeze that outpaces the negative fundamental asymmetry.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

6.3/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/E7.1
P/S10.0
EV/EBITDA3.7
Fwd P/E7.1
PEG4.5
  • Forward P/E: 17.7x
  • PEG: 2.03

Quality

4.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE2.2
ROA0.9
Gross margin7.3
Op margin5.7
Net margin1.8
Current ratio4.7
FCF quality7.0
Moat5.4
Piotroski F4.4
  • No competitive moat

Growth

0.5/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth0.9
EPS growth0.0
  • Declining revenue: -6%

Momentum

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI7.8
MACD0.7
OBV10.0
MA position4.0
Volume3.3
  • Uptrend pullback (RSI 37) - buy opportunity
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target5.2
erm sentiment5.0

Insider

5.6/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change8.7
notable moves3.0
  • No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
  • Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

3.7/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.3
quality rank1.7
growth rank1.7

Technical

7.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger7.0
support resistance8.1
52w position7.2

Risk (lower is worse)

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest2.2
days to cover6.0
volatility0.0
put call8.0
implied vol4.7
beta6.9
debt equity7.6
  • High short interest: 16%

Catalyst

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
dividend safety7.5
  • Strong earnings: 3B/1M
  • Dividend aristocrat: 2.4% yield

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:5.2>=4.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:37d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.3=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
  • MOMENTUM:5.2<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
Reward-to-Risk
-1.31
Upside
-13.6%
Downside
10.4%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive MCap $0.8B<$5B

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.6 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Technical at 7.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.3=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.31 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Technical at 7.4, Catalyst at 6.8, and Value at 6.3; the weakest are Growth at 0.5, Peer rank at 3.7, and Quality at 4.4. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.31 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Earnings Catalyst With Beat Streak

    Trip ifScholastic's EPS surprise falls below 0% in the report on 2026-07-23.

  • P2Declining RevenueTripped

    Trip ifRevenue growth falls below -8% YoY in a subsequent quarter.

  • P3Elevated Valuation Vs Growth

    Trip ifPEG ratio rises above 2.5 without a corresponding change in the growth outlook.

  • P4Negative Asymmetry Caps Add

    Trip ifThe risk-adjusted asymmetry ratio stays below -1.5 for 2 consecutive quarters.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks SCHL Why this verdict