Value
7.8/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.5 |
| PEG | 8.4 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 16.6x
- ▸PEG: 0.77
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Revenue is declining at negative 4% year-over-year, which signals that the hard seltzer and craft beer markets have contracted from pandemic-era peaks, challenging Boston Beer's ability to sustain volume levels that its brand positioning was built around. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth turns positive above 2% year-over-year within the next 2 quarters as product mix shifts to new innovation categories. | →Stable |
| CounterBoston Beer has successfully navigated market contractions before and has a history of brand repositioning; the current decline may be a temporary digestion of prior over-expansion rather than a permanent share loss. | ||
With short interest at 23% and a put/call ratio of 2.12, professional investors are positioned 2 to 1 for downside, reflecting skepticism about whether Boston Beer can reverse volume declines in a competitive beverage market. Risk breakdown | Short interest declines below 15% within 12 months as revenue stabilizes and removes the bearish fundamental thesis. | →Stable |
| CounterA 23% short interest creates significant squeeze potential if Boston Beer reports volume growth recovery, as short covering alone could drive a 15% to 20% upward move. | ||
Boston Beer beat earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of 15.96%, while generating a free cash flow yield of 19.5% and a free cash flow margin of 19%, indicating meaningful cash generation capacity relative to the company's size. Earnings | Earnings beat rate continues at 3 out of 4 quarters over the next year and free cash flow yield remains above 10%. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarter produced a 16.8% negative earnings surprise, suggesting margins are under unexpected pressure even as reported beats on other quarters look favorable. | ||
Boston Beer relies on single-sourced flavorings from one supplier for key products, meaning a supply disruption, price negotiation failure, or quality incident at that supplier could immediately impair production of branded products with no fallback source. Bear case | No supply disruption or material flavoring cost increase is disclosed in the next 12 months, indicating the supplier relationship remains stable. | →Stable |
| CounterSingle-source flavoring arrangements in beverages are common and often reflect proprietary recipe partnerships; the risk exists on paper but rarely materializes into material business disruptions. | ||
CounterBoston Beer has successfully navigated market contractions before and has a history of brand repositioning; the current decline may be a temporary digestion of prior over-expansion rather than a permanent share loss.
CounterA 23% short interest creates significant squeeze potential if Boston Beer reports volume growth recovery, as short covering alone could drive a 15% to 20% upward move.
CounterThe most recent quarter produced a 16.8% negative earnings surprise, suggesting margins are under unexpected pressure even as reported beats on other quarters look favorable.
CounterSingle-source flavoring arrangements in beverages are common and often reflect proprietary recipe partnerships; the risk exists on paper but rarely materializes into material business disruptions.
Boston Beer's strong earnings beat record and 19.5% free cash flow yield point to durable cash generation, but declining revenue of negative 4%, heavy short interest of 23%, and single-source flavoring concentration make this a challenged value play requiring top-line recovery evidence before conviction is justified.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.5 |
| PEG | 8.4 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 4.8 |
| Gross margin | 5.7 |
| Op margin | 2.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 3.7 |
| FCF quality | 6.0 |
| Moat | 3.2 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 4.0 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 8.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.9 |
| quality rank | 2.7 |
| growth rank | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.5 |
| support resistance | 4.1 |
| 52w position | 3.6 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 1.1 |
| days to cover | 4.7 |
| volatility | 2.5 |
| put call | 7.3 |
| implied vol | 4.5 |
| beta | 8.3 |
| debt equity | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| news activity | 6.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 48
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 18d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.9B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 7.8 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:1.2<1.5@spot.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.8, Catalyst at 6.5, and Sentiment at 5.7; the weakest are Peer rank at 1.4, Growth at 1.4, and Quality at 3.4. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.16 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below negative 15% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.
Trip ifRevenue growth remains below negative 5% year-over-year for at least 3 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 28% of float or price drops below $169.87, more than 7% below the current $182.66.
Trip ifA supply disruption causes production declines of more than 5% below plan in any quarter.