top 25 suppliers
“10-K Item 1A: 'our top 25 suppliers represented approximately 76% of our purchases.'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Ryerson Holding discloses is top 25 suppliers at 76%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Ryerson Holding’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1A: 'our top 25 suppliers represented approximately 76% of our purchases.'”
“10-K Item 1: 'no single customer, including their subcontractors, accounted for more than 6% of our sales, and our top 10 customers, including their subcontractors accounted for approximately 15% of our sales.'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'During 2025, the Chinese government terminated one of our land use rights agreements resulting in impairment of assets and disruptions to our business, the impact of which was not significant to the consolidated financial statements.'”
Ryerson Holding's concentration risk sits almost entirely on the supply side rather than the customer side. The top 25 suppliers represented approximately 76% of purchases — a high-share dependency that gives a relatively small group of suppliers considerable influence over Ryerson's input costs and availability. By contrast, the customer base is genuinely diversified: no single customer, including subcontractors, accounted for more than 6% of sales, and the top 10 customers together represented only about 15% of sales — a low-share concentration that limits the risk of losing any one buyer. A separate, smaller structural item involves China: the Chinese government terminated one of the company's land use rights agreements in 2025, causing an asset impairment and business disruption, though the company describes the financial impact as not significant. Netting these together, Ryerson's real concentration exposure is on the procurement side — a shock affecting its top suppliers would matter far more than any customer-specific event, given how broad and unconcentrated its customer base already is. The China land-rights issue is a disclosed, low-share, one-off structural matter rather than an ongoing dependency.
For the engine’s reasoning on RYZ’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESAB | ESAB Corporation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| ATI | ATI Inc. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| RYZ● | Ryerson Holding Corporation | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| CMC | Commercial Metals Company | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CRS | Carpenter Technology Corporatio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPGI | GPGI, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.