Value
7.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.2 |
| P/S | 9.6 |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.6 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.4 |
| PEG | 8.4 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 9.3x
- ▸PEG: 0.77
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Revenue grew 45% year-over-year and Gibraltar ranks as a growth leader among building products peers, benefiting from infrastructure and residential construction tailwinds that are driving demand for its solar, agtech, and infrastructure products. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth remains above 20% year-over-year for at least the next two quarters as solar energy installation volumes remain elevated and infrastructure product backlogs convert to revenue. | →Stable |
| CounterBuilding products revenue growth of 45% in any single year almost always includes a significant acquisition component or a one-time demand surge; sustaining that trajectory organically requires continuously winning new construction markets. | ||
A quality score of 2.9 out of 10 — below the 4.0 minimum threshold — combined with earnings misses in 2 of the last 4 quarters indicates that rapid revenue growth is not being translated into consistent profitability or free cash flow generation. Quality breakdown | Quality score improves to above 4.5 within 12 months as gross margin expansion from operating leverage converts revenue growth into earnings per share growth above consensus expectations. | →Stable |
| CounterAcquisitive growth companies typically show depressed quality metrics during integration periods; the low quality score may reflect accounting treatment of acquired assets rather than ongoing operational underperformance. | ||
The analyst consensus price target implies 70% upside from the current price of $40.48 to $58.37, which is one of the widest analyst-to-price gaps in the industrial sector — suggesting either the stock is deeply undervalued or that analysts have not yet updated targets to reflect the deteriorating quality metrics. Sentiment breakdown | Price closes more than 30% of the gap toward the $58 target within 12 months as earnings recover and the market re-rates on the growth trajectory. | →Stable |
| CounterWide gaps between current price and analyst targets in small-cap industrials often reflect stale analyst models; the 70% upside may represent outdated targets set before recent earnings misses rather than a genuine valuation opportunity. | ||
Despite improving MACD and rising on-balance volume, the stock trades below its 200-day moving average with a slope of -7.1% over 30 days and sits near its 52-week low, indicating the technical damage is severe and requires a fundamental catalyst to trigger reversal. Momentum breakdown | Price reclaims the 200-day moving average and sustains above it for at least 45 consecutive days, confirming the recovery pattern is real rather than a temporary bounce. | →Stable |
| CounterBuilding products stocks near 52-week lows with improving MACD are classic mean-reversion setups; the technical weakness combined with a wide analyst upside gap could compress sharply on any positive sector catalyst. | ||
CounterBuilding products revenue growth of 45% in any single year almost always includes a significant acquisition component or a one-time demand surge; sustaining that trajectory organically requires continuously winning new construction markets.
CounterAcquisitive growth companies typically show depressed quality metrics during integration periods; the low quality score may reflect accounting treatment of acquired assets rather than ongoing operational underperformance.
CounterWide gaps between current price and analyst targets in small-cap industrials often reflect stale analyst models; the 70% upside may represent outdated targets set before recent earnings misses rather than a genuine valuation opportunity.
CounterBuilding products stocks near 52-week lows with improving MACD are classic mean-reversion setups; the technical weakness combined with a wide analyst upside gap could compress sharply on any positive sector catalyst.
Gibraltar Industries is a building products company with 45% year-over-year revenue growth and 70% analyst upside to price targets, but a quality score well below the minimum acceptable threshold and two consecutive earnings misses indicate the rapid growth is not translating into durable business quality.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.2 |
| P/S | 9.6 |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.6 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.4 |
| PEG | 8.4 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.2 |
| ROA | 2.6 |
| Gross margin | 1.2 |
| Op margin | 2.4 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.2 |
| Moat | 4.9 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.2 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 0.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.7 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 6.5 |
| insider conviction | 8.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.2 |
| quality rank | 1.4 |
| growth rank | 9.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.4 |
| support resistance | 2.0 |
| 52w position | 1.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.4 |
| days to cover | 7.1 |
| volatility | 1.6 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 6.2 |
| debt equity | 3.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 1.1 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 1.3 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 68
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.3B) below institutional reach
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -42% (>40% off 52w high)
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 10.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Value at 7.8, and Sentiment at 6.5; the weakest are Technical at 2.0, Quality at 2.9, and Catalyst at 3.1. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.19 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 10% year-over-year in any reported quarter, indicating the construction tailwind is fading faster than the acquisition-driven baseline allows.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, confirming that quality deficiencies are structural rather than cyclical.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target is revised below $45, more than 20% below the current $58.37 target, indicating the wide upside gap is a reflection of stale overoptimistic estimates.
Trip ifPrice drops below $35, more than 13% below the current $40.48, confirming the downtrend is accelerating rather than stabilizing near the 52-week low.