Skip to main content
RGRSturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.Sell6.0·$37.40
RGR · Why this verdict

Why Sturm, Ruger & Company (RGR) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score6.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Sturm, Ruger screens as growth-adjusted cheap and conservatively financed with recent insider buying, but sub-floor quality, a failed momentum gate, and a persistent earnings-miss streak suggest the market's caution may be well founded.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Ruger trades at a forward P/E of 19.0x but an unusually low PEG ratio of 0.05, suggesting that relative to its modest earnings growth trajectory, the market may be underpricing the stock's growth-adjusted value.

Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The PEG ratio should stay well below 0.5 as earnings growth is realized, or the forward P/E should compress if growth disappoints.

CounterA PEG this low on a mature firearms manufacturer with only 3.5% revenue growth likely reflects a temporarily depressed earnings base rather than genuine undervaluation.

Business quality sits below the engine's minimum floor (2.6 versus 4.0), reflecting no competitive moat and weak overall quality metrics for what is otherwise a conservatively financed manufacturer.

Improving
Bear case
Expectation
The quality score should recover above the 4.0 floor as margins stabilize or improve.

CounterFirearms is a mature, cyclical industry where moat-based quality scoring may understate the value of Ruger's brand recognition and distribution network, both of which are hard to quantify in these metrics.

The stock is below its 200-day moving average, but that average is still rising (+1.8% over 30 days), which the engine reads as a pullback within an uptrend rather than a confirmed trend reversal.

Deteriorating
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
The stock should reclaim its 200-day moving average within a few months if the pullback thesis is correct, without the moving average itself turning negative.

CounterFalling on-balance volume during the pullback could instead be an early warning that the uptrend is losing conviction and about to roll over into a genuine downtrend.

Ruger has missed consensus estimates in 3 of its last 4 quarters with an average surprise of -24.8%, indicating persistent earnings underperformance versus analyst expectations.

Deteriorating
Avg surprise pct
Expectation
The company should meet or beat consensus at its next report, breaking the miss streak.

CounterConsistent misses in a cyclical, promotion-sensitive business like firearms may simply reflect analysts overestimating demand each quarter, a pattern that could easily continue.

Insiders have been net buyers recently (signal: bullish, $288,615 across 3 purchases over 90 days), a modest positive signal that stands in contrast to the otherwise weak quality and momentum picture.

Deteriorating
Insider transaction read
Expectation
Insider buying should continue or at minimum not reverse into net selling over the next quarter.

CounterAt only 0.048% of market cap, this buying is too small to carry strong signal value and may reflect routine compensation-related purchases rather than a conviction bet.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.1/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/E2.5
P/S9.6
EV/EBITDA3.1
Fwd P/E6.9
PEG10.0
  • Forward P/E: 18.4x
  • PEG: 0.11
  • Attractively valued

Quality

4.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE1.4
ROA1.0
Gross margin0.0
Op margin2.1
Net margin1.1
Current ratio9.7
FCF quality10.0
Moat6.4
Piotroski F8.9
  • Excellent cash conversion: 309% FCF/NI
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

8.7/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth7.3
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

1.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.5
MACD2.0
OBV1.0
MA position1.0
Volume0.0
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Below 200-MA, MA slope -1.8%/30d — confirmed downtrend

Sentiment

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.9
Price target7.1
erm sentiment5.0
  • Light analyst coverage (2.0) — signal dampened

Insider

7.5/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.5
holder change10.0
notable moves7.0
  • Insider buying (low materiality) — $98,615 (0.017% of mkt cap)
  • Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

5.8/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank6.4
quality rank2.6
growth rank4.7
  • Conservative debt levels

Technical

7.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger8.0
support resistance8.2
52w position5.6

Risk (lower is worse)

7.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.2
days to cover6.9
volatility4.8
put call7.2
implied vol5.1
beta10.0
debt equity10.0

Catalyst

3.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history0.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.0
dividend safety5.8
  • Earnings concerns: 1B/3M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Mixed signals. Hold existing position. | News modifier -1 (HOLD_IF_HOLDING → SELL_IF_HOLDING).

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD_DEFAULT|L3:NEWS_MOD=-1
Passed (6)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:78d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:1.7<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.4=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.37
Upside
-2.3%
Downside
6.2%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeInst Constrain Small cap ($0.6B) below institutional reach

SuitabilityAggressive MCap $0.6B<$5B

Investment implication

The default F-path HOLD fired without any positive-conviction gate triggering — no momentum acceleration, no quality+value crossover, no setup recognition. Highest-clear gate: INSIDER:OK. Top dim: Growth at 8.7; weakest: Momentum at 1.7. The engine's read is one of pattern absence — no directional conviction in either direction at current asymmetry.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 8.7, Insider at 7.5, and Risk (lower is worse) at 7.5; the weakest are Momentum at 1.7, Catalyst at 3.2, and Quality at 4.5. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.37 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Growth Adjusted Cheap Valuation

    Trip ifForward P/E rises above 25x without a corresponding increase in earnings growth above 5%.

  • P2Quality Below Floor

    Trip ifQuality score stays below 3.0 out of 10 for 2 consecutive quarterly refreshes.

  • P3Pullback Not Confirmed Weakness

    Trip ifThe 200-day moving average slope turns negative (falls below 0%) over the next 30 days.

  • P4Earnings Miss Pattern

    Trip ifThe company misses consensus EPS by more than 15% for a 4th consecutive quarter.

  • P5Recent Insider Buying

    Trip ifInsiders become net sellers, with sell value that exceeds $500,000 over a rolling 90-day period.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks RGR Why this verdict