Value
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.1 |
| P/S | 7.4 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.1 |
| PEG | 5.2 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 14.8x
- ▸PEG: 1.45
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Despite strong net income and operating margins, Royal Caribbean has a negative free cash flow ratio of negative 4% relative to net income, flagged as a red flag in quality assessment — meaning the company's reported profitability does not translate to cash generation, likely due to heavy ongoing capital expenditure for fleet expansion. Components | Free cash flow as a percentage of net income improves to above 50% within 12 months as the new ship delivery cycle moderates. | →Stable |
| CounterFleet expansion capital expenditure is a planned growth investment rather than an operational quality problem, and ship investments typically generate strong long-term returns as vessels enter revenue service. | ||
Royal Caribbean carries a wide economic moat designation with ROE of 50%, operating margins of 24%, and a Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 — placing it among best-in-class performers in its peer group on both ROE and margins, and indicating the cruise business generates unusually strong returns on capital when operating at scale. Quality breakdown | Return on equity remains above 40% over the next 12 months and operating margins hold above 20%, confirming that the moat is durable through the current cycle. | →Stable |
| CounterAn ROE of 50% partially reflects the high financial leverage in the business (debt-to-equity score of 2.8 out of 10 implies elevated leverage), and elevated leverage amplifies returns in good times while compressing them rapidly in downturns or travel demand shocks. | ||
Royal Caribbean has beaten earnings estimates in three of the last four quarters with an average positive surprise of 5.3%, including a beat of 12.6% in the most recent quarter, demonstrating consistent delivery against analyst expectations across various demand environments. Earnings | Royal Caribbean continues to beat earnings estimates in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, with average surprise above 3%. | →Stable |
| CounterThe average beat magnitude of 5.3% is modest and the one inline quarter at only 0.13% upside suggests analysts have largely caught up to the company's operating cadence, leaving little room for positive revisions. | ||
The current price of $313.67 is above the analyst price target zone, producing a negative upside of 1.4% to take-profit and an asymmetry ratio of negative 0.23 — confirming that even consensus bulls have already been rewarded and the risk-reward setup for new buyers is unfavorable. Targets | Analyst price targets rise above $325 within 12 months, restoring positive upside asymmetry and providing a new catalyst for position initiation. | →Stable |
| CounterMomentum remains strong with a score of 7.3, RSI of 69, and MACD bullish — which in practice means the stock can remain above analyst targets for extended periods when institutional momentum flows are favorable. | ||
CounterFleet expansion capital expenditure is a planned growth investment rather than an operational quality problem, and ship investments typically generate strong long-term returns as vessels enter revenue service.
CounterAn ROE of 50% partially reflects the high financial leverage in the business (debt-to-equity score of 2.8 out of 10 implies elevated leverage), and elevated leverage amplifies returns in good times while compressing them rapidly in downturns or travel demand shocks.
CounterThe average beat magnitude of 5.3% is modest and the one inline quarter at only 0.13% upside suggests analysts have largely caught up to the company's operating cadence, leaving little room for positive revisions.
CounterMomentum remains strong with a score of 7.3, RSI of 69, and MACD bullish — which in practice means the stock can remain above analyst targets for extended periods when institutional momentum flows are favorable.
Royal Caribbean has a wide economic moat, ROE of 50%, strong operating margins of 24%, and has beaten earnings in three of the last four quarters — but the stock has run past analyst price targets, carries debt-to-equity risk at 2.2 times, and generates negative free cash flow relative to net income, making the current price an unfavorable entry point despite strong fundamental quality.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.1 |
| P/S | 7.4 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.1 |
| PEG | 5.2 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0 |
| ROA | 5.4 |
| Gross margin | 6.2 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 0.8 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 7.5 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.3 |
| EPS growth | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 5.0 |
| Volume | 1.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 6.7 |
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 6.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.5 |
| quality rank | 8.4 |
| growth rank | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.8 |
| support resistance | 5.5 |
| 52w position | 6.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.5 |
| days to cover | 6.4 |
| volatility | 0.3 |
| put call | 6.4 |
| implied vol | 3.5 |
| beta | 4.1 |
| debt equity | 2.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 54 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.76>1.3
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.2 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Sentiment at 7.1) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:2.7<4.5, ASYMMETRY:0.2<1.5@spot, DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.23 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 7.1, Growth at 6.5, and Quality at 6.4; the weakest are Momentum at 2.7, Risk (lower is worse) at 4.3, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.23 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifReturn on equity falls below 30% in any single quarter, indicating the high-leverage business model is underperforming through a demand or cost headwind.
Trip ifEarnings surprise falls below -5% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, breaking the positive beat streak that has anchored the premium multiple.
Trip ifFree cash flow as a percentage of net income remains below 0% for 3 or more consecutive quarters, indicating capital expenditure demands are structurally impairing cash conversion.
Trip ifStock price rises above $330 while analyst consensus price target remains below $320, widening the overvaluation gap to more than 3% above consensus.