Skip to main content
RCIRogers Communication, Inc.Sell5.9·$36.44
RCI · Why this verdict

Why Rogers Communication (RCI) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Rogers Communications trades at a forward price-to-earnings of 10.7x with an excellent return on equity of 41% and strong operating margins of 32%, but earnings are expected to decline approximately 61% as the current period likely represents a cyclical peak — making valuation misleading and the near-term downside risk more significant than the headline multiples suggest.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Rogers has an ROE of 41%, operating margins of 32%, a Piotroski F-Score of approximately 6.7 out of 9, and ranks in the top decile among peers on both ROE and quality — indicating the underlying business is well-run and generates strong returns on capital even if near-term earnings face cyclical pressure.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Return on equity remains above 30% over the next 12 months, confirming that capital allocation quality is not deteriorating alongside the cyclical earnings headwind.

CounterA debt-to-equity score of only 3.3 out of 10 implies high leverage relative to peers, and high leverage in a cyclical downturn amplifies downside to earnings and equity returns.

Rogers's forward price-to-earnings ratio of 10.7x is 2.6 times higher than its trailing price-to-earnings of approximately 4x, which signals analysts expect earnings to decline sharply — estimated at approximately 61% — as the current period represents a cyclical high rather than a stable run rate.

Stable
Warnings
Expectation
Earnings per share stabilize and do not decline more than 30% in the next four quarters, indicating the cyclical earnings peak was less severe than the forward multiple implied.

CounterCanadian telecoms have historically maintained high earnings stability supported by oligopolistic market structure, and the forward earnings decline may be an analyst-model artifact rather than a business reality.

The current price of $38.86 is already above the analyst price target zone, resulting in a negative upside of 11.5% to the take-profit target and an asymmetry ratio of negative 1.11 — meaning the risk-reward profile does not favor adding or initiating a position at current levels.

Stable
V9
Expectation
Stock price declines to below $35 within 12 months, providing a more favorable entry point with positive upside asymmetry restored.

CounterStrong momentum with a momentum score of 7.0 and RSI of 68 suggests the stock still has near-term upward momentum that could temporarily push prices even further above analyst targets before any mean reversion.

Rogers has beaten earnings in 2 of the last 4 quarters but also missed in 2, including the most recent quarter where the actual result came in slightly below the estimate of $1.02 — indicating that despite a high average surprise driven by one outsized beat of 1,159%, underlying earnings consistency is not strong.

Deteriorating
Earnings
Expectation
Rogers beats earnings estimates in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters with consistent positive surprises above 5%, indicating the cyclical peak concern is overblown.

CounterThe 1,159% earnings beat in one quarter was likely a one-time item that elevated the average surprise well beyond the sustainable trend and should not be treated as evidence of systematic outperformance.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.6/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/E10.0
P/S9.7
EV/EBITDA7.5
Fwd P/E9.2
Analyst target4.0
  • Forward P/E: 10.4x
  • Attractively valued

Quality

6.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE10.0
ROA2.6
Gross margin4.9
Op margin8.9
Net margin10.0
Current ratio2.2
FCF quality9.1
Moat6.1
Piotroski F6.7
  • Excellent ROE: 31%
  • Strong margins: 27%
  • Excellent cash conversion: 123% FCF/NI

Growth

4.4/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth4.4

Momentum

6.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.0
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position7.5
Volume2.1
  • Overbought (RSI 80)
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Above 200-MA but MA slope flat/negative + RSI 80 (late-cycle distribution risk)

Sentiment

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating6.1
Price target7.3
erm sentiment5.1
  • Light analyst coverage (3.0) — signal dampened

Insider

5.0/10data confidence 50%

Peer rank

6.7/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank6.7
quality rank9.6
growth rank7.6
  • Attractive P/E vs peers
  • Superior ROE vs peers

Technical

2.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.3
support resistance0.5
52w position8.0

Risk (lower is worse)

4.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
days to cover1.4
volatility7.2
put call10.0
implied vol1.3
max pain risk3.0
beta8.2
debt equity3.0
  • High IV: 72%
  • Above max pain $25

Catalyst

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg4.8
dividend safety7.5
  • Strong earnings: 3B/1M
  • Dividend aristocrat: 3.9% yield

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:6.7>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:67d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.1=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
  • DEATH_CROSS:momentum=6.7>=5.0 recovering
Reward-to-Risk
-0.05
Upside
-0.6%
Downside
11.5%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRecovery Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 80

EdgeNo clear edge No clear edge identified

SuitabilityModerate Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.9 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 7.6) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.1=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.05 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.6, Quality at 6.7, and Momentum at 6.7; the weakest are Technical at 2.9, Growth at 4.4, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.05 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Cyclical Earnings Peak Risk

    Trip ifEarnings per share falls below $0.50 in any quarter over the next 12 months, confirming the cyclical earnings decline is materializing as the forward multiple implied.

  • P2Strong Quality Metrics Telecom

    Trip ifReturn on equity drops below 25% in any single reporting period, indicating the high-quality business metrics are deteriorating alongside earnings pressure.

  • P3Negative Price Asymmetry

    Trip ifStock price rises above $42 without analyst price target upgrades above $45, indicating the negative asymmetry situation is becoming even more unfavorable.

  • P4Mixed Earnings Surprise Record

    Trip ifEarnings surprise falls below -10% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, confirming persistent earnings miss pattern beyond the most recent quarter.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks RCI Why this verdict
Why TrendMatrix rates RCI the way it does — verdict reasoning