Value
7.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.8 |
| P/S | 9.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 11.2x
- ▸PEG: 0.17
QNST · Why this verdict
Why QuinStreet (QNST) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score6.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
QuinStreet combines a wide moat, strong cash conversion, and 28% revenue growth with an attractive valuation, but shares are deeply overbought with late-cycle distribution risk, and a thin 4.5% upside margin leaves the reward-to-risk ratio well short of the 1.5-to-1 bar.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The bear case flags a thin upside margin of about 4.5% to the take-profit level, and the reward-to-risk ratio of about 0.3-to-1 falls well short of the 1.5-to-1 bar the engine looks for. Bear case | The reward-to-risk ratio should climb back above the 1.5-to-1 bar, either from a lower entry price or a higher target, confirming a stronger asymmetry than today's reading. | ↑Improving |
| CounterThe stock's growth and quality characteristics could still support the analyst-implied target moving higher over time, which would widen the currently thin upside margin without the downside risk changing. | ||
The business shows a wide competitive moat and has combined strong returns with growth in a way that suggests compounding characteristics, backed by a strong Piotroski score of 7 out of 9 and excellent cash conversion near 166% of net income. Quality breakdown | The moat and quality characteristics should persist — cash conversion should stay strong and the Piotroski score should hold near its current level — over the next 12 months. | ↑Improving |
| CounterThe stock is still flagged for below-average business quality among the key risks, and this moat read sits in tension with that broader quality flag, so the picture isn't uniformly positive. | ||
Revenue is growing strongly, up about 28% year over year, supporting the bull case built around a strong growth profile. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth should stay near or above the current 28% pace over the next 12 months if the growth trajectory is durable. | ↑Improving |
| CounterThe stock is overbought with an RSI near 94 and flagged for late-cycle distribution risk, which could mean the growth story is already substantially priced in. | ||
Shares are deeply overbought with an RSI near 94, and while still above the 200-day moving average, that average's slope has gone flat to slightly negative — a combination flagged as late-cycle distribution risk rather than a confirmed reversal. Momentum breakdown | For this risk to ease, RSI should cool off from its extreme reading while the 200-day moving average slope turns clearly positive again over the next 12 months. | ↑Improving |
| CounterOn-balance volume is still rising even at this overbought extreme, showing accumulation rather than distribution in the actual trading activity, which cuts against the late-cycle risk read. | ||
The bear case flags a thin upside margin of about 4.5% to the take-profit level, and the reward-to-risk ratio of about 0.3-to-1 falls well short of the 1.5-to-1 bar the engine looks for.
↑ImprovingBear case
- Expectation
- The reward-to-risk ratio should climb back above the 1.5-to-1 bar, either from a lower entry price or a higher target, confirming a stronger asymmetry than today's reading.
CounterThe stock's growth and quality characteristics could still support the analyst-implied target moving higher over time, which would widen the currently thin upside margin without the downside risk changing.
The business shows a wide competitive moat and has combined strong returns with growth in a way that suggests compounding characteristics, backed by a strong Piotroski score of 7 out of 9 and excellent cash conversion near 166% of net income.
↑ImprovingQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- The moat and quality characteristics should persist — cash conversion should stay strong and the Piotroski score should hold near its current level — over the next 12 months.
CounterThe stock is still flagged for below-average business quality among the key risks, and this moat read sits in tension with that broader quality flag, so the picture isn't uniformly positive.
Revenue is growing strongly, up about 28% year over year, supporting the bull case built around a strong growth profile.
↑ImprovingGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth should stay near or above the current 28% pace over the next 12 months if the growth trajectory is durable.
CounterThe stock is overbought with an RSI near 94 and flagged for late-cycle distribution risk, which could mean the growth story is already substantially priced in.
Shares are deeply overbought with an RSI near 94, and while still above the 200-day moving average, that average's slope has gone flat to slightly negative — a combination flagged as late-cycle distribution risk rather than a confirmed reversal.
↑ImprovingMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- For this risk to ease, RSI should cool off from its extreme reading while the 200-day moving average slope turns clearly positive again over the next 12 months.
CounterOn-balance volume is still rising even at this overbought extreme, showing accumulation rather than distribution in the actual trading activity, which cuts against the late-cycle risk read.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 9.5 |
| ROA | 2.6 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 2.0 |
| Net margin | 3.1 |
| Current ratio | 4.7 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 7.5 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Excellent ROE: 29%
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 150% FCF/NI
- ▸Wide economic moat
- ▸Compounder quality: strong returns + growth
Growth
10.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong growth: 43% YoY
Momentum
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.2 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.8 |
- ▸Overbought (RSI 77)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 6.5 |
| Analyst rating | 7.3 |
| Price target | 6.3 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (5.0) — signal dampened
Insider
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
- ▸Modest insider selling — $423,945 (0.035% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
7.0/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.0 |
| quality rank | 7.6 |
| growth rank | 7.3 |
- ▸Superior ROE vs peers
Technical
4.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.9 |
| support resistance | 2.3 |
| 52w position | 8.5 |
| gap | 6.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.5 |
| days to cover | 3.8 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 3.8 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 7.0 |
| beta | 9.0 |
| debt equity | 9.1 |
- ▸High IV: 83%
Catalyst
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 7.1 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_HOLDPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:6.8>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:85d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-0.4=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-0.36
Upside
-5.4%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.2B<$5B
Investment implication
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:6.8>=5.5. Top dim: Growth at 10.0; weakest: Technical at 4.4. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Value at 7.0, and Peer rank at 7.0; the weakest are Technical at 4.4, Risk (lower is worse) at 4.7, and Quality at 5.2. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.36 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Wide Moat Quality Characteristics
Trip ifThe Piotroski F-Score falls below 4 out of 9, down from the current 7.
- P2Strong Revenue Growth
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 10% YoY, down from the current 28% pace.
- P3Overbought Late Cycle Risk
Trip ifRSI falls below 70, cooling from the current overbought reading near 94.
- P4Thin Upside Failed Asymmetry
Trip ifThe reward-to-risk ratio rises above 1.5-to-1 from the current 0.3-to-1.