Skip to main content
QCOMQUALCOMM IncorporatedSell5.1·$165.55
QCOM · Why this verdict

Why QUALCOMM (QCOM) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.1/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

QUALCOMM combines a perfect 4-for-4 earnings beat streak, 36% return on equity, 22% net margins, and a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 with a PEG of 0.94, but the stock trades well above analyst price targets implying -23.9% downside, and recent news from an analyst cluster of 3 has not been sufficient to resolve the negative asymmetry.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

QUALCOMM delivers 36% return on equity, 22% net margins, a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, and ranks superior to peers on both value and quality (ROE rank 7.9/10, quality rank 7.9/10), placing it among the highest-quality businesses in the semiconductor sector.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Return on equity remains above 30% and net margins stay above 18% over the next 12 months.

CounterDespite high quality metrics, revenue has declined -4% year over year and overall growth scores are low at 5.8, suggesting the quality engine is not yet driving top-line expansion.

QUALCOMM has beaten analyst estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of 4%, demonstrating consistent execution in a complex and competitive semiconductor supply chain environment.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
Earnings beats continue in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters as the company maintains cost discipline and licensing revenues remain stable.

CounterAn average surprise of only 4% is modest, and with estimates likely adjusted upward after 4 consecutive beats, maintaining the streak becomes harder while the incremental signal weakens.

The current price of $220.81 implies -23.9% downside to the resistance-based take profit target of $253.78 when framed against the current price-to-target gap, and the asymmetry ratio is -1.59, meaning expected downside exceeds upside at spot, making this a position to hold rather than add.

TrippedStable
Targets
Expectation
Analyst targets rise above $250 within 12 months to restore positive asymmetry and create a fresh entry opportunity.

CounterA resistance-based take profit that is below the current price reflects a conservatively set technical target; analyst fundamental targets may be revised higher by the analyst cluster that has recently been detected in the news.

A cluster of 3 analyst actions has been detected in recent news with positive LLM sentiment of +0.53 across 7 articles, suggesting increased institutional attention that could serve as a catalyst for re-rating if paired with a better technical setup.

Stable
V9
Expectation
Analyst coverage expands and at least 2 new price target upgrades are published within 6 months, pushing the consensus target above $265.

CounterAnalyst clusters can be triggered by routine roadshow participation or sector notes rather than proprietary research, and the signal may not reflect material new information about QUALCOMM's competitive positioning.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E6.8
P/S7.6
EV/EBITDA2.9
Fwd P/E7.6
PEG8.8
Analyst target6.0
  • Forward P/E: 16.2x
  • PEG: 0.70

Quality

7.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE10.0
ROA7.7
Gross margin6.8
Op margin7.4
Net margin10.0
Current ratio7.0
FCF quality7.5
Moat6.5
Piotroski F7.8
  • Excellent ROE: 34%
  • Strong margins: 21%
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
  • High-quality business

Growth

0.8/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth1.5
EPS growth0.0
  • Declining revenue: -4%

Momentum

5.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.5
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position5.2
Volume0.0
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+0.4%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness

Sentiment

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment4.3
Analyst rating5.0
Price target7.4

Insider

4.1/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change4.3
notable moves3.0
  • Negligible insider selling — $1,583,205 (0.001% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.6/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank8.0
quality rank7.5
growth rank0.4
  • Attractive P/E vs peers
  • Superior ROE vs peers

Technical

3.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger4.1
support resistance3.6
52w position2.8

Risk (lower is worse)

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.2
days to cover8.4
volatility1.7
put call0.7
implied vol4.7
beta4.5
debt equity7.7
news risk6.0
  • Elevated put/call: 1.90
  • Concentration risks: 3 MED (10-K Item 1A)

Catalyst

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg3.8
dividend safety7.5
news activity8.0
  • Strong earnings: 3B/1M
  • Dividend aristocrat: 2.2% yield

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:5.9>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:75d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:0.6<1.5@spot
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
0.58
Upside
+8.1%
Downside
13.8%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRange Bound RSI 47 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band

EdgeNo clear edge No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive Beta 1.66>1.3

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.1 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Quality at 7.9) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:0.6<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.58 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Quality at 7.9, Value at 6.8, and Catalyst at 6.0; the weakest are Growth at 0.8, Technical at 3.5, and Insider at 4.1. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.58 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1High Quality Business Fundamentals

    Trip ifReturn on equity falls below 25% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Perfect Earnings Beat Streak

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -5% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.

  • P3Above Target Negative AsymmetryTripped

    Trip ifPrice falls below $190 without a corresponding upward revision in analyst targets above $240.

  • P4Analyst Cluster Catalyst

    Trip ifAnalyst coverage drops below 2 active recommendations or consensus target falls below $200.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks QCOM Why this verdict