Value
7.8/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.3 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 28.6x
- ▸PEG: 0.06
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Revenue has declined 25% year over year and the company generates near-zero gross margins with no competitive moat, resulting in a business quality score of 1.8/10 that is among the weakest in the oilfield services sector. Quality breakdown | Revenue stabilizes to less than -10% decline year over year within 2 quarters as drilling activity recovers. | →Stable |
| CounterThe PEG ratio is 0.07, suggesting that on a very long-duration view the market is pricing in substantial earnings recovery; if oil demand recovers, the business could generate outsized returns from a depressed base. | ||
The put/call ratio of 450.50 is an extraordinary outlier reading, indicating that options open interest is almost entirely skewed toward puts, suggesting either massive institutional hedging of existing positions or aggressive directional bets on further price decline. Options | Put/call ratio falls below 10.0 within 6 months as the fundamental situation clarifies. | →Stable |
| CounterAn extreme put/call ratio can precede a sharp reversal if it reflects maximum pessimism at a cyclical trough, where bearish positioning itself becomes the fuel for a short squeeze. | ||
Despite the revenue decline, the company beat earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, including beats where actual losses were materially smaller than expected (e.g., -$0.01 vs. -$0.09 estimate), showing cost management in a difficult environment. Earnings | Earnings beats continue in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters as cost cutting offsets revenue headwinds. | →Stable |
| CounterBeating negative earnings estimates by reducing losses is a lower quality signal than beating on actual profit growth; the company remains unprofitable and cost cuts have limits. | ||
Short interest at 14% of float combined with implied volatility of 97% creates a high-volatility environment where any earnings miss or negative industry news could trigger accelerated price decline. Risk breakdown | Short interest falls below 8% within 12 months as the business fundamentals improve. | →Stable |
| Counter14% short interest with declining revenue and near-zero margins may represent correctly positioned shorts rather than speculative bets, making a squeeze scenario less likely. | ||
CounterThe PEG ratio is 0.07, suggesting that on a very long-duration view the market is pricing in substantial earnings recovery; if oil demand recovers, the business could generate outsized returns from a depressed base.
CounterAn extreme put/call ratio can precede a sharp reversal if it reflects maximum pessimism at a cyclical trough, where bearish positioning itself becomes the fuel for a short squeeze.
CounterBeating negative earnings estimates by reducing losses is a lower quality signal than beating on actual profit growth; the company remains unprofitable and cost cuts have limits.
Counter14% short interest with declining revenue and near-zero margins may represent correctly positioned shorts rather than speculative bets, making a squeeze scenario less likely.
ProPetro Holding operates with near-zero gross margins, -25% declining revenue, and a business quality score of 1.8/10, placing it well below the investable quality threshold, while an extreme put/call ratio of 450.50 signals severe options market concern about near-term downside.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.3 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.5 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.9 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.0 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 8.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 8.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.0 |
| Price target | 9.6 |
| erm sentiment | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.8 |
| quality rank | 1.3 |
| growth rank | 0.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 10.0 |
| support resistance | 9.3 |
| 52w position | 3.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 1.8 |
| days to cover | 7.6 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 6.7 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 8.6 |
| debt equity | 9.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 7.5 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 2.3 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupOversold Bounce — Oversold RSI 23, near Bollinger lower, volume surge
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 23d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.5B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 7.8 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:4.3<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.8, Sentiment at 7.8, and Technical at 7.5; the weakest are Growth at 0.0, Quality at 1.8, and Peer rank at 1.9. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.64 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRevenue declines by more than 30% year over year in any single quarter.
Trip ifPut/call ratio remains above 100 for more than 60 consecutive days.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -50% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 20% of float for more than 45 consecutive days.