Value
6.8/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 2.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 36.7x
- ▸PEG: 0.19
PTRN · Why this verdict
Why Pattern Group Inc. - Series A (PTRN) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score6.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Amazon accounts for 93% of total revenue, meaning the entire growth and cash flow thesis depends on a single customer relationship that could be renegotiated, reduced, or terminated by a counterparty with far greater bargaining power. Bear case | Amazon's share of revenue falls below 85% within 24 months as the company diversifies to new customers. | →Stable |
| CounterA 93% revenue share from Amazon may reflect a deeply integrated operational relationship, effectively functioning as a captive vendor with predictable and growing contract value. | ||
Revenue is growing at 43% year over year, placing the company as an industry growth leader at the 9.3/10 rank in its peer group, supported by free cash flow conversion of 397% relative to net income and a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth sustains above 20% year over year in each of the next 2 annual reporting periods. | →Stable |
| CounterRevenue growth driven primarily by a single large customer is not the same as organic market share gains; if Amazon reduces volume, the headline growth rate could reverse sharply. | ||
The debt-to-equity ratio of 5.1 times triggers a leverage penalty that reduces the quality score, and combined with the customer concentration, creates a scenario where a customer volume reduction could impair debt service coverage. Risk breakdown | Debt-to-equity ratio falls below 3.0 within 18 months through earnings retention or debt repayment. | →Stable |
| CounterFree cash flow conversion of 397% relative to net income provides substantial capacity to service and reduce debt faster than the headline leverage ratio suggests. | ||
A recent extreme gap down of -10.1% occurred on a 2.2x average volume surge, historically a pattern associated with capitulation selling where the most motivated sellers exit at once, potentially creating a technical floor. Technical breakdown | Price recovers above $20.97 resistance within 6 months as selling pressure subsides following the gap down. | →Stable |
| CounterA gap down on high volume in a company with 93% customer concentration and high leverage may reflect informed sellers acting on fundamental knowledge, not indiscriminate panic. | ||
Amazon accounts for 93% of total revenue, meaning the entire growth and cash flow thesis depends on a single customer relationship that could be renegotiated, reduced, or terminated by a counterparty with far greater bargaining power.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Amazon's share of revenue falls below 85% within 24 months as the company diversifies to new customers.
CounterA 93% revenue share from Amazon may reflect a deeply integrated operational relationship, effectively functioning as a captive vendor with predictable and growing contract value.
Revenue is growing at 43% year over year, placing the company as an industry growth leader at the 9.3/10 rank in its peer group, supported by free cash flow conversion of 397% relative to net income and a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth sustains above 20% year over year in each of the next 2 annual reporting periods.
CounterRevenue growth driven primarily by a single large customer is not the same as organic market share gains; if Amazon reduces volume, the headline growth rate could reverse sharply.
The debt-to-equity ratio of 5.1 times triggers a leverage penalty that reduces the quality score, and combined with the customer concentration, creates a scenario where a customer volume reduction could impair debt service coverage.
→StableRisk breakdown
- Expectation
- Debt-to-equity ratio falls below 3.0 within 18 months through earnings retention or debt repayment.
CounterFree cash flow conversion of 397% relative to net income provides substantial capacity to service and reduce debt faster than the headline leverage ratio suggests.
A recent extreme gap down of -10.1% occurred on a 2.2x average volume surge, historically a pattern associated with capitulation selling where the most motivated sellers exit at once, potentially creating a technical floor.
→StableTechnical breakdown
- Expectation
- Price recovers above $20.97 resistance within 6 months as selling pressure subsides following the gap down.
CounterA gap down on high volume in a company with 93% customer concentration and high leverage may reflect informed sellers acting on fundamental knowledge, not indiscriminate panic.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Pattern Group Inc. delivers 43% year-over-year revenue growth and a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 with free cash flow conversion of 397%, but 93% customer concentration in a single customer and a leverage ratio of 5.1 times debt-to-equity create existential concentration risk that outweighs the growth story.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
4.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.5 |
| ROA | 1.8 |
| Gross margin | 4.7 |
| Op margin | 2.0 |
| Net margin | 0.4 |
| Current ratio | 8.4 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 5.6 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 397% FCF/NI
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
10.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong growth: 43% YoY
Momentum
6.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 2.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.5 |
| Volume | 4.3 |
- ▸Overbought bear rally (RSI 77)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
Sentiment
5.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.9 |
| Price target | 3.1 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (8.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Below analyst target
Insider
3.1/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 2.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.2 |
- ▸Heavy insider selling — $167,097,408 (3.186% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.9/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.7 |
| quality rank | 3.4 |
| growth rank | 9.3 |
- ▸Industry growth leader
Technical
3.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.3 |
| 52w position | 9.8 |
Risk (lower is worse)
3.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.0 |
| days to cover | 9.7 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 1.7 |
| implied vol | 0.1 |
| debt equity | 0.0 |
- ▸Elevated put/call: 1.75
- ▸High IV: 79%
- ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (5)
- MOMENTUM:6.9>=5.5
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:33d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- ASYMMETRY:-1.6=NEGATIVE
- INSIDER:3.19%=EXTREME
Warning (1)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-1.65
Upside
-24.7%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.5 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Growth at 10.0) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.6=NEGATIVE, INSIDER:3.19%=EXTREME) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.65 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Momentum at 6.9, and Value at 6.8; the weakest are Insider at 3.1, Risk (lower is worse) at 3.2, and Technical at 3.4. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.65 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Amazon Concentration Existential Risk
Trip ifAmazon's share of revenue rises above 95% or declines below 80% in any annual filing.
- P2Revenue Growth Strength
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 15% year over year for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3High Leverage Risk
Trip ifDebt-to-equity ratio rises above 6.0 in any quarterly report.
- P4Selloff Volume Reversal Signal
Trip ifPrice falls below $18.00 and volume exceeds 2 times the 30-day average for more than 5 consecutive days.