Value
7.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.7 |
| P/S | 9.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.2 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 10.9x
- ▸PEG: 0.01
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Principal Financial trades at a forward P/E of 10.8x and a PEG ratio of 0.01, making it attractively priced on most earnings-based valuation metrics for an asset management company. Valuation breakdown | The forward P/E expands above 13x within 12 months as earnings stabilize and the valuation discount to peers narrows. | →Stable |
| CounterLow multiples in asset management firms can be persistent due to structural headwinds from fee compression, passive fund competition, and earnings cyclicality tied to market levels. | ||
Principal Financial achieves a strong Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, indicating broad-based improvement across nearly all standard financial health metrics including profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency. Quality breakdown | Piotroski F-Score remains at 7 or above in the next annual financial report. | →Stable |
| CounterA high Piotroski score in a financial services firm can reflect backward-looking improvement; if AUM declines in a market downturn, earnings and balance sheet metrics can deteriorate rapidly. | ||
Revenue is declining 4% year-over-year and the company has missed EPS estimates in 2 of the last 4 quarters, with the two most recent consecutive misses in Q3 and Q4 2025 signaling emerging execution risk. Earnings | Revenue growth returns to positive territory above 3% and the company returns to EPS beats in at least 2 of the next 3 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterTwo misses following two beats suggests earnings volatility rather than a structural downtrend; the company may be in a normal earnings cyclicality pattern for an asset manager rather than fundamental deterioration. | ||
The stock at $110.59 is already above the analyst resistance target of $109.82, offering -0.7% upside and a risk/reward ratio of -0.19, meaning there is no reward for taking on downside risk at current prices. Warnings | Analyst targets are revised upward above $125 within 12 months as earnings stabilize and AUM growth resumes. | →Stable |
| CounterAsset manager stocks trade on market sentiment as much as fundamentals; a sustained equity market rally could push analyst targets higher rapidly even without material business improvement. | ||
CounterLow multiples in asset management firms can be persistent due to structural headwinds from fee compression, passive fund competition, and earnings cyclicality tied to market levels.
CounterA high Piotroski score in a financial services firm can reflect backward-looking improvement; if AUM declines in a market downturn, earnings and balance sheet metrics can deteriorate rapidly.
CounterTwo misses following two beats suggests earnings volatility rather than a structural downtrend; the company may be in a normal earnings cyclicality pattern for an asset manager rather than fundamental deterioration.
CounterAsset manager stocks trade on market sentiment as much as fundamentals; a sustained equity market rally could push analyst targets higher rapidly even without material business improvement.
Principal Financial Group trades at an attractive forward P/E of 10.8x with a strong Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and positive price momentum, but revenue is declining 4% year-over-year, two recent earnings misses have emerged, and the stock is priced above analyst targets with negative upside.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.7 |
| P/S | 9.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.2 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 4.5 |
| ROA | 0.2 |
| Gross margin | 5.5 |
| Op margin | 5.9 |
| Net margin | 5.1 |
| Current ratio | 5.6 |
| FCF quality | 6.7 |
| Moat | 5.1 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 2.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 3.9 |
| erm sentiment | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.4 |
| quality rank | 4.2 |
| growth rank | 2.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.7 |
| support resistance | 1.5 |
| 52w position | 9.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.5 |
| days to cover | 1.8 |
| volatility | 6.6 |
| put call | 6.7 |
| implied vol | 8.3 |
| beta | 7.7 |
| debt equity | 8.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 6.5 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 3.3 |
| dividend safety | 4.8 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.7 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 7.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-2.5=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -2.45 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.4, Risk (lower is worse) at 6.8, and Quality at 5.3; the weakest are Growth at 1.4, Peer rank at 3.4, and Sentiment at 4.5. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -2.45 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifForward P/E contracts below 9x as earnings estimates are revised downward by more than 15%.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6 in the next annual financial report, indicating deterioration across 3 or more health metrics.
Trip ifRevenue declines by more than 8% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters, accelerating beyond the current 4% decline rate.
Trip ifStock price falls below $100, declining more than 9% below current levels and breaking the 52-week uptrend structure.