Value
4.7/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 8.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.1 |
| p ocf | 9.1 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸P/OCF: 7.3x (FFO proxy — REITs gated off P/E)
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The REIT trades at a P/OCF (FFO proxy) of 7.3x with a high FCF yield of 20.4%, indicating a statistically cheap valuation for an office property portfolio. Valuation breakdown | P/OCF should remain below 9x while FCF yield stays above 15% over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA cheap FFO multiple in office REITs frequently reflects structural demand deterioration (remote work, rising vacancies) rather than a temporary mispricing. | ||
The company has missed consensus estimates in all 4 of its last reported quarters, with a deeply negative average surprise near -293%. Earnings | The company should return to meeting or beating consensus in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterA 4-for-4 miss streak this severe, especially in office real estate, often reflects structurally declining occupancy or rental rates rather than a one-off issue that a single good quarter would reverse. | ||
Quality sits at 3.7, just below the engine's 4.0 floor, with no competitive moat despite the REIT remaining FCF-positive with moderate margins. Quality breakdown | Quality score should rise above 4.0 over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe gap to the quality floor is narrow (3.7 vs 4.0), but persistent earnings misses suggest the underlying trend is toward a wider gap, not a quick recovery. | ||
The stock has formed a golden cross, trading above all major moving averages with bullish MACD, even though on-balance volume is falling. Momentum breakdown | Price should hold above key moving averages and OBV should stabilize or turn up over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA golden cross accompanied by falling volume is a weaker technical signal and can fail quickly, especially against a backdrop of consistent earnings misses. | ||
The stock has already reached its prior price target, with the model flagging -11.6% modeled upside and a negative asymmetry ratio. Warnings | A new, higher price target should be established to justify further appreciation over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA negative asymmetry ratio combined with a persistent earnings miss streak more often precedes further downside than a re-rating higher. | ||
CounterA cheap FFO multiple in office REITs frequently reflects structural demand deterioration (remote work, rising vacancies) rather than a temporary mispricing.
CounterA 4-for-4 miss streak this severe, especially in office real estate, often reflects structurally declining occupancy or rental rates rather than a one-off issue that a single good quarter would reverse.
CounterThe gap to the quality floor is narrow (3.7 vs 4.0), but persistent earnings misses suggest the underlying trend is toward a wider gap, not a quick recovery.
CounterA golden cross accompanied by falling volume is a weaker technical signal and can fail quickly, especially against a backdrop of consistent earnings misses.
CounterA negative asymmetry ratio combined with a persistent earnings miss streak more often precedes further downside than a re-rating higher.
Piedmont Realty Trust screens cheap on an FFO-proxy basis, but a persistent 4-quarter earnings miss streak, quality just below the engine's floor, and a negative asymmetry ratio suggest the office REIT's discount reflects structural, not temporary, weakness.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 8.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.1 |
| p ocf | 9.1 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.8 |
| Gross margin | 8.0 |
| Op margin | 5.2 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 2.1 |
| FCF quality | 6.0 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 7.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 1.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.1 |
| Price target | 5.6 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.5 |
| quality rank | 1.8 |
| growth rank | 3.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.3 |
| support resistance | 1.4 |
| 52w position | 9.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.0 |
| days to cover | 7.2 |
| volatility | 4.7 |
| beta | 5.6 |
| debt equity | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 60, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.35>1.3, MCap $1.2B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Momentum at 6.5 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-1.1=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 6.5, Risk (lower is worse) at 5.9, and Sentiment at 5.7; the weakest are Growth at 2.6, Catalyst at 3.0, and Quality at 3.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.15 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifP/OCF rises above 10x without a corresponding increase in FFO.
Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 more consecutive quarters.
Trip ifQuality score falls below 3.0.
Trip ifPrice closes below the 50-day moving average for more than 5 consecutive trading days.
Trip ifUpside to price target falls below -20%.