Tommy Bahama brand
“10-K Item 1: 'Tommy Bahama, which represents 56% of our net sales, designs, sources, markets and distributes men's and women's sportswear'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Oxford Industries discloses is Tommy Bahama brand at 56%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Oxford Industries’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'Tommy Bahama, which represents 56% of our net sales, designs, sources, markets and distributes men's and women's sportswear'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'our largest customer only represented 5% of our consolidated net sales in Fiscal 2025'”
Oxford Industries' concentration is centered on its product portfolio rather than its customer base. The Tommy Bahama brand represents 56% of net sales, a high-share structural concentration that makes it the dominant driver of the company's overall business by design, given Oxford operates as a multi-brand apparel company. By contrast, the company's largest customer represented only 5% of consolidated net sales in Fiscal 2025, a low-share dependency exposure. These two exposures point in different directions: the brand concentration is a structural feature of the business's portfolio composition, where results are disproportionately tied to Tommy Bahama's performance rather than to an event at any single retail partner or wholesale account. The customer concentration, by contrast, is minimal, reflecting a broadly diversified distribution and retail base in which no single account can meaningfully move results on its own. Together, the picture is one where brand-level performance — not customer relationships — is the dominant lever on the business, and Tommy Bahama's trajectory should be watched more closely than any individual account relationship.
For the engine’s reasoning on OXM’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLM | Columbia Sportswear Company | 2 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| GIII | G-III Apparel Group, LTD. | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| KTB | Kontoor Brands, Inc. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| LEVI | Levi Strauss & Co | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| OXM● | Oxford Industries, Inc. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| FIGS | FIGS, Inc. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.