Value
9.6/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 10.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 1.7x
- ▸PEG: 0.01
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Oxford Lane Capital trades at a strikingly cheap forward valuation, but a negative news-driven downgrade, a confirmed technical downtrend, declining revenue, and consecutive earnings misses all point to near-term weakness.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Revenue is declining 10% year-over-year, and the Rule of 40 score fails outright at -4, reflecting a shrinking, sub-scale business by that combined metric. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth turns positive, exceeding 0% YoY. | Tripped→Stable |
| CounterFor a closed-end investment fund like Oxford Lane, investment income naturally fluctuates with the credit cycle and NAV, making a Rule of 40 framework less applicable than for an operating company. | ||
A negative news event downgraded the actionable recommendation from a hold-if-holding stance to a sell-if-holding stance, and a technical death-cross pattern hard-blocked new buying. Warnings | The news modifier reverts to neutral or positive as the underlying news event resolves. | →Stable |
| CounterNews-driven modifiers can be short-lived reactions to a single headline that don't reflect a lasting change in the underlying portfolio. | ||
Oxford Lane Capital trades at a strikingly low forward P/E of 1.7x and a near-zero PEG ratio of 0.01, both flagged as attractively valued. Valuation breakdown | Forward P/E stays below 5x while the underlying portfolio income holds steady. | →Stable |
| CounterA forward P/E this low at a closed-end CLO fund often reflects the market pricing in NAV erosion or distribution cuts rather than a genuine bargain. | ||
The stock remains in a confirmed downtrend, trading below its 200-day moving average with the MA sloping down -5.4% over the past 30 days. Momentum breakdown | The stock reclaims its 200-day moving average with the MA slope turning positive. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterRising on-balance volume even during the downtrend could indicate accumulation ahead of a bottom, despite the negative moving-average trend. | ||
The company has posted consecutive earnings misses over the last 2 reported periods, reinforcing the bearish news-driven downgrade. Bear case | The company returns to meeting or beating earnings estimates for at least 1 consecutive quarter. | →Stable |
| CounterFor a CLO-focused fund, quarter-to-quarter EPS can swing on mark-to-market valuation changes rather than reflecting a deterioration in the underlying credit portfolio. | ||
CounterFor a closed-end investment fund like Oxford Lane, investment income naturally fluctuates with the credit cycle and NAV, making a Rule of 40 framework less applicable than for an operating company.
CounterNews-driven modifiers can be short-lived reactions to a single headline that don't reflect a lasting change in the underlying portfolio.
CounterA forward P/E this low at a closed-end CLO fund often reflects the market pricing in NAV erosion or distribution cuts rather than a genuine bargain.
CounterRising on-balance volume even during the downtrend could indicate accumulation ahead of a bottom, despite the negative moving-average trend.
CounterFor a CLO-focused fund, quarter-to-quarter EPS can swing on mark-to-market valuation changes rather than reflecting a deterioration in the underlying credit portfolio.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 10.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 6.0 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 8.6 |
| FCF quality | 4.7 |
| Moat | 4.8 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.0 |
| MACD | 7.3 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.6 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 9.3 |
| quality rank | 0.1 |
| growth rank | 1.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.8 |
| support resistance | 1.9 |
| 52w position | 2.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.7 |
| days to cover | 7.0 |
| volatility | 6.9 |
| beta | 9.2 |
| debt equity | 6.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 1.1 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.0 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 70
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.9B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.9B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.5 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 9.6) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:3.1<4.5, DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 2.64 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.6, Risk (lower is worse) at 7.5, and Sentiment at 6.5; the weakest are Technical at 2.3, Catalyst at 2.5, and Momentum at 3.1. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.64 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifThe news modifier downgrades the verdict a second consecutive time, or the death-cross block remains active for more than 2 consecutive review cycles.
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 4x from the current 1.7x.
Trip ifThe stock closes more than 15% below its 200-day moving average, deepening the current -5.4%/30d MA slope.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below -20% YoY from the current -10% pace.
Trip ifThe company's earnings surprise stays below 0% for a 3rd consecutive quarter.