Value
8.4/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.8 |
| P/S | 7.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 7.8x
- ▸PEG: 0.20
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
With 80% of the portfolio in technology-related companies, any sector-wide credit stress or rising defaults in technology lending would disproportionately impact portfolio performance. Bear case | Portfolio concentration in technology remains below 85% over the next 12 months and net asset value per share holds above $10. | →Stable |
| CounterTechnology-focused lending has historically produced strong risk-adjusted returns during tightening cycles, and borrower selectivity may offset concentration risk. | ||
Blue Owl Technology Finance beat consensus estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters with an average surprise of 27.9%, the most recent beat coming in at 17.6% above estimates. Earnings | The company maintains its earnings beat streak for at least 2 more consecutive quarters, with average surprise remaining above 10%. | →Stable |
| CounterThe high average surprise may reflect consistently low analyst estimates rather than genuine outperformance; mean reversion in estimate accuracy would close the gap. | ||
A Rule of 40 score of 113 places the business in elite territory for the combination of growth and profitability, supported by 78% year-over-year revenue growth. Quality breakdown | Revenue growth remains above 30% year-over-year and the Rule of 40 score stays above 60 over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterGrowth at this pace is unsustainable indefinitely; any deceleration toward market growth rates would compress the Rule of 40 score sharply and likely reprice the stock. | ||
The stock is below its 200-day moving average with the average sloping down 3.1% over 30 days, confirmed by a volume surge of 2.4 times average on a selloff — a technical distribution pattern. Momentum breakdown | Price rises above the 200-day moving average and on-balance volume turns positive within 9 months. | →Stable |
| CounterDistribution volume during a downtrend often precedes further selling by institutional holders reducing exposure before the underlying fundamentals deteriorate. | ||
CounterTechnology-focused lending has historically produced strong risk-adjusted returns during tightening cycles, and borrower selectivity may offset concentration risk.
CounterThe high average surprise may reflect consistently low analyst estimates rather than genuine outperformance; mean reversion in estimate accuracy would close the gap.
CounterGrowth at this pace is unsustainable indefinitely; any deceleration toward market growth rates would compress the Rule of 40 score sharply and likely reprice the stock.
CounterDistribution volume during a downtrend often precedes further selling by institutional holders reducing exposure before the underlying fundamentals deteriorate.
Blue Owl Technology Finance posted four consecutive quarterly earnings beats averaging 27.9% above estimates and a Rule of 40 score of 113, but heavy concentration in technology-related loans (80% of portfolio) and a confirmed price downtrend create meaningful asymmetry risk.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.8 |
| P/S | 7.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.8 |
| ROA | 2.9 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 1.2 |
| FCF quality | 7.3 |
| Moat | 6.4 |
| Rule of 40 | 9.5 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 9.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 6.6 |
| OBV | 1.8 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 1.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.9 |
| Price target | 8.6 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.5 |
| quality rank | 4.6 |
| growth rank | 9.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.1 |
| support resistance | 5.1 |
| 52w position | 1.2 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.3 |
| days to cover | 8.1 |
| volatility | 3.8 |
| debt equity | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.2 |
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
L4:PATH_F_HOLDnone
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 47
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -44% (>40% off 52w high)
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: ASYMMETRY:1.8>=1.5. Top dim: Growth at 9.9; weakest: Momentum at 3.2. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 9.9, Value at 8.4, and Sentiment at 6.9; the weakest are Momentum at 3.2, Technical at 4.1, and Insider at 5.1. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.84 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEarnings per share falls below consensus estimate in 2 or more of the next 4 quarters.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 20% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifTechnology-sector loan concentration rises above 90% of the portfolio.
Trip ifPrice drops below $9.50 and on-balance volume declines for 8 or more consecutive weeks.