top two margin-loan customer accounts
“10-K Item 1A: 'our two largest customer accounts collectively comprise approximately 47.8% of the margin loans as of December 31, 2025'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Oppenheimer Holdings discloses is top two margin-loan customer accounts at 47.8%, classified MEDIUM by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Oppenheimer Holdings’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1A: 'our two largest customer accounts collectively comprise approximately 47.8% of the margin loans as of December 31, 2025'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'A substantial majority of our cash is held with a large, global systemically important bank, often in balances that exceed the current FDIC insurance limits.'”
Oppenheimer's concentration profile centers on two related but distinct exposures: on the asset side, its two largest customer accounts collectively comprise approximately 47.8% of margin loans, a medium-sized share concentrated among a handful of borrowers; on the cash side, a substantial majority of company cash is held with a single global systemically important bank, often in balances exceeding FDIC insurance limits. Both exposures share a dependency character rather than being structural features of the business model — they reflect counterparty relationships rather than diversified, distributed risk. The margin-loan concentration means an adverse credit event at either of the two largest accounts could disproportionately affect loan portfolio performance, while the cash-concentration exposure means a problem at that single banking counterparty could affect uninsured balances. Together these point to counterparty risk as the throughline for Oppenheimer's disclosed concentrations — less about secular market exposure and more about how much rides on a small number of specific relationships, both on the lending side and in treasury management of the firm's own cash.
For the engine’s reasoning on OPY’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABTC | American Bitcoin Corp. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| BTBT | Bit Digital, Inc. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| BMNR | BitMine Immersion Technologies, | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| OPY● | Oppenheimer Holdings, Inc. | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| BTGO | BitGo Holdings, Inc. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| BGC | BGC Group, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.