Value
7.9/10data confidence 40%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1 |
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Office Properties Income Trust screens as statistically cheap with rising price accumulation above its 200-day average, but a collapsed operating margin, no economic moat, and declining revenue keep the quality picture below the investable floor.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Office Properties Income Trust's operating margin has collapsed to -414.1%, flagged by the engine as a value-trap red flag despite the stock's cheap headline multiples. Warnings | Operating margin should recover materially over the next 12 months if the REIT's core lease income stabilizes. | →Stable |
| CounterThe quality dimension's own notes describe free cash flow as positive (FCF margin 16%, FCF yield 16.9%), directly contradicting the warnings' 'negative free cash flow' value-trap signal — a data inconsistency that undercuts confidence in either read. | ||
Office Properties Income Trust has no competitive moat and a quality score of 3.9, just below the engine's 4.0 investability floor. Quality breakdown | A resolving quality picture would show the quality score rising above 4.0 over the next 12 months. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterOffice REITs are commodity-like by nature, so the absence of a 'moat' is structural to the sub-sector rather than company-specific weakness. | ||
Office Properties Income Trust's revenue is declining at -4% per the growth dimension's notes. Growth breakdown | A stabilizing portfolio would show revenue growth turning positive over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterRevenue decline in an office REIT undergoing planned asset sales can reflect a deliberate deleveraging strategy rather than operational deterioration. | ||
Office Properties Income Trust shows rising volume accumulation and trades above its 200-day moving average, per the momentum notes. Momentum breakdown | Continued strength would keep the price holding above the 200-day moving average over the next 12 months. | ↑Improving |
| CounterPrice accumulation above a moving average can occur even in fundamentally weak names during a broader sector short-covering rally. | ||
The engine's risk-adjusted upside to price target stands at 22.1% (per v9 upside_pct), even after applying an analyst haircut to the raw 44% sentiment-model upside figure. Estimated upside | A closing of this gap would show the price appreciating toward the target over the next 12 months. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterThe gap between the raw 44% analyst-model upside and the risk-adjusted 22.1% v9 figure shows how much haircut the engine applies to office-REIT price targets given sector risk. | ||
CounterThe quality dimension's own notes describe free cash flow as positive (FCF margin 16%, FCF yield 16.9%), directly contradicting the warnings' 'negative free cash flow' value-trap signal — a data inconsistency that undercuts confidence in either read.
CounterOffice REITs are commodity-like by nature, so the absence of a 'moat' is structural to the sub-sector rather than company-specific weakness.
CounterRevenue decline in an office REIT undergoing planned asset sales can reflect a deliberate deleveraging strategy rather than operational deterioration.
CounterPrice accumulation above a moving average can occur even in fundamentally weak names during a broader sector short-covering rally.
CounterThe gap between the raw 44% analyst-model upside and the risk-adjusted 22.1% v9 figure shows how much haircut the engine applies to office-REIT price targets given sector risk.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.4 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.8 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 7.7 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.9 |
| Price target | 9.5 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 2.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 9.4 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 2.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 8.3 |
| support resistance | 7.0 |
| 52w position | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| debt equity | 1.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
Market cap $395M below $400M minimum. Not in investable universe.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:MARKET_CAPSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.4B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.4B<$5B
The HOLD_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the INSIDER gate's 1.65%=EXTREME outcome against Catalyst at 8.3 and asymmetric R:R of 2.08.
The strongest dimensions are Catalyst at 8.3, Value at 7.9, and Sentiment at 6.8; the weakest are Growth at 3.0, Peer rank at 3.1, and Quality at 3.8. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.08 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifOperating margin improves above -100% (from current -414.1%).
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 (from current 3.9), clearing the investability floor.
Trip ifRevenue growth turns positive, exceeding 2% YoY (from current -4%).
Trip ifPrice closes below the 200-day moving average for 5 consecutive sessions, reversing the current accumulation.
Trip ifRisk-adjusted upside to price target compresses below 5% (from current 22.1%) without the price approaching the target.