Skip to main content
NOCNorthrop Grumman CorporationSell4.9·$550.66
NOC · Why this verdict

Why Northrop Grumman (NOC) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.9/10
ConfidenceHIGH
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Northrop Grumman has delivered four consecutive earnings beats and a 29% return on equity with strong peer-relative valuation, but a confirmed death-cross technical pattern, high US government customer concentration of 84%, and below-average free cash flow quality present meaningful risks for new buyers.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Northrop has beaten earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters, with the most recent two beats exceeding 18%, indicating the company is consistently delivering above analyst expectations on program execution and cost management.

↓Deteriorating
Earnings
Expectation
Earnings beats continue in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters with positive surprises above 5%.

CounterDefense contractor earnings beats often reflect program timing and milestone billing rather than true operational acceleration, and the high PEG of 4.06 suggests limited growth to justify the beat pattern.

Approximately 84% of Northrop Grumman's revenue comes from the US government, making the company's financial performance highly dependent on federal defense budget decisions, continuing resolutions, and potential sequestration events.

↑Improving
Bear case
Expectation
Non-US-government revenue grows to represent at least 20% of total revenue within 24 months through international defense contract wins.

CounterUS government concentration provides extraordinary revenue visibility and stability since defense contracts are multi-year, and the current geopolitical environment supports sustained or growing defense spending.

A confirmed death-cross is blocking a buy signal with a hard gate failure, and the stock's momentum score of 4.1 is below the minimum threshold of 4.5, with on-balance volume declining, indicating institutional distribution rather than accumulation.

→Stable
Engine gate (failed)
Expectation
The death cross resolves into a golden cross within 5 months as the price recovers above the 200-day moving average.

CounterMACD is improving and RSI at 46 is not yet oversold, suggesting the death cross may be in the early stages of resolution, particularly if defense spending news acts as a catalyst.

Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 29% is rated as excellent and places it among the top-performing peers in the aerospace and defense sector, reflecting efficient capital deployment on its defense programs.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Return on equity remains above 25% over the next 12 months as program profitability sustains current capital efficiency.

CounterHigh ROE in defense contractors is often supported by negative tangible book equity from pension obligations and buybacks rather than genuine business quality improvement.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E7.2
P/S9.1
EV/EBITDA4.3
Fwd P/E6.8
PEG3.0
Analyst target5.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 18.5x
  • ▸PEG: 4.18

Quality

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE8.7
ROA4.7
Gross margin0.0
Op margin5.2
Net margin5.2
Current ratio4.7
FCF quality5.3
Moat5.4
Piotroski F6.7
  • ▸Excellent ROE: 26%
  • ▸Earnings quality warning: 70% FCF/NI
  • ▸No competitive moat

Growth

3.4/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth4.2
EPS growth2.6

Momentum

4.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI2.9
MACD10.0
OBV1.0
MA position6.0
Volume0.0
  • ▸Overbought bear rally (RSI 72)
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -1.6%/30d — confirmed downtrend

Sentiment

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment5.5
Analyst rating7.5
Price target7.2

Insider

3.8/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change3.3
notable moves3.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

5.0/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank8.6
quality rank8.1
growth rank1.3
  • ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
  • ▸Superior ROE vs peers

Technical

3.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger3.1
support resistance2.4
52w position4.4

Risk (lower is worse)

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest9.2
days to cover8.5
volatility5.5
put call9.9
implied vol6.5
max pain risk3.0
debt equity5.4
  • ▸Above max pain $430
  • ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg6.0
dividend safety8.5
news activity6.0
  • ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • ▸Dividend aristocrat: 1.8% yield

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (6)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:84d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
  • MOMENTUM:4.0<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:0.3<1.5@spot
  • DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
0.27
Upside
+3.9%
Downside
14.4%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 72

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.7 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 6.9) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:4.0<4.5, ASYMMETRY:0.3<1.5@spot, DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.27 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 6.9, Sentiment at 6.8, and Catalyst at 6.8; the weakest are Technical at 3.3, Growth at 3.4, and Insider at 3.8. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.27 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Government Customer Concentration

    Trip ifDefense budget appropriations fall below prior-year levels, causing management to lower full-year revenue guidance by more than 5%.

  • P2Consecutive Earnings Beat Streak

    Trip ifEarnings surprise falls below 0% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.

  • P3Death Cross Momentum Blockage

    Trip ifPrice drops below $500 while still in a confirmed death-cross pattern.

  • P4Excellent Roe Peer Ranking

    Trip ifReturn on equity falls below 20% for 2 consecutive quarters.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › NOC › Why this verdict