Value
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.8 |
| P/S | 8.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.7 |
| PEG | 6.8 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 15.9x
- ▸PEG: 1.04
MWA · Why this verdict
Why MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS (MWA) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.5/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Mueller Water Products beat earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of 7.6%, and has not missed once in the trailing year, reflecting steady operational execution in water infrastructure. Earnings | The company continues to beat or meet consensus in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters as water infrastructure demand remains supported. | →Stable |
| CounterAn average surprise of only 7.6% and no standout beats suggest guidance is set conservatively; any unexpected cost pressure in materials or labor could flip the pattern to misses. | ||
A Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and quality peer rankings above median indicate that Mueller Water Products maintains solid balance sheet health and financial discipline, even if free cash flow relative to net income falls short at 48%. Quality breakdown | The Piotroski F-Score stays at 7 or above through the next annual reporting cycle as liquidity and profitability metrics hold. | →Stable |
| CounterFree cash flow converting at only 48% of net income is flagged as a quality concern; if working capital deteriorates further, the Piotroski score could drop and quality metrics could compress. | ||
Mueller Water Products ranks above the median in P/E value versus peers, with an attractive forward P/E of 16.3x and a PEG of 1.07, suggesting the stock is not overpaying for growth relative to industrial machinery comparables. Peer-rank breakdown | The stock re-rates closer to the analyst consensus target of approximately $28, implying at least 8% upside from current $25.79 levels within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA PEG of 1.07 is not particularly cheap in the context of a below-average growth profile, and the stock's limited 8.6% upside to target leaves little cushion for valuation compression. | ||
Mueller Water Products relies on single-source or limited-source suppliers for key components, meaning a supply disruption could halt production and create outsized revenue shortfalls relative to the company's size. Bear case | The company diversifies its supplier base so that no single-source dependency accounts for more than 30% of critical materials within 18 months. | →Stable |
| CounterWater infrastructure components often require specialized suppliers, and long-term qualified supplier relationships typically provide more reliability than the concentration label implies. | ||
Mueller Water Products beat earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of 7.6%, and has not missed once in the trailing year, reflecting steady operational execution in water infrastructure.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- The company continues to beat or meet consensus in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters as water infrastructure demand remains supported.
CounterAn average surprise of only 7.6% and no standout beats suggest guidance is set conservatively; any unexpected cost pressure in materials or labor could flip the pattern to misses.
A Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and quality peer rankings above median indicate that Mueller Water Products maintains solid balance sheet health and financial discipline, even if free cash flow relative to net income falls short at 48%.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- The Piotroski F-Score stays at 7 or above through the next annual reporting cycle as liquidity and profitability metrics hold.
CounterFree cash flow converting at only 48% of net income is flagged as a quality concern; if working capital deteriorates further, the Piotroski score could drop and quality metrics could compress.
Mueller Water Products ranks above the median in P/E value versus peers, with an attractive forward P/E of 16.3x and a PEG of 1.07, suggesting the stock is not overpaying for growth relative to industrial machinery comparables.
→StablePeer-rank breakdown
- Expectation
- The stock re-rates closer to the analyst consensus target of approximately $28, implying at least 8% upside from current $25.79 levels within 12 months.
CounterA PEG of 1.07 is not particularly cheap in the context of a below-average growth profile, and the stock's limited 8.6% upside to target leaves little cushion for valuation compression.
Mueller Water Products relies on single-source or limited-source suppliers for key components, meaning a supply disruption could halt production and create outsized revenue shortfalls relative to the company's size.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- The company diversifies its supplier base so that no single-source dependency accounts for more than 30% of critical materials within 18 months.
CounterWater infrastructure components often require specialized suppliers, and long-term qualified supplier relationships typically provide more reliability than the concentration label implies.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Mueller Water Products has a 3-of-4 earnings beat record, a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, and trades at an attractive valuation relative to industrial peers, but momentum has softened below critical thresholds and the upside-to-risk ratio remains too thin for a new position at current prices.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 7.1 |
| ROA | 6.9 |
| Gross margin | 3.5 |
| Op margin | 8.8 |
| Net margin | 7.1 |
| Current ratio | 8.4 |
| FCF quality | 3.8 |
| Moat | 6.9 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: 48% FCF/NI
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
4.5/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.9 |
| EPS growth | 5.1 |
Momentum
2.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 2.9 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.5 |
| Volume | 1.4 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope flat
Sentiment
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 3.0 |
| Analyst rating | 6.6 |
| Price target | 8.1 |
- ▸LLM news sentiment: -0.40 (n=1)
- ▸Light analyst coverage (6.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Analyst upside: 24%
Insider
4.9/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Modest insider selling — $1,340,567 (0.034% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
4.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.1 |
| quality rank | 7.8 |
| growth rank | 3.3 |
- ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
- ▸Superior ROE vs peers
Technical
8.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 9.1 |
| support resistance | 9.2 |
| 52w position | 6.2 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.1 |
| days to cover | 7.3 |
| volatility | 5.4 |
| put call | 8.3 |
| implied vol | 1.2 |
| beta | 6.9 |
| debt equity | 8.3 |
- ▸High IV: 73%
- ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
6.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 6.3 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/0M
- ▸Dividend: 111.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_HOLDPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:30d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
- MOMENTUM:2.3<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:1.4<1.5@spot
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
1.42
Upside
+8.0%
Downside
5.7%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $3.9B<$5B
Investment implication
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: INSIDER:OK. Top dim: Technical at 8.2; weakest: Momentum at 2.3. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Technical at 8.2, Value at 6.8, and Quality at 6.8; the weakest are Momentum at 2.3, Growth at 4.5, and Peer rank at 4.8. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.42 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Consistent Earnings Execution
Trip ifEarnings miss consensus estimates by more than 5% in any 1 of the next 3 quarters.
- P2Strong Quality Piotroski Score
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6 in the next annual reporting cycle.
- P3Attractive Peer Relative Valuation
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target declines below $25 (falls below current price of $25.79).
- P4Single Source Supplier Concentration
Trip ifManagement discloses that a single-source supplier failure caused revenue to decline more than 5% in any quarter.