Value
6.6/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.3 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.7 |
| PEG | 4.7 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 22.4x
- ▸PEG: 1.76
MUFG · Why this verdict
Why Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, (MUFG) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score6.5/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is in a technical breakout with 3 of 4 recent earnings beats and an average upside surprise of 26.5%, but the stock has moved above its resistance target and carries a negative asymmetry ratio, limiting appeal for new positions.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
With the stock at $20.18 already above the $19.98 price target, the asymmetry ratio is -1.93, meaning potential downside of 7.9% is nearly twice any realistic near-term upside, creating an unfavorable entry point. V9 | The stock pulls back below $19.00 (falls below the stop-loss level by more than 2%) before the next catalyst, restoring positive reward-to-risk. | Tripped→Stable |
| CounterA golden cross breakout with the stock above all major moving averages and an RSI of 65 indicates strong near-term technical momentum that could sustain prices above the resistance level. | ||
A Piotroski F-Score of only 2/9 and no durable competitive moat signal that the bank's balance sheet quality and competitive positioning are weak relative to diversified banking peers. Quality breakdown | The Piotroski F-Score improves to at least 5/9 over the next 2 annual reporting cycles as asset quality and capital metrics normalize. | →Stable |
| CounterJapanese megabanks operate under different regulatory and accounting frameworks than US peers, and Piotroski scoring may understate actual financial health for this institutional structure. | ||
Mitsubishi UFJ beat consensus earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with an average surprise of 26.5%, including a 69% beat in the most recent quarter, reflecting an earnings trajectory above market expectations. Earnings | The company continues to beat or meet consensus in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, sustaining positive earnings momentum. | ↑Improving |
| CounterThe one recent miss and a weak Piotroski F-Score of only 2/9 suggest that balance sheet quality may not support sustained outperformance beyond near-term cost optimization. | ||
A put-to-call ratio of 3.50 indicates that options participants are positioned significantly more for downside than upside, a warning signal for holders even as price momentum appears positive. Options | The put-to-call ratio declines below 1.5 within 60 days as hedging pressure eases after the next earnings report. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterElevated put-call ratios in ADR-listed foreign bank stocks frequently reflect currency hedging by institutional holders rather than directional bearishness on the equity itself. | ||
With the stock at $20.18 already above the $19.98 price target, the asymmetry ratio is -1.93, meaning potential downside of 7.9% is nearly twice any realistic near-term upside, creating an unfavorable entry point.
Tripped→StableV9
- Expectation
- The stock pulls back below $19.00 (falls below the stop-loss level by more than 2%) before the next catalyst, restoring positive reward-to-risk.
CounterA golden cross breakout with the stock above all major moving averages and an RSI of 65 indicates strong near-term technical momentum that could sustain prices above the resistance level.
A Piotroski F-Score of only 2/9 and no durable competitive moat signal that the bank's balance sheet quality and competitive positioning are weak relative to diversified banking peers.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- The Piotroski F-Score improves to at least 5/9 over the next 2 annual reporting cycles as asset quality and capital metrics normalize.
CounterJapanese megabanks operate under different regulatory and accounting frameworks than US peers, and Piotroski scoring may understate actual financial health for this institutional structure.
Mitsubishi UFJ beat consensus earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with an average surprise of 26.5%, including a 69% beat in the most recent quarter, reflecting an earnings trajectory above market expectations.
↑ImprovingEarnings
- Expectation
- The company continues to beat or meet consensus in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, sustaining positive earnings momentum.
CounterThe one recent miss and a weak Piotroski F-Score of only 2/9 suggest that balance sheet quality may not support sustained outperformance beyond near-term cost optimization.
A put-to-call ratio of 3.50 indicates that options participants are positioned significantly more for downside than upside, a warning signal for holders even as price momentum appears positive.
↓DeterioratingOptions
- Expectation
- The put-to-call ratio declines below 1.5 within 60 days as hedging pressure eases after the next earnings report.
CounterElevated put-call ratios in ADR-listed foreign bank stocks frequently reflect currency hedging by institutional holders rather than directional bearishness on the equity itself.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.2 |
| ROA | 0.3 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Moat | 5.4 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Strong margins: 27%
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
Growth
9.8/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 9.7 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong growth: 29% YoY
Momentum
6.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 3.7 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 2.5 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.9 |
| Price target | 4.1 |
| erm sentiment | 5.6 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (2.0) — signal dampened
Insider
5.8/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.5 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.4/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.1 |
| quality rank | 1.6 |
| growth rank | 8.9 |
- ▸Industry growth leader
Technical
4.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.4 |
| support resistance | 1.0 |
| 52w position | 9.8 |
Risk (lower is worse)
8.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 10.0 |
| days to cover | 9.4 |
| volatility | 7.1 |
| put call | 7.4 |
| implied vol | 8.1 |
| beta | 10.0 |
Catalyst
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.5 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_HOLDPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:6.1>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:89d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-2.8=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-2.80
Upside
-20.4%
Downside
7.3%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:6.1>=5.5. Top dim: Growth at 9.8; weakest: Technical at 4.1. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 9.8, Risk (lower is worse) at 8.7, and Value at 6.6; the weakest are Technical at 4.1, Sentiment at 5.2, and Quality at 5.2. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -2.80 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Strong Earnings Beat Record
Trip ifEarnings miss consensus by more than 10% in any 1 of the next 2 quarterly reports.
- P2Price Above Resistance Negative AsymmetryTripped
Trip ifStock price rises above $21.50 (surpasses the current target by more than 6%) without analyst target revision.
- P3Weak Balance Sheet Quality
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score remains below 3 for 2 consecutive annual reporting periods.
- P4Elevated Put Call Downside Hedging
Trip ifPut-to-call ratio rises above 5.0 or remains above 3.0 for more than 45 days.