Value
5.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.0 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 3.8 |
| PEG | 2.7 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 30.9x
- ▸PEG: 4.64
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Monro shows excellent cash conversion and a 41.3% gap to the analyst target, but revenue is shrinking about 5%, the last two quarters were large earnings misses, and business quality sits below the engine's 4.0 floor.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The top ten vendors account for 88.0% of stocking purchases, a high concentration the company must manage without supply disruption. Bear case | Vendor concentration stays near 88% with no supply interruption to quarterly revenue. | ↑Improving |
| CounterHeavy dependence on a few vendors gives suppliers pricing power over a business already running thin margins, and short interest of 44% shows traders expect trouble. | ||
Revenue is declining about 5%, with $287.1M in the June 2026 quarter against $301.0M a year earlier, and must stabilize for the thesis to work. Growth breakdown | Quarterly revenue should hold at or above the current $287M level and approach the $284M to $294M range of recent quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterRevenue has fallen from $322.1M in September 2023 to $287.1M and the latest quarter is a provisional figure, so the decline could continue. | ||
EPS missed in the last two quarters, at -$0.09 against a $0.02 estimate and -$0.16 against -$0.05, and must return to profit for the thesis to hold. Miss count | EPS should return to positive and meet estimates at or after the 29 October 2026 report. | ↑Improving |
| CounterAverage surprise is -159%, and the last two quarters flipped from profit of $0.16 and $0.21 to losses, so margins appear to be eroding. | ||
Cash conversion is excellent at 415% FCF to net income despite thin profits, suggesting cash generation is stronger than reported earnings. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow should stay well above net income over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe ratio is inflated by near-zero net income, and the business has no competitive moat with quality at 2.8, below the 4.0 floor. | ||
Price of $13.23 sits 41.3% below the $18.70 analyst target, against 9.5% downside to the $12.76 stop, a reward-to-risk of 4.4. Upside pct | Price should move toward the analyst target if earnings stabilize. | ↑Improving |
| CounterAnalyst coverage is light, which dampens the signal, and the stock is in a confirmed downtrend with the 200-day average falling 4.9% over 30 days. | ||
CounterHeavy dependence on a few vendors gives suppliers pricing power over a business already running thin margins, and short interest of 44% shows traders expect trouble.
CounterRevenue has fallen from $322.1M in September 2023 to $287.1M and the latest quarter is a provisional figure, so the decline could continue.
CounterAverage surprise is -159%, and the last two quarters flipped from profit of $0.16 and $0.21 to losses, so margins appear to be eroding.
CounterThe ratio is inflated by near-zero net income, and the business has no competitive moat with quality at 2.8, below the 4.0 floor.
CounterAnalyst coverage is light, which dampens the signal, and the stock is in a confirmed downtrend with the 200-day average falling 4.9% over 30 days.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.0 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 3.8 |
| PEG | 2.7 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.5 |
| ROA | 0.6 |
| Gross margin | 3.0 |
| Op margin | 0.3 |
| Net margin | 0.4 |
| Current ratio | 2.0 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 3.1 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 3.2 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 5.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 4.2 |
| Analyst rating | 6.3 |
| Price target | 9.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.1 |
| quality rank | 2.5 |
| growth rank | 0.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.6 |
| support resistance | 3.5 |
| 52w position | 2.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 0.0 |
| days to cover | 2.4 |
| volatility | 0.8 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 6.7 |
| debt equity | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.0 |
| news activity | 6.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.4B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the EARNINGS_PROXIMITY gate's 2d<=7d outcome against Insider at 7.3 and asymmetric R:R of 3.26.
The strongest dimensions are Insider at 7.3, Sentiment at 6.6, and Momentum at 5.8; the weakest are Growth at 1.4, Peer rank at 2.6, and Quality at 2.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.26 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifQuarterly revenue falls below $270M from the current $287M.
Trip ifEPS stays below $0.00 for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifFree cash flow to net income falls below 100% from the current 415%.
Trip ifAnalyst target falls below $15.00 from the current $18.70.
Trip ifTop ten vendor share of stocking purchases exceeds 90% from the current 88%.