Skip to main content
MNRO · Why this verdict

Why Monro (MNRO) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Monro shows excellent cash conversion and a 41.3% gap to the analyst target, but revenue is shrinking about 5%, the last two quarters were large earnings misses, and business quality sits below the engine's 4.0 floor.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The top ten vendors account for 88.0% of stocking purchases, a high concentration the company must manage without supply disruption.

↑Improving
Bear case
Expectation
Vendor concentration stays near 88% with no supply interruption to quarterly revenue.

CounterHeavy dependence on a few vendors gives suppliers pricing power over a business already running thin margins, and short interest of 44% shows traders expect trouble.

Revenue is declining about 5%, with $287.1M in the June 2026 quarter against $301.0M a year earlier, and must stabilize for the thesis to work.

→Stable
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Quarterly revenue should hold at or above the current $287M level and approach the $284M to $294M range of recent quarters.

CounterRevenue has fallen from $322.1M in September 2023 to $287.1M and the latest quarter is a provisional figure, so the decline could continue.

EPS missed in the last two quarters, at -$0.09 against a $0.02 estimate and -$0.16 against -$0.05, and must return to profit for the thesis to hold.

↑Improving
Miss count
Expectation
EPS should return to positive and meet estimates at or after the 29 October 2026 report.

CounterAverage surprise is -159%, and the last two quarters flipped from profit of $0.16 and $0.21 to losses, so margins appear to be eroding.

Cash conversion is excellent at 415% FCF to net income despite thin profits, suggesting cash generation is stronger than reported earnings.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free cash flow should stay well above net income over the next 12 months.

CounterThe ratio is inflated by near-zero net income, and the business has no competitive moat with quality at 2.8, below the 4.0 floor.

Price of $13.23 sits 41.3% below the $18.70 analyst target, against 9.5% downside to the $12.76 stop, a reward-to-risk of 4.4.

↑Improving
Upside pct
Expectation
Price should move toward the analyst target if earnings stabilize.

CounterAnalyst coverage is light, which dampens the signal, and the stock is in a confirmed downtrend with the 200-day average falling 4.9% over 30 days.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E2.0
P/S10.0
EV/EBITDA5.3
Fwd P/E3.8
PEG2.7
Analyst target9.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 30.9x
  • ▸PEG: 4.64

Quality

2.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.5
ROA0.6
Gross margin3.0
Op margin0.3
Net margin0.4
Current ratio2.0
FCF quality10.0
Moat3.1
Piotroski F5.6
  • ▸Excellent cash conversion: 415% FCF/NI
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Quality concerns

Growth

1.4/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth1.4
  • ▸Declining revenue: -5%

Momentum

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.5
MACD3.2
OBV10.0
MA position6.0
Volume5.3
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -4.9%/30d — confirmed downtrend

Sentiment

6.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment4.2
Analyst rating6.3
Price target9.6
  • ▸Light analyst coverage (4.0) — signal dampened
  • ▸Analyst upside: 54%

Insider

7.3/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change10.0
notable moves7.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
  • ▸Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

2.6/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank4.1
quality rank2.5
growth rank0.3

Technical

2.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger2.6
support resistance3.5
52w position2.5

Risk (lower is worse)

3.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest0.0
days to cover2.4
volatility0.8
put call10.0
implied vol0.0
max pain risk3.0
beta6.7
debt equity5.6
  • ▸High short interest: 44%
  • ▸High IV: 96%
  • ▸Above max pain $2
  • ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

3.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.0
dividend safety4.0
news activity6.0
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
  • ▸Earnings in 2 days
  • ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOOR
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:5.8>=5.5
  • ASYMMETRY:3.3>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:2d<=7d
Warning (1)
  • DEATH_CROSS:momentum=5.8>=5.0 recovering
Reward-to-Risk
3.26
Upside
+30.5%
Downside
9.4%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.4B<$5B

Investment implication

The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the EARNINGS_PROXIMITY gate's 2d<=7d outcome against Insider at 7.3 and asymmetric R:R of 3.26.

The strongest dimensions are Insider at 7.3, Sentiment at 6.6, and Momentum at 5.8; the weakest are Growth at 1.4, Peer rank at 2.6, and Quality at 2.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.26 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Revenue Decline Stabilizes

    Trip ifQuarterly revenue falls below $270M from the current $287M.

  • P2Earnings Miss Reversal

    Trip ifEPS stays below $0.00 for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3Strong Cash Conversion

    Trip ifFree cash flow to net income falls below 100% from the current 415%.

  • P4Analyst Target Upside

    Trip ifAnalyst target falls below $15.00 from the current $18.70.

  • P5Vendor Concentration Manageable

    Trip ifTop ten vendor share of stocking purchases exceeds 90% from the current 88%.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › MNRO › Why this verdict