Value
6.2/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.4 |
| PEG | 3.1 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 27.8x
- ▸PEG: 3.96
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Quality is scored 3.1, below the engine's 4.0 floor, despite excellent cash conversion of 1000% FCF-to-net-income. Quality breakdown | The overall quality score should cross above 4.0 as moat and margin components strengthen alongside the strong cash conversion. | →Stable |
| CounterA cash-conversion ratio this extreme, at 1000%, can reflect one-time working-capital effects rather than a durable, repeatable pattern. | ||
The V9 asymmetry gate failed narrowly at a 1.03 ratio versus the 1.5 threshold, with modeled upside of 15.4% close to the modeled 15% downside. Engine gate (failed) | The asymmetry ratio should rise above 1.5 as the upcoming earnings catalyst resolves favorably. | →Stable |
| CounterA ratio this close to the threshold, at 1.03 versus 1.5, suggests the setup is nearly balanced rather than genuinely unfavorable. | ||
The engine flags an upcoming earnings catalyst in 25 days, building on a 3-of-4 beat streak, as the primary identified trading edge. Edge rationale | The company should extend its beat streak to at least 3 of the next 4 quarters at the upcoming earnings report. | →Stable |
| CounterThe single miss in the streak, at -196.3% surprise, was also the most recent quarter, which could signal the beat pattern is breaking down heading into the catalyst. | ||
Revenue is declining at -7% as flagged in the growth dimension, pressuring the overall growth score to just 0.7. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth should turn positive as store traffic or same-store sales trends recover. | →Stable |
| CounterStrong recent earnings beats suggest cost control and margin management are offsetting the top-line revenue decline. | ||
Short interest is elevated at 28% of float, contributing to the risk profile alongside high implied volatility of 95%. Risk breakdown | Short interest should decline from 28% as the quality and growth concerns are resolved or priced in. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh short interest combined with rising OBV volume accumulation and an approaching earnings catalyst could set up a short-covering rally. | ||
CounterA cash-conversion ratio this extreme, at 1000%, can reflect one-time working-capital effects rather than a durable, repeatable pattern.
CounterA ratio this close to the threshold, at 1.03 versus 1.5, suggests the setup is nearly balanced rather than genuinely unfavorable.
CounterThe single miss in the streak, at -196.3% surprise, was also the most recent quarter, which could signal the beat pattern is breaking down heading into the catalyst.
CounterStrong recent earnings beats suggest cost control and margin management are offsetting the top-line revenue decline.
CounterHigh short interest combined with rising OBV volume accumulation and an approaching earnings catalyst could set up a short-covering rally.
MNRO screens with excellent cash conversion and an earnings catalyst backed by a 3-of-4 beat streak, but quality sits below the engine's floor, the asymmetry gate narrowly failed, revenue is declining, and short interest is elevated.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.4 |
| PEG | 3.1 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.1 |
| ROA | 0.9 |
| Gross margin | 3.0 |
| Op margin | 2.2 |
| Net margin | 0.1 |
| Current ratio | 1.8 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 3.9 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.8 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.2 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 8.9 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.8 |
| quality rank | 1.9 |
| growth rank | 1.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.9 |
| support resistance | 1.1 |
| 52w position | 4.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 0.0 |
| days to cover | 5.3 |
| volatility | 2.1 |
| put call | 8.8 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 7.0 |
| beta | 6.9 |
| debt equity | 6.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 24d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.5B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Sentiment at 6.3 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:1.0<1.5@spot.
The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 6.3, Value at 6.2, and Momentum at 6.2; the weakest are Growth at 0.7, Peer rank at 2.5, and Technical at 2.6. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.01 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0, clearing the engine's quality floor.
Trip ifAsymmetry ratio exceeds 1.5, clearing the V9 gate that currently fails at 1.03.
Trip ifEarnings beat rate falls below 2 of the next 4 reported quarters, including the upcoming report.
Trip ifRevenue growth turns positive and exceeds 0% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifShort interest falls below 15% of float, well off the current 28% reading.