Value
8.4/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.6 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.6 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.4 |
| PEG | 7.7 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 9.0x
- ▸PEG: 0.88
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The stock trades approximately 74.5% below the analyst-derived price target, offering a risk/reward ratio of approximately 10.6-to-1 in favor of buyers — a dislocation consistent with a business that screens attractively on forward earnings (7.8x P/E, PEG of 0.65) but is caught in a confirmed technical downtrend. Price targets | Price closes above $20 within 6 months, reflecting initial progress toward closing the gap to analyst consensus. | →Stable |
| CounterThe confirmed downtrend (200-day moving average declining at 3.6% per month), the absence of a competitive moat, and elevated leverage suggest the wide gap to analyst target reflects genuine business concerns rather than a temporary dislocation. | ||
Free cash flow runs at approximately ten times net income — the business converts operating activity into cash at an exceptional rate despite near-zero GAAP profitability, supported by a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 reflecting broad balance sheet health. Quality breakdown | Operating cash flow remains positive and free cash flow stays above net income for the next 4 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterA near-zero net margin means any revenue or cost headwind could tip GAAP earnings negative; elevated leverage (debt-to-equity of 1.3) amplifies downside risk if cash generation falters. | ||
An earnings report is due in approximately 8 days, creating an imminent binary catalyst; the most recent quarter was a miss (-4.4%), so the upcoming print will determine whether that was an isolated setback or the beginning of a deteriorating execution trend. Catalyst breakdown | The upcoming earnings report delivers a positive surprise, consistent with the beat pattern seen two of the three quarters before the recent miss. | →Stable |
| CounterImplied volatility has reached 174%, indicating the options market is pricing significant downside risk from the print; a second consecutive miss would likely extend the downtrend materially. | ||
A combination of elevated leverage (debt-to-equity of 1.3), below-average profitability metrics, and soft revenue growth creates a challenging environment for the stock to re-rate toward the wide analyst consensus gap without a sustained fundamental catalyst. Bear case | If the bear thesis holds, price stays below $20 for the next 12 months despite apparent cheapness on a forward P/E basis. | →Stable |
| CounterAt a forward P/E of 7.8x and PEG of 0.65, the growth that does exist is more than priced in; a debt refinancing or even modest margin recovery could shift the narrative and close the gap to analyst targets. | ||
CounterThe confirmed downtrend (200-day moving average declining at 3.6% per month), the absence of a competitive moat, and elevated leverage suggest the wide gap to analyst target reflects genuine business concerns rather than a temporary dislocation.
CounterA near-zero net margin means any revenue or cost headwind could tip GAAP earnings negative; elevated leverage (debt-to-equity of 1.3) amplifies downside risk if cash generation falters.
CounterImplied volatility has reached 174%, indicating the options market is pricing significant downside risk from the print; a second consecutive miss would likely extend the downtrend materially.
CounterAt a forward P/E of 7.8x and PEG of 0.65, the growth that does exist is more than priced in; a debt refinancing or even modest margin recovery could shift the narrative and close the gap to analyst targets.
MillerKnoll trades roughly 43% below the analyst consensus price target with exceptional free cash flow conversion relative to near-zero GAAP earnings, but a confirmed downtrend, elevated leverage, and an imminent earnings report create material near-term binary risk.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.6 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.6 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.4 |
| PEG | 7.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.3 |
| ROA | 2.2 |
| Gross margin | 3.8 |
| Op margin | 2.5 |
| Net margin | 1.2 |
| Current ratio | 5.7 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 4.5 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.1 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.5 |
| Volume | 0.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.6 |
| Price target | 9.8 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.0 |
| quality rank | 3.5 |
| growth rank | 4.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.4 |
| support resistance | 0.8 |
| 52w position | 8.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.8 |
| days to cover | 6.4 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 5.1 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 5.6 |
| debt equity | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 7.4 |
| dividend safety | 6.0 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 78
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.5B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.35>1.3, MCap $1.5B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.0 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 8.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Current asymmetry R:R is 2.82 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.4, Sentiment at 6.8, and Momentum at 6.4; the weakest are Technical at 3.5, Growth at 3.6, and Risk (lower is worse) at 3.9. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.82 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifPrice declines below $13, widening the drawdown beyond 17% from current levels and indicating the downtrend is accelerating rather than bottoming.
Trip ifFree cash flow falls below $0 for 2 consecutive quarters, undermining the cash-conversion quality thesis.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in both the upcoming and the following quarterly reports, confirming sequential execution deterioration.
Trip ifRevenue grows more than 10% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters, disproving the weak-growth bear premise.