Value
7.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.5 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 21.8x
- ▸PEG: 0.42
- ▸Attractively valued
MGM · Why this verdict
Why MGM Resorts International (MGM) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.1/10
ConfidenceHIGH
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Exceptional free cash conversion and above-average technical positioning are insufficient to overcome a stretched balance sheet, inconsistent earnings delivery, and negative risk/reward geometry after the stock exceeded its analyst price target.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Consensus analyst targets imply the stock has already surpassed fair value by approximately 14%, leaving no upside cushion and making the risk/reward unfavorable for initiating or adding to positions. Warnings | Analyst consensus price target is revised upward by more than 15% within 2 quarters, restoring meaningful headroom to a new entry. | ↑Improving |
| CounterRSI at 78 suggests near-term overbought conditions that may correct before a broader re-rating — a pullback alone would not invalidate the thesis if underlying business trends improve. | ||
A debt-to-equity ratio of 9.5 represents elevated financial leverage that limits balance sheet flexibility and amplifies downside sensitivity to any deterioration in operating cash flows. Bear case | Debt-to-equity ratio declines below 6.0 over the next four quarters through debt paydown or equity-building earnings. | ↑Improving |
| CounterFree cash flow running at 290% of reported net income provides a meaningful debt-service buffer, suggesting the leverage may be manageable if operating cash generation is sustained. | ||
Free cash flow at 290% of reported net income indicates the business generates substantially more cash than earnings reflect, providing capacity to service debt and return capital. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow remains above 200% of net income for 4 consecutive quarters. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterNo competitive moat is identified, meaning cash flows depend entirely on sustained operating execution without a structural defense, making the 290% ratio less durable than it would be in a defensible franchise. | ||
The earnings record shows two beats and two misses over the last four quarters, including recent misses, signaling unreliable earnings delivery that undermines the investment case. Catalyst breakdown | EPS surprise remains positive and exceeds 5% for 3 consecutive quarters. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterThe average surprise across all four quarters is strongly positive at more than 57%, driven by a 209% beat in one quarter, which may overstate the persistence of miss risk relative to the actual earnings trajectory. | ||
Consensus analyst targets imply the stock has already surpassed fair value by approximately 14%, leaving no upside cushion and making the risk/reward unfavorable for initiating or adding to positions.
↑ImprovingWarnings
- Expectation
- Analyst consensus price target is revised upward by more than 15% within 2 quarters, restoring meaningful headroom to a new entry.
CounterRSI at 78 suggests near-term overbought conditions that may correct before a broader re-rating — a pullback alone would not invalidate the thesis if underlying business trends improve.
A debt-to-equity ratio of 9.5 represents elevated financial leverage that limits balance sheet flexibility and amplifies downside sensitivity to any deterioration in operating cash flows.
↑ImprovingBear case
- Expectation
- Debt-to-equity ratio declines below 6.0 over the next four quarters through debt paydown or equity-building earnings.
CounterFree cash flow running at 290% of reported net income provides a meaningful debt-service buffer, suggesting the leverage may be manageable if operating cash generation is sustained.
Free cash flow at 290% of reported net income indicates the business generates substantially more cash than earnings reflect, providing capacity to service debt and return capital.
↓DeterioratingQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Free cash flow remains above 200% of net income for 4 consecutive quarters.
CounterNo competitive moat is identified, meaning cash flows depend entirely on sustained operating execution without a structural defense, making the 290% ratio less durable than it would be in a defensible franchise.
The earnings record shows two beats and two misses over the last four quarters, including recent misses, signaling unreliable earnings delivery that undermines the investment case.
↓DeterioratingCatalyst breakdown
- Expectation
- EPS surprise remains positive and exceeds 5% for 3 consecutive quarters.
CounterThe average surprise across all four quarters is strongly positive at more than 57%, driven by a 209% beat in one quarter, which may overstate the persistence of miss risk relative to the actual earnings trajectory.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
4.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 9.0 |
| ROA | 1.1 |
| Gross margin | 4.7 |
| Op margin | 0.9 |
| Net margin | 2.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.7 |
| FCF quality | 9.3 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
- ▸Excellent ROE: 27%
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 128% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
Growth
2.3/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.3 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -1%
Momentum
5.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.3 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -2.3%/30d — confirmed downtrend
Sentiment
6.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 3.2 |
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 7.7 |
- ▸LLM news sentiment: -0.36 (n=2)
- ▸Analyst upside: 20%
Insider
8.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 9.0 |
| insider conviction | 8.0 |
| holder change | 9.8 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
- ▸Heavy insider buying — $51,740,827 (0.628% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
3.5/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.2 |
| quality rank | 5.4 |
| growth rank | 2.3 |
Technical
2.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.9 |
| support resistance | 1.8 |
| 52w position | 2.4 |
| gap | 6.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.2 |
| days to cover | 6.5 |
| volatility | 2.7 |
| put call | 7.9 |
| implied vol | 4.5 |
| max pain risk | 7.0 |
| beta | 5.7 |
| debt equity | 0.0 |
- ▸Short squeeze setup: 19% short, quality 7.5
Catalyst
4.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| news activity | 6.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (6)
- MOMENTUM:5.5>=4.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:90d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:0.6<1.5@spot
Warning (2)
- MOMENTUM:5.5<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
- DEATH_CROSS:momentum=5.5>=5.0 recovering
Reward-to-Risk
0.56
Upside
+8.4%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 67
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.32>1.3
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 1.6 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Insider at 8.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:0.6<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.56 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Insider at 8.4, Value at 7.1, and Sentiment at 6.1; the weakest are Growth at 2.3, Technical at 2.8, and Peer rank at 3.5. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.56 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Analyst Target Exceeded No Upside
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises more than 15% above current price for 2 consecutive months.
- P2High Leverage Balance Sheet Risk
Trip ifDebt-to-equity ratio falls below 6.0 for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Strong Free Cash Conversion
Trip ifFree cash flow falls below 150% of net income for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4Inconsistent Earnings Delivery
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 5% for 3 consecutive quarters.