Skip to main content
MEIMethode Electronics, Inc.Sell5.7·$15.16
MEI · Why this verdict

Why Methode Electronics (MEI) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Methode Electronics is a loss-making small-cap electronic components maker with weak quality (2.8/10), repeated earnings misses and a technical breakout, where 27% analyst-target upside depends on turning losses around.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Revenue in the latest quarter was $265.4M versus $240.5M a year earlier, a gain of about 10%, near the $257.7M estimate for the next quarter.

→Stable
Revenue quarters
Expectation
Quarterly revenue should stay above $250M over the next 12 months.

CounterRevenue is below the $292.6M and $288.0M levels of late 2024 and 2023, so the recent gain may be a bounce off a low base.

Quality scores 2.8/10, below the engine's 4.0 floor, with return on equity, gross margin, operating margin and net margin components all at or near 0 and no competitive moat.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Margins should recover enough for the quality score to rise above 4.0 within 12 months.

CounterThe Piotroski F-Score is a strong 8/9 and the current ratio component is 8.2, suggesting financial health is intact despite weak reported margins.

EPS missed estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters (latest -$0.22 against -$0.20), with an average surprise of -33.8%, so losses are persisting.

→Stable
Earnings
Expectation
Quarterly losses should narrow and EPS should approach break-even by the next 12 months.

CounterThe latest miss was only 10% and the loss per share is at its smallest of the recent misses, which could mark the start of stabilization.

A golden cross with the price above all moving averages and a MACD that is bullish give a momentum score of 7.4/10 and a breakout setup.

→Stable
Chart pattern detection
Expectation
Momentum should hold at or above 5.5 as the breakout confirms.

CounterThe stock showed an extreme gap down of 6.7% and implied volatility of 77%, so the breakout could fail quickly on weak results.

The analyst target of $18.70 is 27.0% above the $14.72 price, with a reward-to-risk of 1.8 against 15.0% downside.

↓Deteriorating
Analyst target
Expectation
The price should advance toward the $18.70 target as earnings stabilize.

CounterAnalysts set targets for a company that has missed estimates in 3 of 4 quarters, so the target may be cut rather than reached.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.2/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/S10.0
EV/EBITDA5.3
Fwd P/E3.0
PEG10.0
Analyst target7.5
  • ▸Forward P/E: 35.9x
  • ▸PEG: 0.26
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

2.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.0
ROA0.3
Gross margin0.0
Op margin0.0
Net margin0.0
Current ratio8.2
Moat5.0
Piotroski F8.9
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
  • ▸Quality concerns

Growth

7.5/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth5.1
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

7.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD9.6
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume5.0
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

6.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target9.4
erm sentiment5.0
  • ▸Analyst upside: 45%

Insider

7.3/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change10.0
notable moves7.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
  • ▸Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

4.0/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank9.6
quality rank1.1
growth rank1.9

Technical

3.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger3.0
support resistance1.9
52w position5.0
gap5.0

Risk (lower is worse)

3.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest5.1
days to cover4.9
volatility0.0
put call4.4
implied vol0.0
max pain risk3.0
beta4.8
debt equity8.0
  • ▸High IV: 83%
  • ▸Above max pain $2
  • ▸Concentration risks: 2 MED (10-K Item 1A)

Catalyst

3.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history0.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.0
dividend safety6.8
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 0B/3M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOOR
Passed (8)
  • MOMENTUM:7.8>=5.5
  • ASYMMETRY:1.6>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:30d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (0)

none

Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
1.56
Upside
+23.4%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 50, MACD bullish

EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.5B) below institutional reach

SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.56>1.3, MCap $0.5B<$5B

Investment implication

The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects clean gate clearance against Momentum at 7.8 and asymmetric R:R of 1.56.

The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 7.8, Growth at 7.5, and Insider at 7.3; the weakest are Quality at 2.8, Catalyst at 3.4, and Technical at 3.7. The V9 engine cleared all gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.56 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Weak Business Quality

    Trip ifOverall quality score stays below 2.8 and fails to rise above 4.0 for 4 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Repeated Earnings Misses

    Trip ifQuarterly EPS exceeds -$0.10 (a smaller loss) in at least 2 consecutive quarters, versus -$0.22 now.

  • P3Revenue Recovery Year Over Year

    Trip ifQuarterly revenue falls below $240M from the current $265.4M.

  • P4Breakout Momentum Setup

    Trip ifMomentum score falls below 5.5 from the current 7.4.

  • P5Analyst Target Upside

    Trip ifAnalyst target falls below $15.50 so that upside drops below 5% from 27.0%.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › MEI › Why this verdict