top ten customers
“10-K Item 1: 'our top customer and top ten customers accounted for 13.6% and 62.3% of net sales, respectively'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Mayville Engineering Company, I discloses is top ten customers at 62.3%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Mayville Engineering Company, I’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'our top customer and top ten customers accounted for 13.6% and 62.3% of net sales, respectively'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'our largest customers in 2025 included PACCAR Inc. and John Deere which accounted for 13.6% and 10.0% of our net sales, respectively'”
“10-K Item 1: 'we provide John Deere, a leading customer, with 2025 net sales accounting for 10.0% of our total revenue'”
Mayville Engineering's revenue is heavily dependent on a small set of customers: its top ten customers accounted for 62.3% of net sales, a high-disclosed-size dependency that leaves the majority of the business tied to a limited group of relationships. Within that concentration, no single customer dominates disproportionately — PACCAR accounted for 13.6% and John Deere for 10.0% of net sales, each individually a low-disclosed-size exposure. This is a case where the aggregate top-ten concentration is far more consequential than any single named customer: the two largest disclosed customers together represent less than a quarter of sales, meaning a substantial remainder of the top-ten figure is spread across additional relationships not individually broken out. The high-disclosed-size top-ten concentration is the exposure most likely to move a verdict, since it indicates the business's fortunes are closely tied to the ordering patterns and end-market health of a handful of large industrial customers, while PACCAR and John Deere individually present more modest, low-disclosed-size counterparty risk. Diversifying the customer base beyond this concentrated top tier would be the clearest lever to reduce this exposure over time.
For the engine’s reasoning on MEC’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESAB | ESAB Corporation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| ATI | ATI Inc. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MEC● | Mayville Engineering Company, I | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| CMC | Commercial Metals Company | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CRS | Carpenter Technology Corporatio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPGI | GPGI, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.