Value
5.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.4 |
| P/S | 8.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.1 |
| PEG | 4.4 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 17.6x
- ▸PEG: 2.09
MAS · Why this verdict
Why Masco (MAS) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company has beaten earnings estimates in 3 of the past 4 quarters, including an 18.6% upside surprise in the most recent print, demonstrating consistent operational execution relative to consensus expectations and an average quarterly surprise of roughly 9%. Earnings | The beat streak extends to 4 of the next 5 quarters, with average quarterly EPS surprise remaining above 5% over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe one recent miss (-5.7% surprise) came in the quarter just before the latest large beat, suggesting earnings delivery is less consistent than the headline beat count implies; analyst estimates may now be set too high. | ||
The company's financial health is broad-based and strong, reflected in a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 — signaling improvement across profitability, leverage, and efficiency metrics simultaneously — alongside solid free cash flow quality. Quality breakdown | Piotroski F-Score remains at 7 or above for the next 4 reporting periods, confirming sustained financial quality rather than a one-cycle peak. | →Stable |
| CounterThe elevated debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 122% introduces meaningful financial leverage that a high Piotroski score can mask; a revenue slowdown in housing-related end markets could pressure this quality profile quickly. | ||
Debt stands at approximately 122% of equity, above the level that would be expected for a steady-state industrial business, constraining the company's capacity to invest, acquire, or return capital if operating conditions soften. Bear case | Debt-to-equity improves to below 90% within 12 months through cash generation or deliberate paydown, reducing the financial risk premium the market applies. | →Stable |
| CounterAt a forward earnings multiple of roughly 15.8x and with strong free cash flow conversion, the company may sustain this leverage level comfortably if borrowing costs remain stable, making the risk theoretical rather than near-term. | ||
The stock is just below its near-term price target with only about 0.6% remaining upside against roughly 5.5% potential downside, a risk/reward ratio of roughly 0.11-to-1 that makes the current setup unattractive for new positions and argues for patience or trimming. Price targets | A compelling re-entry emerges if the stock pulls back at least 10% from current levels, restoring upside to the target above 10% and producing a risk/reward above 1.5-to-1. | →Stable |
| CounterStrong technical momentum — golden cross in place, above all moving averages, MACD bullish — combined with continued earnings beats could push the stock meaningfully through its current target, making the near-term geometry a conservative floor rather than a ceiling. | ||
The company has beaten earnings estimates in 3 of the past 4 quarters, including an 18.6% upside surprise in the most recent print, demonstrating consistent operational execution relative to consensus expectations and an average quarterly surprise of roughly 9%.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- The beat streak extends to 4 of the next 5 quarters, with average quarterly EPS surprise remaining above 5% over the next 12 months.
CounterThe one recent miss (-5.7% surprise) came in the quarter just before the latest large beat, suggesting earnings delivery is less consistent than the headline beat count implies; analyst estimates may now be set too high.
The company's financial health is broad-based and strong, reflected in a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 — signaling improvement across profitability, leverage, and efficiency metrics simultaneously — alongside solid free cash flow quality.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Piotroski F-Score remains at 7 or above for the next 4 reporting periods, confirming sustained financial quality rather than a one-cycle peak.
CounterThe elevated debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 122% introduces meaningful financial leverage that a high Piotroski score can mask; a revenue slowdown in housing-related end markets could pressure this quality profile quickly.
Debt stands at approximately 122% of equity, above the level that would be expected for a steady-state industrial business, constraining the company's capacity to invest, acquire, or return capital if operating conditions soften.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Debt-to-equity improves to below 90% within 12 months through cash generation or deliberate paydown, reducing the financial risk premium the market applies.
CounterAt a forward earnings multiple of roughly 15.8x and with strong free cash flow conversion, the company may sustain this leverage level comfortably if borrowing costs remain stable, making the risk theoretical rather than near-term.
The stock is just below its near-term price target with only about 0.6% remaining upside against roughly 5.5% potential downside, a risk/reward ratio of roughly 0.11-to-1 that makes the current setup unattractive for new positions and argues for patience or trimming.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- A compelling re-entry emerges if the stock pulls back at least 10% from current levels, restoring upside to the target above 10% and producing a risk/reward above 1.5-to-1.
CounterStrong technical momentum — golden cross in place, above all moving averages, MACD bullish — combined with continued earnings beats could push the stock meaningfully through its current target, making the near-term geometry a conservative floor rather than a ceiling.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Masco Corporation is a high-quality building products franchise with a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 and a consistent earnings beat track record, but the stock has nearly reached its near-term price target, leaving only about 0.6% upside against roughly 5.5% downside — a geometry that makes new entry unattractive and rewards patience. Elevated debt at roughly 122% of equity adds a layer of financial risk to an otherwise well-run business.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROA | 10.0 |
| Gross margin | 3.1 |
| Op margin | 6.6 |
| Net margin | 5.4 |
| Current ratio | 6.3 |
| FCF quality | 6.4 |
| Moat | 6.1 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
5.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.1 |
| EPS growth | 6.0 |
Momentum
6.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.1 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 1.3 |
- ▸Overbought (RSI 79)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.4 |
| Price target | 4.7 |
| erm sentiment | 5.2 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.3/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.8 |
| quality rank | 8.3 |
| growth rank | 6.2 |
- ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
- ▸Superior ROE vs peers
Technical
3.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.7 |
| support resistance | 0.3 |
| 52w position | 9.9 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.9 |
| days to cover | 6.0 |
| volatility | 5.2 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 4.4 |
| beta | 5.9 |
| debt equity | 0.0 |
Catalyst
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 7.1 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
- ▸Dividend: 155.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (6)
- MOMENTUM:6.9>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:25d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-0.8=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.79
Upside
-11.9%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 25d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.1 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Momentum at 6.9) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.8=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.79 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 6.9, Quality at 6.6, and Sentiment at 5.9; the weakest are Technical at 3.6, Insider at 5.0, and Growth at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.79 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Consistent Earnings Execution
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -5% for 2 consecutive quarters, breaking the beat pattern.
- P2Strong Financial Health
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6 for 2 consecutive reporting periods.
- P3Elevated Leverage Risk
Trip ifDebt-to-equity ratio falls below 80% for 2 consecutive reporting periods, confirming meaningful deleveraging.
- P4Target Exhausted Upside
Trip ifUpside to analyst price target exceeds 15%, indicating the stock has pulled back sufficiently to restore a favorable risk/reward.