Value
3.1/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 5.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| p ocf | 4.5 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸P/OCF: 25.3x (FFO proxy — REITs gated off P/E)
MAC · Why this verdict
Why Macerich Company (The) (MAC) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.5/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Revenue has declined 7% on a year-over-year basis, a trajectory noted explicitly in the growth assessment, which undermines the case for a valuation premium in a sector where cash flow growth is the primary driver of investor returns. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth turns positive — above 0% year-over-year — for 2 consecutive quarters, reversing the current contraction trend. | →Stable |
| CounterThe earnings growth component scores positively, suggesting that the company may be cutting costs or pruning low-margin assets faster than revenues are falling, which could stabilize or expand cash flow margins even as top-line contracts. | ||
Three of the last four quarters ended in a miss, with the most recent quarter delivering a 59% negative surprise on EPS — a pattern that indicates either structurally optimistic analyst models or genuine operational difficulty meeting expectations. Catalyst breakdown | EPS surprise turns positive and stays above 0% for 2 consecutive quarters, signaling that the execution gap between guidance and delivery has closed. | →Stable |
| CounterThe single beat in the set registered a 488% positive surprise, indicating that when the company clears the bar it does so by a wide margin — a lumpy earnings pattern may reflect timing of property-level events rather than a systematic execution deficit. | ||
At a price-to-operating-cash-flow of 23.8x and with the current price already 15.7% above the analyst consensus target, the stock is priced for an outcome that analysts do not currently project — an asymmetry that favors downside. Key risks | Analyst consensus price target is revised upward to above $29 (at least 15% above current price), validating the current trading level with fresh fundamental support. | →Stable |
| CounterStrong momentum (RSI 78, MACD bullish, above 200-day moving average) and a low put/call ratio of 0.027 suggest the market is not pricing in the downside risk that the valuation gap implies; call-heavy options activity may reflect institutional confidence in a rerating. | ||
An explicitly flagged yield trap warning — high dividend yield but assessed as unsafe — combined with a quality score of 3.1 (below the 4.0 minimum floor) and no assessed competitive moat suggests the dividend is at risk and the business lacks the structural characteristics to sustain it. Catalyst breakdown | Quality score improves above 4.0 and the dividend coverage ratio normalizes above 100% of free cash flow for 2 consecutive quarters, removing the yield trap designation. | →Stable |
| CounterFCF margin of 39% and an FCF yield of 5.5% indicate the company does generate positive free cash flow; the yield trap flag may overstate the near-term payout risk if asset dispositions or leasing improvements strengthen coverage. | ||
Revenue has declined 7% on a year-over-year basis, a trajectory noted explicitly in the growth assessment, which undermines the case for a valuation premium in a sector where cash flow growth is the primary driver of investor returns.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth turns positive — above 0% year-over-year — for 2 consecutive quarters, reversing the current contraction trend.
CounterThe earnings growth component scores positively, suggesting that the company may be cutting costs or pruning low-margin assets faster than revenues are falling, which could stabilize or expand cash flow margins even as top-line contracts.
Three of the last four quarters ended in a miss, with the most recent quarter delivering a 59% negative surprise on EPS — a pattern that indicates either structurally optimistic analyst models or genuine operational difficulty meeting expectations.
→StableCatalyst breakdown
- Expectation
- EPS surprise turns positive and stays above 0% for 2 consecutive quarters, signaling that the execution gap between guidance and delivery has closed.
CounterThe single beat in the set registered a 488% positive surprise, indicating that when the company clears the bar it does so by a wide margin — a lumpy earnings pattern may reflect timing of property-level events rather than a systematic execution deficit.
At a price-to-operating-cash-flow of 23.8x and with the current price already 15.7% above the analyst consensus target, the stock is priced for an outcome that analysts do not currently project — an asymmetry that favors downside.
→StableKey risks
- Expectation
- Analyst consensus price target is revised upward to above $29 (at least 15% above current price), validating the current trading level with fresh fundamental support.
CounterStrong momentum (RSI 78, MACD bullish, above 200-day moving average) and a low put/call ratio of 0.027 suggest the market is not pricing in the downside risk that the valuation gap implies; call-heavy options activity may reflect institutional confidence in a rerating.
An explicitly flagged yield trap warning — high dividend yield but assessed as unsafe — combined with a quality score of 3.1 (below the 4.0 minimum floor) and no assessed competitive moat suggests the dividend is at risk and the business lacks the structural characteristics to sustain it.
→StableCatalyst breakdown
- Expectation
- Quality score improves above 4.0 and the dividend coverage ratio normalizes above 100% of free cash flow for 2 consecutive quarters, removing the yield trap designation.
CounterFCF margin of 39% and an FCF yield of 5.5% indicate the company does generate positive free cash flow; the yield trap flag may overstate the near-term payout risk if asset dispositions or leasing improvements strengthen coverage.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Macerich trades well above its analyst price target with quality below the minimum acceptable threshold, revenue in decline, and three earnings misses in four quarters — the current price is pricing in a recovery that the fundamentals have not yet delivered.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.9 |
| Gross margin | 7.0 |
| Op margin | 3.6 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 1.2 |
| FCF quality | 6.0 |
| Moat | 4.0 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
- ▸FCF-positive but moderate margins (FCF margin 39%, FCF yield 5.1%)
- ▸No competitive moat
Growth
5.4/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.8 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -7%
Momentum
5.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 4.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 7.0 |
| Analyst rating | 7.3 |
| Price target | 4.7 |
- ▸LLM news sentiment: +0.40 (n=1)
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
2.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.8 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 0.4 |
Technical
4.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.2 |
| support resistance | 0.7 |
| 52w position | 9.8 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.8 |
| days to cover | 6.0 |
| volatility | 5.3 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.9 |
| beta | 3.1 |
| debt equity | 3.0 |
- ▸High IV: 75%
Catalyst
5.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 6.5 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 1B/3M
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:5.7>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_BOOST:ANALYST:0.40
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:35d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-1.0=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-1.03
Upside
-11.5%
Downside
11.2%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 2.06>1.3
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Sentiment at 6.4 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-1.0=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 6.4, Momentum at 5.7, and Growth at 5.4; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.8, Quality at 3.1, and Value at 3.1. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.03 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Persistent Earnings Misses
Trip ifEPS surprise rises above 0% for 2 consecutive quarters, ending the miss streak.
- P2Declining Revenue
Trip ifRevenue growth turns positive above 3% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Price Above Target Rich Valuation
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $29, closing the gap to the current trading price.
- P4Yield Trap Quality Below Floor
Trip ifQuality score improves above 4.0 and FCF coverage of the dividend exceeds 100% for 2 consecutive quarters.