Value
7.1/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.4 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 13.8x
- ▸PEG: 0.04
- ▸Attractively valued
LMRI · Why this verdict
Why Lumexa Imaging Holdings (LMRI) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
At a forward P/E of 10.5x and a PEG ratio of 0.03, the shares screen as attractively valued on near-term earnings estimates; the counterweight is a quality profile marked by no competitive moat and meaningful quality concerns, leaving open whether the low multiple is an opportunity or a reflection of justified skepticism. Valuation breakdown | Forward P/E multiple expands toward 16x over the next 12 months as the company establishes a credible earnings delivery record and quality metrics improve. | →Stable |
| CounterA single-quarter EPS miss of nearly 78% raises serious doubt about whether forward estimates are reliable; if consensus revises downward sharply, the apparent discount compresses to nothing and the cheap multiple is revealed as a value trap. | ||
Analyst consensus targets imply approximately 84% upside from the current share price, and the overall sell-side sentiment reading is broadly favorable, pointing to meaningful potential price appreciation if near-term fundamentals improve. Sentiment breakdown | Share price closes at least 30% of the gap toward the analyst consensus target over 12 months as earnings visibility improves. | →Stable |
| CounterCoverage is explicitly thin and the data flags that this dampens the signal; with few analysts, a single estimate cut could substantially narrow implied upside and shift the narrative from opportunity to value trap. | ||
The only available earnings quarter shows an actual result of $0.01 per share against a $0.05 estimate — a miss of roughly 78% — leaving the delivery track record entirely unestablished and raising material doubt about the reliability of forward earnings projections. Earnings | At least two consecutive quarters of positive EPS surprises exceeding 5% establish a reliable delivery pattern and support the bullish consensus target. | →Stable |
| CounterIf the company demonstrates consistent under-promising and over-delivering in subsequent quarters, the single large miss is reclassified as an isolated event, substantially strengthening the case for the attractively priced consensus target. | ||
At $0.90 billion in market capitalization, the company sits below the $1 billion threshold commonly applied by institutional investors, restricting the potential buyer base and limiting broad price discovery at the current level. Warnings | Market capitalization sustainably exceeds $1 billion over the next 12 months as the share price appreciates on improving fundamentals, expanding the addressable investor universe. | →Stable |
| CounterIf the stock re-rates higher on better-than-expected earnings, the market cap constraint resolves naturally; the risk then shifts entirely to fundamental execution rather than structural size exclusion. | ||
At a forward P/E of 10.5x and a PEG ratio of 0.03, the shares screen as attractively valued on near-term earnings estimates; the counterweight is a quality profile marked by no competitive moat and meaningful quality concerns, leaving open whether the low multiple is an opportunity or a reflection of justified skepticism.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- Forward P/E multiple expands toward 16x over the next 12 months as the company establishes a credible earnings delivery record and quality metrics improve.
CounterA single-quarter EPS miss of nearly 78% raises serious doubt about whether forward estimates are reliable; if consensus revises downward sharply, the apparent discount compresses to nothing and the cheap multiple is revealed as a value trap.
Analyst consensus targets imply approximately 84% upside from the current share price, and the overall sell-side sentiment reading is broadly favorable, pointing to meaningful potential price appreciation if near-term fundamentals improve.
→StableSentiment breakdown
- Expectation
- Share price closes at least 30% of the gap toward the analyst consensus target over 12 months as earnings visibility improves.
CounterCoverage is explicitly thin and the data flags that this dampens the signal; with few analysts, a single estimate cut could substantially narrow implied upside and shift the narrative from opportunity to value trap.
The only available earnings quarter shows an actual result of $0.01 per share against a $0.05 estimate — a miss of roughly 78% — leaving the delivery track record entirely unestablished and raising material doubt about the reliability of forward earnings projections.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- At least two consecutive quarters of positive EPS surprises exceeding 5% establish a reliable delivery pattern and support the bullish consensus target.
CounterIf the company demonstrates consistent under-promising and over-delivering in subsequent quarters, the single large miss is reclassified as an isolated event, substantially strengthening the case for the attractively priced consensus target.
At $0.90 billion in market capitalization, the company sits below the $1 billion threshold commonly applied by institutional investors, restricting the potential buyer base and limiting broad price discovery at the current level.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- Market capitalization sustainably exceeds $1 billion over the next 12 months as the share price appreciates on improving fundamentals, expanding the addressable investor universe.
CounterIf the stock re-rates higher on better-than-expected earnings, the market cap constraint resolves naturally; the risk then shifts entirely to fundamental execution rather than structural size exclusion.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
The shares screen at a forward P/E of 10.5x with analyst consensus implying roughly 84% upside, but a near-78% earnings miss in the only available quarter, no competitive moat, 13% short interest, and a sub-$1 billion market capitalization that restricts institutional access combine to create a speculative profile with substantial unresolved execution risk.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
2.5/10data confidence 86%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 1.4 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.2 |
| Moat | 3.9 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
3.3/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.3 |
Momentum
7.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 2.8 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.5 |
| Volume | 6.9 |
- ▸Overbought bear rally (RSI 73)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
Sentiment
7.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.7 |
| Price target | 9.1 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (7.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Analyst upside: 39%
Insider
6.5/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 6.5 |
| insider conviction | 8.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Modest insider buying — $476,863 (0.040% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.6 |
| quality rank | 4.2 |
| growth rank | 2.5 |
Technical
2.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.5 |
| 52w position | 2.8 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
3.9/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.1 |
| days to cover | 7.8 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| debt equity | 3.8 |
Catalyst
2.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:7.4>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:41d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:1.4<1.5@spot
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
1.40
Upside
+21.0%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.2B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.2B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Momentum at 7.4 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:1.4<1.5@spot.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 7.4, Sentiment at 7.4, and Value at 7.1; the weakest are Technical at 2.1, Catalyst at 2.5, and Quality at 2.5. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.40 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Forward Valuation Quality Gap
Trip ifForward EPS consensus falls below $0.47 for 2 consecutive quarters, implying a forward P/E above 20x at the current share price and eliminating the valuation discount.
- P2Analyst Consensus Large Implied Upside
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target falls below $12.00, reducing implied upside from approximately 84% to below 28%.
- P3Unproven Earnings Execution
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 5% for 2 consecutive quarters, establishing a reliable delivery pattern that falsifies the unproven-execution concern.
- P4Sub Billion Cap Limits Access
Trip ifMarket cap exceeds $1 billion for 2 consecutive calendar quarters, removing the institutional size restriction.