Value
6.5/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.2 |
| P/S | 9.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.5 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 13.4x
LEN · Why this verdict
Why Lennar (LEN) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score3.9/10
ConfidenceHIGH
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company has missed consensus EPS estimates in three of the past four quarters, with the most recent beat being modest at 6%, suggesting that management's ability to reliably deliver above expectations has weakened materially. Earnings | The miss pattern would reverse if the company posts positive EPS surprises in 2 of the next 3 quarterly reports. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarter produced a beat, which may signal that cost reductions or mix shifts are beginning to stabilize profitability despite the revenue headwind. | ||
Return on assets of 2.6%, thin operating margins, and no identifiable competitive moat place the business quality well below what is normally required to justify holding a position through a cyclical downturn — the balance sheet provides limited cushion if conditions deteriorate. Quality breakdown | Quality concerns ease if return on assets rises above 4% and operating margin improves for 2 consecutive quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterResidential construction is inherently capital-intensive and cyclical; below-average quality metrics at a trough are typical for the industry and may improve meaningfully as the housing cycle turns. | ||
The current price is already above the near-term resistance target, with the stock trading roughly 14% past the level at which upside was expected to be realized — meaning buyers at current prices are accepting negative expected return to the target. Warnings | The overshoot corrects over the next two quarters, with the price retreating toward or below the $93 resistance level that now represents a ceiling. | →Stable |
| CounterA recent cluster of eight analyst upgrades could expand the consensus target meaningfully, repositioning the stock as still-undervalued relative to a revised upside scenario. | ||
The stock is trading below its 200-day moving average with the average slope declining roughly 4% over 30 days, volume distribution is running negative (falling on-balance volume), and the technical pattern reflects a death cross — all consistent with a confirmed downtrend. Momentum breakdown | The downtrend thesis is falsified if the stock reclaims and holds above its 200-day moving average for 4 consecutive weeks with positive on-balance volume. | →Stable |
| CounterThe MACD indicator is improving and the RSI is at a neutral level rather than oversold, which can precede a technical recovery even within a broader downtrend. | ||
The company has missed consensus EPS estimates in three of the past four quarters, with the most recent beat being modest at 6%, suggesting that management's ability to reliably deliver above expectations has weakened materially.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- The miss pattern would reverse if the company posts positive EPS surprises in 2 of the next 3 quarterly reports.
CounterThe most recent quarter produced a beat, which may signal that cost reductions or mix shifts are beginning to stabilize profitability despite the revenue headwind.
Return on assets of 2.6%, thin operating margins, and no identifiable competitive moat place the business quality well below what is normally required to justify holding a position through a cyclical downturn — the balance sheet provides limited cushion if conditions deteriorate.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Quality concerns ease if return on assets rises above 4% and operating margin improves for 2 consecutive quarters.
CounterResidential construction is inherently capital-intensive and cyclical; below-average quality metrics at a trough are typical for the industry and may improve meaningfully as the housing cycle turns.
The current price is already above the near-term resistance target, with the stock trading roughly 14% past the level at which upside was expected to be realized — meaning buyers at current prices are accepting negative expected return to the target.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- The overshoot corrects over the next two quarters, with the price retreating toward or below the $93 resistance level that now represents a ceiling.
CounterA recent cluster of eight analyst upgrades could expand the consensus target meaningfully, repositioning the stock as still-undervalued relative to a revised upside scenario.
The stock is trading below its 200-day moving average with the average slope declining roughly 4% over 30 days, volume distribution is running negative (falling on-balance volume), and the technical pattern reflects a death cross — all consistent with a confirmed downtrend.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- The downtrend thesis is falsified if the stock reclaims and holds above its 200-day moving average for 4 consecutive weeks with positive on-balance volume.
CounterThe MACD indicator is improving and the RSI is at a neutral level rather than oversold, which can precede a technical recovery even within a broader downtrend.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Lennar is trading in a confirmed downtrend with revenue declining roughly 5% year over year, three earnings misses in the past four quarters, and a risk/reward ratio that does not justify adding exposure — the stock has already exceeded its near-term price target, leaving little room for reward relative to the downside.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.5 |
| ROA | 2.6 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 2.1 |
| Net margin | 2.5 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| FCF quality | 5.1 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
- ▸Earnings quality warning: 67% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
Growth
0.6/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.2 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -5%
Momentum
1.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 1.5 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -5.3%/30d — confirmed downtrend
Sentiment
4.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 3.3 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 5.2 |
- ▸LLM news sentiment: -0.35 (n=3)
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.5/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.5 |
| quality rank | 2.1 |
| growth rank | 5.3 |
Technical
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.6 |
| support resistance | 8.2 |
| 52w position | 2.3 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.8 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 3.1 |
| put call | 5.4 |
| implied vol | 4.8 |
| beta | 5.4 |
| debt equity | 8.9 |
Catalyst
4.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.9 |
| dividend safety | 7.0 |
| news activity | 7.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 1B/3M
- ▸Dividend: 227.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (5)
- INSIDER:OK
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:74d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
- MOMENTUM:1.6<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:-1.6=NEGATIVE
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (1)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-1.61
Upside
-12.1%
Downside
7.5%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.39>1.3
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Risk (lower is worse) at 6.8 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:1.6<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 6.8, Value at 6.5, and Technical at 6.0; the weakest are Growth at 0.6, Momentum at 1.6, and Quality at 3.2. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.61 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Price Target Exhaustion
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $110, creating more than 20% upside from current levels.
- P2Confirmed Technical Downtrend
Trip ifStock closes above its 200-day moving average for 4 consecutive weeks with rising on-balance volume.
- P3Earnings Miss Streak
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 5% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4Quality Below Investment Grade
Trip ifReturn on assets rises above 4% for 2 consecutive quarters.