Value
5.4/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 0.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The quality composite score of 2.2 sits below the engine's 4.0 floor, driven by an earnings-quality red flag of -2105% FCF-to-net-income conversion and a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9. Quality breakdown | Free-cash-flow-to-net-income conversion should turn positive and Piotroski F-Score should rise to at least 5/9 over the next 12 months for the quality concern to ease. | →Stable |
| CounterAn extreme negative FCF/NI ratio like this can be an artifact of a near-zero net income denominator rather than reflecting genuinely deteriorating cash generation. | ||
The V9 expert panel shows an asymmetry ratio of 4.67, with modeled upside of 70.1% against downside of 15.0%, comfortably clearing the 1.5 gate threshold. Reward-to-risk math | The asymmetry ratio should stay above 3.0 and modeled upside should remain above 40% over the next 12 months if the favorable risk/reward holds. | →Stable |
| CounterA large modeled upside built on an analyst target for a small, thinly-covered stock can prove unreliable if the target itself is based on light analyst coverage. | ||
Insiders sold a notable $1,763,275 (0.244% of market cap) in the last 90 days with zero offsetting buys, a level the engine classifies as moderate severity. Insider | Insider signal should shift to neutral or bullish with reduced selling activity over the next 12 months if the bearish read is not predictive. | →Stable |
| CounterInsider selling can reflect personal liquidity needs or pre-scheduled selling plans (Rule 10b5-1) rather than a negative view of company prospects. | ||
The company has missed or come in below estimates in the majority of its last 4 reported quarters, with an average surprise of -92.7%. Earnings | The company should return to at least an in-line or beat result over the next two reported quarters if the miss trend is set to reverse. | →Stable |
| CounterThe RSI pullback to 31 with the stock still above its 200-day moving average is flagged in the data as a buy opportunity, suggesting sentiment may already be pricing in the weak earnings trend. | ||
The engine classifies the stock as speculative due to a 41% drawdown from its 52-week high, just over the 40% threshold. Suitability rationale | The drawdown from the 52-week high should narrow to less than 40% over the next 12 months if the recovery is durable. | →Stable |
| CounterA drawdown just barely past the 40% speculative threshold could reverse quickly with a modest price recovery, unlike a deeper structural decline. | ||
CounterAn extreme negative FCF/NI ratio like this can be an artifact of a near-zero net income denominator rather than reflecting genuinely deteriorating cash generation.
CounterA large modeled upside built on an analyst target for a small, thinly-covered stock can prove unreliable if the target itself is based on light analyst coverage.
CounterInsider selling can reflect personal liquidity needs or pre-scheduled selling plans (Rule 10b5-1) rather than a negative view of company prospects.
CounterThe RSI pullback to 31 with the stock still above its 200-day moving average is flagged in the data as a buy opportunity, suggesting sentiment may already be pricing in the weak earnings trend.
CounterA drawdown just barely past the 40% speculative threshold could reverse quickly with a modest price recovery, unlike a deeper structural decline.
Kopin Corporation shows a highly favorable modeled asymmetry with 70.1% upside against 15% downside, but quality sits below the engine's floor with a red-flagged earnings-quality warning of -2105% FCF/NI conversion, notable insider selling of $1.8 million, and a run of earnings misses, all under a speculative classification following a 41% drawdown from its 52-week high.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 0.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.5 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 2.5 |
| Current ratio | 8.8 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 3.8 |
| Piotroski F | 3.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 7.7 |
| MACD | 2.5 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.9 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.2 |
| quality rank | 3.8 |
| growth rank | 0.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.0 |
| support resistance | 8.0 |
| 52w position | 2.5 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 3.4 |
| days to cover | 7.8 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 9.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 0.0 |
| debt equity | 3.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 3.47>1.3, MCap $0.7B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Sentiment at 6.6 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:3.1<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 6.6, Technical at 5.6, and Value at 5.4; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.2, Quality at 2.2, and Catalyst at 2.5. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 4.04 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 2 out of 9, down from the current 3.3.
Trip ifAsymmetry ratio falls below 1.5, reversing the currently passed 4.67 reading.
Trip ifInsider selling exceeds $3,000,000 over a 90-day period, up from the current $1,763,275.
Trip ifEarnings surprise stays below -50% for 2 more consecutive quarters, extending the current miss trend.
Trip ifPrice falls more than 55% off the 52-week high, worse than the current -41% drawdown.