Value
9.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.9 |
| P/S | 7.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 7.2x
- ▸PEG: 0.05
- ▸Attractively valued
KGC · Why this verdict
Why Kinross Gold (KGC) is rated BUY WAIT
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictBUY WAIT
Overall score6.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The setup shows approximately 30% headroom to the analyst price target against a defined downside of roughly 14%, producing a risk/reward ratio close to 5-to-1 — well above the 1.5-to-1 bar required to justify a position — and all asymmetry gates cleared. Engine gate (passed) | Price advances at least 15% toward the analyst target within 12 months as the fundamental thesis re-rates higher. | →Stable |
| CounterFavorable geometry on paper can remain unrealized for extended periods when the technical setup is range-bound; if the stock remains stuck below resistance, the attractive risk/reward is a theoretical option that does not pay out. | ||
The business generates a 35% return on equity, 36% net margins, and a wide economic moat, supported by a near-perfect financial health score of 8 out of 9 — a combination that marks it as a high-quality franchise with durable earnings power across multiple environments. Quality breakdown | Return on equity remains above 25% and net margins stay above 30% over the next 12 months, sustaining the quality profile. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarter produced an earnings miss, breaking a three-beat streak; if the margin and return profile has peaked, the quality metrics may not hold at current levels going forward. | ||
With 61% revenue growth year over year and a PEG of 0.06, the market is pricing in virtually none of the company's growth trajectory; at 8x forward earnings, the business is valued as though growth will abruptly stall rather than continue even a fraction of the recent pace. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth stays above 30% year over year for 2 consecutive quarters, sustaining the case that the valuation discount reflects a genuine mispricing. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarter resulted in a miss, and if revenue growth has decelerated materially from the 61% pace, the attractive PEG may reflect backward-looking metrics rather than the forward trajectory. | ||
A debt-to-equity ratio of 8.2 creates a meaningful leverage overhang, and elevated debt leaves less cushion if cash generation softens or operating conditions shift unfavorably. Bear case | Debt-to-equity falls below 4x within 4 quarters as the company applies strong free cash flows to debt reduction. | →Stable |
| CounterThe company's 36% margins and strong cash generation may be more than adequate to service the current debt load, making the leverage a manageable cost of capital rather than an existential risk. | ||
The stock is trading in a range-bound setup below its 200-day moving average, with a recent sharp gap up of 6.7% that may be subject to mean-reversion; no sustained breakout above resistance has been confirmed, keeping the technical posture cautious. Momentum breakdown | A sustained close above the 200-day moving average for 10 consecutive trading days would confirm the uptrend and upgrade the technical posture. | →Stable |
| CounterThe 200-day moving average itself is still rising, consistent with a pullback within an ongoing uptrend rather than a trend reversal — if the pullback resolves upward, the technical concern evaporates quickly. | ||
The setup shows approximately 30% headroom to the analyst price target against a defined downside of roughly 14%, producing a risk/reward ratio close to 5-to-1 — well above the 1.5-to-1 bar required to justify a position — and all asymmetry gates cleared.
→StableEngine gate (passed)
- Expectation
- Price advances at least 15% toward the analyst target within 12 months as the fundamental thesis re-rates higher.
CounterFavorable geometry on paper can remain unrealized for extended periods when the technical setup is range-bound; if the stock remains stuck below resistance, the attractive risk/reward is a theoretical option that does not pay out.
The business generates a 35% return on equity, 36% net margins, and a wide economic moat, supported by a near-perfect financial health score of 8 out of 9 — a combination that marks it as a high-quality franchise with durable earnings power across multiple environments.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Return on equity remains above 25% and net margins stay above 30% over the next 12 months, sustaining the quality profile.
CounterThe most recent quarter produced an earnings miss, breaking a three-beat streak; if the margin and return profile has peaked, the quality metrics may not hold at current levels going forward.
With 61% revenue growth year over year and a PEG of 0.06, the market is pricing in virtually none of the company's growth trajectory; at 8x forward earnings, the business is valued as though growth will abruptly stall rather than continue even a fraction of the recent pace.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth stays above 30% year over year for 2 consecutive quarters, sustaining the case that the valuation discount reflects a genuine mispricing.
CounterThe most recent quarter resulted in a miss, and if revenue growth has decelerated materially from the 61% pace, the attractive PEG may reflect backward-looking metrics rather than the forward trajectory.
A debt-to-equity ratio of 8.2 creates a meaningful leverage overhang, and elevated debt leaves less cushion if cash generation softens or operating conditions shift unfavorably.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Debt-to-equity falls below 4x within 4 quarters as the company applies strong free cash flows to debt reduction.
CounterThe company's 36% margins and strong cash generation may be more than adequate to service the current debt load, making the leverage a manageable cost of capital rather than an existential risk.
The stock is trading in a range-bound setup below its 200-day moving average, with a recent sharp gap up of 6.7% that may be subject to mean-reversion; no sustained breakout above resistance has been confirmed, keeping the technical posture cautious.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- A sustained close above the 200-day moving average for 10 consecutive trading days would confirm the uptrend and upgrade the technical posture.
CounterThe 200-day moving average itself is still rising, consistent with a pullback within an ongoing uptrend rather than a trend reversal — if the pullback resolves upward, the technical concern evaporates quickly.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Kinross Gold offers exceptional business quality — a 35% return on equity, 36% margins, and 61% revenue growth — at a deeply discounted valuation of 8x forward earnings with roughly 30% potential upside and a nearly 5-to-1 favorable risk/reward ratio; the primary near-term hurdles are elevated leverage and a technical setup that has not yet produced a confirmed breakout above resistance.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
9.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0 |
| ROA | 10.0 |
| Gross margin | 9.7 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.5 |
| FCF quality | 7.0 |
| Moat | 7.5 |
| Rule of 40 | 9.5 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Excellent ROE: 35%
- ▸Strong margins: 36%
- ▸Wide economic moat
- ▸Compounder quality: strong returns + growth
Growth
10.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong growth: 61% YoY
Momentum
2.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 3.2 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 2.9 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+3.4%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness
Sentiment
7.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.0 |
| Price target | 9.7 |
| erm sentiment | 5.7 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (10.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Analyst upside: 56%
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%Peer rank
3.9/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.1 |
| quality rank | 7.7 |
| growth rank | 1.9 |
- ▸Superior ROE vs peers
Technical
5.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.1 |
| support resistance | 7.4 |
| 52w position | 2.7 |
| gap | 4.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| days to cover | 8.4 |
| volatility | 0.2 |
| put call | 9.0 |
| implied vol | 2.0 |
| beta | 5.4 |
| debt equity | 0.0 |
- ▸High IV: 68%
Catalyst
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 9.9 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
- ▸Dividend: 59.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Exceptional fundamentals but wait for better entry timing.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_B_EXCEPTIONAL_WAITPassed (7)
- ASYMMETRY:3.6>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:25d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- MOMENTUM:2.8<4.5
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
3.65
Upside
+35.9%
Downside
9.8%
Sizing output
STARTER
SetupRange Bound — RSI 49 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeTemporary headwind — High quality (9.2) with weak momentum (2.8)
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.41>1.3
Investment implication
The STRONG_BUY_WAIT verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 2.8<4.5 outcome against Growth at 10.0 and asymmetric R:R of 3.65.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Quality at 9.2, and Value at 9.1; the weakest are Momentum at 2.8, Peer rank at 3.9, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.2. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.65 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Exceptional Quality Compounder
Trip ifReturn on equity falls below 20% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Growth Priced At Deep Discount
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 20% year over year for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Favorable Asymmetry Geometry
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target is revised below $30 for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4Leverage Overhang
Trip ifDebt-to-equity falls below 4x for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P5Technical Breakout Unconfirmed
Trip ifPrice closes above the 200-day moving average for 10 consecutive trading days.