Value
8.8/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 |
| P/S | 9.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.8 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 6.5x
- ▸Attractively valued
JCAP · Why this verdict
Why Jefferson Capital (JCAP) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score6.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The business has earned a wide economic moat designation, return on equity of 37%, operating margins of 26%, and a financial health score of 8 out of 9—a combination that describes a franchise generating returns well above average for its sector. Quality breakdown | Return on equity stays above 25% and operating margins remain above 20% for four consecutive quarters, confirming the high-return profile is structural rather than cyclical. | →Stable |
| CounterA return on equity of 37% may be partially flattered by leverage; if earnings growth moderates or the balance sheet is deleveraged, the return on equity figure could compress, and the wide-moat designation would face scrutiny. | ||
A forward price-to-earnings multiple of 5.6 times and 38.6% upside to the analyst consensus target represent a substantial discount for a business with the quality characteristics described; the stock ranks highly on value relative to its peer group. Valuation breakdown | Price appreciates at least 20% toward the analyst target within 12 months as the discount to perceived intrinsic value narrows. | →Stable |
| CounterA forward multiple of 5.6 times may reflect the market pricing in a deterioration of earnings that analysts have not yet incorporated; a low multiple can persist if the negative free cash flow conversion raises doubts about earnings sustainability. | ||
With a market capitalization of $0.90 billion, the stock falls below the $1.0 billion minimum size threshold, placing it outside the standard investable universe; this size constraint limits the pool of eligible institutional buyers and introduces liquidity risk not fully reflected in the quality and valuation scores. Warnings | Market capitalization rises above $1.0 billion, clearing the minimum size threshold and expanding the eligible institutional investor base. | →Stable |
| CounterThe $0.90 billion figure sits close to the $1 billion floor; a modest re-rating driven by multiple expansion or continued earnings growth could push the market cap above the threshold relatively quickly. | ||
Free cash flow is running at negative 84% relative to net income, meaning the company is not converting reported profits into cash; this is flagged as an earnings quality red flag and raises questions about whether the stated earnings reliably measure economic performance. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow turns positive and reaches at least 50% of net income for two consecutive quarters, demonstrating that earnings quality has improved to a sustainable level. | →Stable |
| CounterA Piotroski financial health score of 8 out of 9 and a current ratio well above distress levels indicate the balance sheet is broadly healthy; the negative free cash flow conversion may reflect an investment phase that normalizes rather than a structural cash drain. | ||
The business has earned a wide economic moat designation, return on equity of 37%, operating margins of 26%, and a financial health score of 8 out of 9—a combination that describes a franchise generating returns well above average for its sector.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Return on equity stays above 25% and operating margins remain above 20% for four consecutive quarters, confirming the high-return profile is structural rather than cyclical.
CounterA return on equity of 37% may be partially flattered by leverage; if earnings growth moderates or the balance sheet is deleveraged, the return on equity figure could compress, and the wide-moat designation would face scrutiny.
A forward price-to-earnings multiple of 5.6 times and 38.6% upside to the analyst consensus target represent a substantial discount for a business with the quality characteristics described; the stock ranks highly on value relative to its peer group.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- Price appreciates at least 20% toward the analyst target within 12 months as the discount to perceived intrinsic value narrows.
CounterA forward multiple of 5.6 times may reflect the market pricing in a deterioration of earnings that analysts have not yet incorporated; a low multiple can persist if the negative free cash flow conversion raises doubts about earnings sustainability.
With a market capitalization of $0.90 billion, the stock falls below the $1.0 billion minimum size threshold, placing it outside the standard investable universe; this size constraint limits the pool of eligible institutional buyers and introduces liquidity risk not fully reflected in the quality and valuation scores.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- Market capitalization rises above $1.0 billion, clearing the minimum size threshold and expanding the eligible institutional investor base.
CounterThe $0.90 billion figure sits close to the $1 billion floor; a modest re-rating driven by multiple expansion or continued earnings growth could push the market cap above the threshold relatively quickly.
Free cash flow is running at negative 84% relative to net income, meaning the company is not converting reported profits into cash; this is flagged as an earnings quality red flag and raises questions about whether the stated earnings reliably measure economic performance.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Free cash flow turns positive and reaches at least 50% of net income for two consecutive quarters, demonstrating that earnings quality has improved to a sustainable level.
CounterA Piotroski financial health score of 8 out of 9 and a current ratio well above distress levels indicate the balance sheet is broadly healthy; the negative free cash flow conversion may reflect an investment phase that normalizes rather than a structural cash drain.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
A high-quality franchise with a wide economic moat, return on equity of 37%, strong operating margins of 26%, and a financial health score of 8 out of 9 screens as attractively valued at a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 5.6 times with 38.6% implied upside; however, free cash flow is deeply negative relative to net income—a material quality concern—and a market capitalization of $0.90 billion places the stock below the minimum size threshold for the standard investable universe.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
7.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0 |
| ROA | 8.2 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 7.9 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 7.5 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Excellent ROE: 37%
- ▸Strong margins: 26%
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: -84% FCF/NI
- ▸Wide economic moat
Growth
5.5/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.5 |
Momentum
5.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 2.7 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 6.9 |
| MA position | 7.0 |
| Volume | 0.7 |
- ▸Overbought bear rally (RSI 75)
- ▸Below 200-MA (recent, shallow — too early to call)
Sentiment
6.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.0 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.1 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 38%
Insider
5.1/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.2 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
6.2/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.0 |
| quality rank | 7.5 |
| growth rank | 4.3 |
- ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
- ▸Superior ROE vs peers
Technical
3.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.3 |
| support resistance | 2.5 |
| 52w position | 6.2 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.1 |
| days to cover | 6.8 |
| volatility | 2.8 |
| debt equity | 1.8 |
| news risk | 6.0 |
Catalyst
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 7.1 |
| dividend safety | 6.0 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
- ▸Dividend: 510.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (8)
- MOMENTUM:5.5>=4.5
- INSIDER:OK
- DEATH_CROSS:QUALITY_MOMENTUM_EXEMPT
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:40d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:1.4<1.5@spot
Warning (2)
- MOMENTUM:5.5<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
- DEATH_CROSS:quality=7.5>=7.5+momentum=5.5>=5.0 exempted
Reward-to-Risk
1.35
Upside
+20.2%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 75
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.0B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.0B<$5B
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.8 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 8.8) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:1.4<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 1.35 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.8, Quality at 7.5, and Sentiment at 6.2; the weakest are Technical at 3.7, Risk (lower is worse) at 4.9, and Insider at 5.1. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.35 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1High Quality Wide Moat Returns
Trip ifReturn on equity falls below 20% for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the high-return profile is deteriorating.
- P2Attractive Valuation Deep Upside
Trip ifForward EPS estimates are cut by more than 25%, raising the implied forward price-to-earnings multiple above 7x and removing the deep-value designation.
- P3Sub 1b Market Cap Liquidity Constraint
Trip ifMarket capitalization rises above $1.0 billion, clearing the minimum investable-universe size threshold.
- P4Negative Fcf Earnings Quality Concern
Trip ifFree cash flow as a percentage of net income rises above 50% for 2 consecutive quarters.